• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动作控制需要注意力:抓握动作的进一步证据

Attention is needed for action control: further evidence from grasping.

作者信息

Hesse Constanze, Schenk Thomas, Deubel Heiner

机构信息

Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, Wolfson Research Institute, Durham University, UK.

出版信息

Vision Res. 2012 Oct 15;71:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.08.014. Epub 2012 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2012.08.014
PMID:22960138
Abstract

In this study we investigated whether motor and perceptual tasks share common attentional resources. To this end, we used a dual-task paradigm requiring participants to perform grasping movements toward objects of varying size and at the same time to identify a perceptual target presented at the object's location. To ensure that both tasks were performed simultaneously and to prevent participants from adopting a sequential strategy, the perceptual target was always presented after movement onset and could occur at two different moments in time (early vs. late). Our findings show that both, the planning and the control of the movement were altered in the dual-task condition, resulting in prolonged reaction times and delayed adjustment of the grip to object size. Also, the perceptual performance was impaired when both tasks were performed concurrently. These findings are in contrast with previous studies suggesting that only movement planning but not movement control are susceptible to dual-task interferences (Enns & Liu, 2009, chap. 12). Instead, our results give further evidence for the proposition that the dorsal (visuomotor) and ventral (perceptual) stream share the same attentional resources and that attention is required for effective grasping.

摘要

在本研究中,我们调查了运动任务和感知任务是否共享共同的注意力资源。为此,我们采用了一种双任务范式,要求参与者对不同大小的物体进行抓握动作,同时识别出出现在物体位置的感知目标。为确保两项任务同时进行,并防止参与者采用顺序策略,感知目标总是在动作开始后呈现,且可能出现在两个不同的时刻(早期与晚期)。我们的研究结果表明,在双任务条件下,运动的计划和控制均发生了改变,导致反应时间延长,以及抓握对物体大小的调整延迟。此外,当两项任务同时进行时,感知表现也会受损。这些发现与之前的研究形成对比,之前的研究表明只有运动计划而非运动控制容易受到双任务干扰(恩斯和刘,2009年,第12章)。相反,我们的结果进一步证明了以下观点:背侧(视觉运动)和腹侧(感知)通路共享相同的注意力资源,并且有效抓握需要注意力。

相似文献

1
Attention is needed for action control: further evidence from grasping.动作控制需要注意力:抓握动作的进一步证据
Vision Res. 2012 Oct 15;71:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.08.014. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
2
Efficient grasping requires attentional resources.高效抓握需要注意力资源。
Vision Res. 2011 Jun 1;51(11):1223-31. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.03.014. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
3
Planning movements well in advance.提前做好动作规划。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2008 Oct-Dec;25(7-8):985-95. doi: 10.1080/02643290701862399.
4
Dual-task interference is greater in delayed grasping than in visually guided grasping.与视觉引导抓握相比,延迟抓握中的双任务干扰更大。
J Vis. 2007 May 4;7(5):5.1-12. doi: 10.1167/7.5.5.
5
Ventral and dorsal stream contributions to the online control of immediate and delayed grasping: a TMS approach.腹侧和背侧通路对即时和延迟抓握在线控制的贡献:一项经颅磁刺激研究
Neuropsychologia. 2009 May;47(6):1553-62. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.034. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
6
The limits of attention for visual perception and action in aging.衰老过程中视觉感知与行动的注意力极限
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2009 May;16(3):311-29. doi: 10.1080/13825580902741351. Epub 2009 Mar 19.
7
Sequential actions: effects of upcoming perceptual and motor tasks on current actions.连续动作:即将到来的感知和运动任务对当前动作的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Apr;234(4):955-62. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4511-6. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
8
Visuomotor priming of a manual reaching movement during a perceptual decision task.在知觉决策任务期间手动伸展运动的视运动启动
Brain Res. 2006 Dec 8;1124(1):81-5. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.09.071. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
9
Influence of near threshold visual distractors on perceptual detection and reaching movements.近阈限视觉干扰物对知觉检测和伸手动作的影响。
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Oct;104(4):2249-56. doi: 10.1152/jn.01123.2009. Epub 2010 Aug 11.
10
Dual cognitive task affects reaching and grasping behavior in subjects with macular disorders.双重认知任务影响黄斑病变患者的伸手和抓握行为。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 May 7;54(5):3281-8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-11045.

引用本文的文献

1
Attention directs actions in visual foraging.注意力引导视觉觅食中的行动。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 6;15(1):15788. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97986-1.
2
Eye and hand movements disrupt attentional control.眼动和手动会干扰注意力控制。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 19;17(1):e0262567. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262567. eCollection 2022.
3
Priming of grasp affordance in an ambiguous object: evidence from ERPs, source localization, and motion tracking.模糊物体中抓握可供性的启动:来自事件相关电位、源定位和运动追踪的证据
Heliyon. 2021 Apr 24;7(4):e06870. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06870. eCollection 2021 Apr.
4
Hear speech, change your reach: changes in the left-hand grasp-to-eat action during speech processing.倾听言语,改变伸手动作:言语处理过程中左手抓握进食动作的变化。
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Dec;236(12):3267-3277. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5376-2. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
5
Shared attention for action selection and action monitoring in goal-directed reaching.共同注意在目标导向伸手动作选择和动作监控中的作用。
Psychol Res. 2020 Mar;84(2):313-326. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1064-x. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
6
Individual differences in processing resources modulate bimanual interference in pointing.个体在加工资源上的差异调节了指向运动中的双手干扰。
Psychol Res. 2020 Mar;84(2):440-453. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1050-3. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
7
High-precision voluntary movements are largely independent of preceding vertex potentials elicited by sudden sensory events.高精度的随意运动在很大程度上独立于由突然的感觉事件引起的先前的顶点电位。
J Physiol. 2018 Aug;596(16):3655-3673. doi: 10.1113/JP275715. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
8
Increased cognitive demands boost the spatial interference effect in bimanual pointing.认知需求的增加会增强双手指向中的空间干扰效应。
Psychol Res. 2017 May;81(3):582-595. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0762-5. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
9
The role of audience participation and task relevance on change detection during a card trick.观众参与和任务相关性在纸牌戏法中对变化检测的作用。
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 5;6:13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00013. eCollection 2015.
10
The distribution of spatial attention changes with task demands during goal-directed reaching.在目标导向的伸手动作过程中,空间注意力的分布会随着任务需求而变化。
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Jun;232(6):1883-93. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-3880-6. Epub 2014 Mar 6.