Suppr超能文献

三种不同方法测定人乳腺癌雌激素受体的比较。

A comparison of three different methods for the determination of estrogen receptors in human breast cancer.

作者信息

Cudahy T J, Boeryd B R, Franlund B K, Nordenskjöld B A

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Linköping University Hospital, Sweden.

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 1988 Nov;90(5):583-90. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/90.5.583.

Abstract

Forty-seven cases of breast cancer were analyzed for estrogen receptors (ERs) by three different techniques: (1) a biochemical assay using isoelectric focusing in polyacrylamide gel; (2) a monoclonal ER immunocytochemical assay (ERICA, Abbott Laboratories Diagnostics Division), and (3) a polyclonal antiestradiol immunohistochemical technique using formalin-fixed tissue. A high level of agreement (85%) was noted between the biochemical assay and ERICA. The ERICA-processed slides showed minimal background staining and were easy to interpret. Compared with the biochemical assay, ERICA achieved a positive predictive value of 86% and a negative predictive value of 82%. In contrast, results from the polyclonal antiestradiol histologic technique did not correlate with biochemical results and showed positive and negative predictive values of 61% and 25%, respectively. The authors conclude that the ERICA technique should prove to be a valuable adjunct to traditional biochemical ER assays.

摘要

采用三种不同技术对47例乳腺癌患者的雌激素受体(ERs)进行了分析:(1)使用聚丙烯酰胺凝胶等电聚焦的生化检测法;(2)单克隆ER免疫细胞化学检测法(ERICA,雅培实验室诊断部);(3)使用福尔马林固定组织的多克隆抗雌二醇免疫组织化学技术。生化检测法与ERICA之间具有高度一致性(85%)。经ERICA处理的玻片背景染色极少,易于解读。与生化检测法相比,ERICA的阳性预测值为86%,阴性预测值为82%。相比之下,多克隆抗雌二醇组织学技术的结果与生化结果不相关,其阳性和阴性预测值分别为61%和25%。作者得出结论,ERICA技术应被证明是传统生化ER检测的一种有价值的辅助方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验