Suppr超能文献

老年患者全膝关节置换术中周围神经阻滞与全身麻醉对术后恢复质量的影响

Peripheral nerve blocks versus general anesthesia for total knee replacement in elderly patients on the postoperative quality of recovery.

作者信息

Liu JunLe, Yuan WeiXiu, Wang XiaoLin, Royse Colin F, Gong MaoWei, Zhao Ying, Zhang Hong

机构信息

Anesthesia and Operation Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital and Medical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Anesthesia and Pain Management Unit, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia ; Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Interv Aging. 2014 Feb 18;9:341-50. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S56116. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Both peripheral nerve blocks with sedation or general anesthesia can be used for total knee replacement surgery.

OBJECTIVES

We compared these anesthetic techniques on the postoperative quality of recovery early in elderly patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In our study, 213 patients who were ≥65 years old and undergoing total knee replacement were randomized to peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) - lumbar plexus and sciatic - with propofol sedation, or general anesthesia with combined propofol and remifentanil. Blocks were performed using nerve stimulation and 0.35% ropivacaine. All patients received postoperative multimodal analgesia. Postoperative recovery was assessed at 15 minutes, 40 minutes, 1 day, 3 days, and 7 days after surgery, with the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale, in physiological, nociceptive, emotive, modified activities of daily living, modified cognitive, and overall patient perspective domains.

RESULTS

Intraoperative blood pressure and heart rate were more stable with PNBs (P<0.001). The recovery was better with PNBs in physiological (P<0.001), emotive (depression and anxiety) (P<0.001), nociceptive (pain and nausea) (P<0.001), modified cognitive (P<0.001), and all domains recovery (P<0.001), but not in activities of daily living (P=0.181). Intraoperative drugs and the postoperative sulfentanil requirement of the PNBs group were lower (all P<0.001). Differences were greatest early after surgery with equivalence by 1 week. Satisfaction was high and not different between groups (P=0.059).

CONCLUSION

Lumbar plexus and sciatic blocks with sedation facilitates faster postoperative recovery than general anesthesia, but not at 1 week after total knee replacement in patients who were 65 years or older. The trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. (NCT01871012).

摘要

背景

用于全膝关节置换手术的麻醉方式可以选择外周神经阻滞联合镇静或全身麻醉。

目的

我们比较了这两种麻醉技术对老年患者术后早期恢复质量的影响。

材料与方法

在本研究中,213例年龄≥65岁且接受全膝关节置换手术的患者被随机分为两组,一组接受外周神经阻滞(腰丛和坐骨神经)联合丙泊酚镇静,另一组接受丙泊酚与瑞芬太尼复合的全身麻醉。神经阻滞采用神经刺激定位技术,使用0.35%的罗哌卡因。所有患者术后均接受多模式镇痛。术后分别于术后15分钟、40分钟、1天、3天和7天,采用术后恢复质量量表,从生理、伤害感受、情绪、改良日常生活活动能力、改良认知功能以及患者整体感受等方面评估恢复情况。

结果

外周神经阻滞组术中血压和心率更稳定(P<0.001)。外周神经阻滞组在生理(P<0.001)、情绪(抑郁和焦虑)(P<0.001)、伤害感受(疼痛和恶心)(P<0.001)、改良认知功能(P<0.001)以及所有领域的恢复情况(P<0.001)方面均优于全身麻醉组,但在日常生活活动能力方面差异无统计学意义(P=0.181)。外周神经阻滞组术中用药量及术后舒芬太尼需求量均较低(均P<0.001)。术后早期两组差异最大,至术后1周时两组相当。两组患者满意度均较高,且组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.059)。

结论

对于65岁及以上患者,腰丛和坐骨神经阻滞联合镇静较全身麻醉能促进全膝关节置换术后更快恢复,但术后1周时两组恢复情况相当。本试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT01871012)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验