Rodríguez-Chessa Jaime G, Olate Sergio, Netto Henrique Duque, Shibli Jamil, de Moraes Márcio, Mazzonetto Renato
Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Universidad de San Martin de Porres Peru.
Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Universidad de La Frontera Chile ; Center for Biomedical Research, Universidad Autónoma de Chile Chile.
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014 Feb 15;7(2):426-30. eCollection 2014.
Atrophic maxilla is a common condition in older population; some treatments are proposed with bone reconstruction or zygomatic implant. Long-term follow up show the efficiencies of zygomatic implant but limited data are associated to consecutive patient. The aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the zygomatic implants performed consecutively in 29 patients. Data from clinical records of 29 patients treated with zygomatic implants were analyzed; were include patient with at least 10 month of prosthetic function. Four surgeons realized all surgeries using local anesthesia with a slot technique on local anesthesia; the variables analyzed were implant survival, complications, prosthetic load and satisfaction of patient; data collection was analyzed by descriptive statistic and chi-square test with p<0.05 for significance statistical. 67 zygomatic implants and 84 conventional implants were installed in patients between 35 and 69 year old being 18 (62%) female and 11 (38%) male.The main indication was the case of severe alveolar resorption in 21 cases (72.41%), followed by failures in maxillary reconstruction with bone graft in 4 (13.79%). The implant success was 79.1% and the immediate or delayed load was not associated to statistical difference (p=0.104). The main complication was the loss of osseointegration and mucositis. Analogue Visual Scale (AVS) for satisfaction show acceptable esthetic and function. Finally we conclude that zygomatic implant present adequate survivor and a good response of patient; important complication can be present in a learn curve for this surgery.
萎缩性上颌骨在老年人群中较为常见;针对该病症提出了一些骨重建或颧骨种植体等治疗方法。长期随访显示了颧骨种植体的有效性,但关于连续患者的相关数据有限。本研究的目的是回顾性评估连续对29例患者实施的颧骨种植体手术。分析了29例接受颧骨种植体治疗患者的临床记录数据;纳入了至少有10个月修复功能的患者。4名外科医生均采用局部麻醉下的槽沟技术完成了所有手术;分析的变量包括种植体存活率、并发症、修复负荷及患者满意度;数据收集采用描述性统计分析和卡方检验,p<0.05为具有统计学意义。在35至69岁的患者中植入了67枚颧骨种植体和84枚传统种植体,其中女性18例(62%),男性11例(38%)。主要适应症为21例(72.41%)严重牙槽骨吸收病例,其次是4例(13.79%)上颌骨植骨重建失败病例。种植体成功率为79.1%,即刻或延迟加载与统计学差异无关(p=0.104)。主要并发症为骨结合丧失和黏膜炎。患者满意度的视觉模拟评分(AVS)显示美观和功能方面均可接受。最后我们得出结论,颧骨种植体具有足够的存活率且患者反应良好;在该手术的学习曲线阶段可能会出现重要并发症。