• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[超声引导下儿童及青少年外周静脉导管置入的自信程度与留置时间]

[Assertiveness and peripheral intravenous catheters dwell time with ultrasonography-guided insertion in children and adolescents].

作者信息

Avelar Ariane Ferreira Machado, Peterlini Maria Angélica Sorgini, da Pedreira Mavilde Luz Gonçalves

机构信息

Departamento de Enfermagem Pediátrica da Escola Paulista de Enfermagem da Universidade Federal de São Paulo. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2013 Jun;47(3):539-46. doi: 10.1590/s0080-623420130000300003.

DOI:10.1590/s0080-623420130000300003
PMID:24601127
Abstract

Randomized controlled trial which aimed to verify whether the use of vascular ultrasound (VUS) increases assertiveness in the use of peripheral venous catheter in children, and the catheter dwell time, when compared to traditional puncture. Data were collected after approval of theethical merit. Children and adolescents undergoing VUS-guided peripheral intravenous (GVUS) or puncture guided by clinical assessment of the venous conditions(CG) were included in the study. Significance level was set at p< or =0.05. The sample was composed of 382 punctures, 188 (49.2%) in VUS Gand 194 (50.8%) in CG, performed in 335 children. Assertiveness was found in 73 (71.6%) GVUS catheters and in 84(71.8%) of the CG (p=0.970), and catheter dwell time presented a median of less than one day in both groups (p=0.121), showing nostatistically significant difference. VUS did not significantly influence the results of the dependent variables investigated. ClinicalTrials.govNCT00930254.

摘要

一项随机对照试验,旨在验证与传统穿刺相比,使用血管超声(VUS)是否能提高儿童外周静脉导管使用的成功率以及导管留置时间。在伦理审查通过后收集数据。纳入研究的儿童和青少年接受VUS引导下的外周静脉穿刺(GVUS)或根据静脉状况临床评估进行的穿刺(CG)。显著性水平设定为p≤0.05。样本包括335名儿童的382次穿刺,其中188次(49.2%)为GVUS,194次(50.8%)为CG。GVUS组73根(71.6%)导管和CG组84根(71.8%)导管穿刺成功(p = 0.970),两组导管留置时间中位数均小于1天(p = 0.121),无统计学显著差异。VUS对所研究的因变量结果无显著影响。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT00930254。

相似文献

1
[Assertiveness and peripheral intravenous catheters dwell time with ultrasonography-guided insertion in children and adolescents].[超声引导下儿童及青少年外周静脉导管置入的自信程度与留置时间]
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2013 Jun;47(3):539-46. doi: 10.1590/s0080-623420130000300003.
2
Ultrasound-guided placement of peripherally inserted intravenous catheters increase catheter dwell time in children.超声引导下外周静脉置入中心静脉导管可延长儿童导管留置时间。
J Vasc Access. 2021 Mar;22(2):189-193. doi: 10.1177/1129729820929826. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
3
Placement of peripherally inserted central catheters in children guided by ultrasound: a prospective randomized, and controlled trial.超声引导下小儿外周静脉置入中心静脉导管的应用:前瞻性随机对照研究。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012 Sep;13(5):e282-7. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e318245597c.
4
[Prospective, randomized and controlled trial on the dwell time of peripheral intravenous catheters in children, according to three dressing regimens].
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2005 May-Jun;13(3):291-8. doi: 10.1590/s0104-11692005000300002. Epub 2005 Jul 27.
5
Randomized controlled trial of ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter placement versus traditional techniques in difficult-access pediatric patients.超声引导下外周静脉置管与传统技术在小儿难穿刺患者中的随机对照试验
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009 Mar;25(3):154-9. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31819a8946.
6
Standard long IV catheters versus extended dwell catheters: A randomized comparison of ultrasound-guided catheter survival.标准长 IV 导管与延长留置导管:超声引导导管生存的随机比较。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Apr;37(4):715-721. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.07.031. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
7
Ultrasound or near-infrared vascular imaging to guide peripheral intravenous catheterization in children: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.超声或近红外血管成像用于指导儿童外周静脉置管:一项实用随机对照试验。
CMAJ. 2015 May 19;187(8):563-570. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.141012. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
8
UltraSound guided PEripheral Catheterization increases first-atTempt success RAte in hospitalized patients when compared with conventional technique: SPECTRA - Randomized Clinical Trial.超声引导外周血管介入术与传统技术相比,可提高住院患者首次尝试成功率:SPECTRA 随机临床试验。
J Vasc Access. 2024 Sep;25(5):1450-1459. doi: 10.1177/11297298231162132. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
9
Ultrasound-guided PIVC insertion: a randomised controlled trial protocol.超声引导下经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管术:一项随机对照试验方案。
Br J Nurs. 2023 Jul 27;32(14):S22-S28. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2023.32.14.S22.
10
Ultralong Versus Standard Long Peripheral Intravenous Catheters: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasonographically Guided Catheter Survival.超长型与标准长型外周静脉留置导管:超声引导下导管生存的随机对照试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Aug;76(2):134-142. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.11.013. Epub 2020 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The ultrasound-guided versus standard technique for peripheral intravenous catheter placement by nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.护士进行外周静脉导管置入的超声引导技术与标准技术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Heliyon. 2024 May 3;10(9):e30582. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30582. eCollection 2024 May 15.
2
Comparison of ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter insertion with landmark technique in paediatric patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.超声引导下外周静脉置管与体表标志技术在儿科患者中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2022 Jun;58(6):953-961. doi: 10.1111/jpc.15985. Epub 2022 Apr 20.