• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

功能性免疫毒性测试对农药危害识别和风险评估影响的回顾性评估。

Retrospective evaluation of the impact of functional immunotoxicity testing on pesticide hazard identification and risk assessment.

作者信息

Gehen Sean C, Blacker Ann M, Boverhof Darrell R, Hanley Thomas R, Hastings Charles E, Ladics Gregory S, Lu Haitian, O'Neal Fredrick O

机构信息

Dow AgroSciences LLC , Indianapolis, IN , USA.

出版信息

Crit Rev Toxicol. 2014 May;44(5):407-19. doi: 10.3109/10408444.2014.882291. Epub 2014 Mar 7.

DOI:10.3109/10408444.2014.882291
PMID:24601769
Abstract

Conduct of a T-cell-dependent antibody response (TDAR) assay in rodents according to Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Test Guideline OPPTS 870.7800 is now required for chemical pesticide active ingredients registered in the United States. To assess potential regulatory impact, a retrospective analysis was developed using TDAR tests conducted on 78 pesticide chemicals from 46 separate chemical classes. The objective of the retrospective analysis was to examine the frequency of positive responses and determine the potential for the TDAR to yield lower endpoints than those utilized to calculate reference doses (RfDs). A reduction in the TDAR response was observed at only the high-dose level in five studies, while it was unaltered in the remaining studies. Importantly, for all 78 pesticide chemicals, the TDAR no-observed-adverse-effect levels (TDAR NOAELs) were greater than the NOAELS currently in use as risk assessment endpoints. The TDAR NOAELs were higher than the current EPA-selected endpoints for the chronic RfD, short-term, intermediate and long-term exposure scenarios by 3-27,000, 3-1,688, 3-1,688 and 4.9-1,688 times, respectively. Based on this analysis, conduct of the TDAR assay had minimal impact on hazard identification and did not impact human health risk assessments for the pesticides included in this evaluation. These data strongly support employment of alternative approaches including initial weight-of-evidence analysis for immunotoxic potential prior to conducting functional immunotoxicity testing for pesticide active ingredients.

摘要

根据美国环境保护局(EPA)测试指南OPPTS 870.7800在啮齿动物中进行T细胞依赖性抗体反应(TDAR)试验,现在是美国注册化学农药活性成分所必需的。为了评估潜在的监管影响,利用对来自46个不同化学类别的78种农药化学品进行的TDAR试验开展了一项回顾性分析。该回顾性分析的目的是检查阳性反应的频率,并确定TDAR产生比用于计算参考剂量(RfD)的终点更低的终点的可能性。在五项研究中仅在高剂量水平观察到TDAR反应降低,而在其余研究中未改变。重要的是,对于所有78种农药化学品,TDAR未观察到不良反应水平(TDAR NOAELs)大于目前用作风险评估终点的NOAELS。TDAR NOAELs分别比当前EPA选择的慢性RfD、短期、中期和长期暴露情景的终点高3至27,000倍、3至1,688倍、3至1,688倍和4.9至1,688倍。基于该分析,TDAR试验的开展对危害识别影响极小,并且不影响本评估中所包括农药的人体健康风险评估。这些数据有力地支持采用替代方法,包括在对农药活性成分进行功能性免疫毒性测试之前,对免疫毒性潜力进行初步的证据权重分析。

相似文献

1
Retrospective evaluation of the impact of functional immunotoxicity testing on pesticide hazard identification and risk assessment.功能性免疫毒性测试对农药危害识别和风险评估影响的回顾性评估。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2014 May;44(5):407-19. doi: 10.3109/10408444.2014.882291. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
2
A retrospective analysis of toxicity studies in dogs and impact on the chronic reference dose for conventional pesticide chemicals.对狗的毒性研究进行回顾性分析及其对常规农药化学品慢性参考剂量的影响。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2010 Jan;40(1):16-23. doi: 10.3109/10408440903401529.
3
The use of developmental neurotoxicity data in pesticide risk assessments.发育神经毒性数据在农药风险评估中的应用。
Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2010 Sep-Oct;32(5):563-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2010.04.053. Epub 2010 Apr 14.
4
Approaches and considerations for the assessment of immunotoxicity for environmental chemicals: a workshop summary.环境化学品免疫毒性评估的方法与考量:研讨会总结
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014 Feb;68(1):96-107. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.11.012. Epub 2013 Nov 23.
5
FIFRA Subdivision F testing Guidelines: are these tests adequate to detect potential hormonal activity for crop protection chemicals? Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.联邦杀虫剂、杀菌剂和灭鼠剂法案第五编F部分测试指南:这些测试足以检测作物保护化学品的潜在激素活性吗?
J Toxicol Environ Health. 1997 Apr 11;50(5):415-31. doi: 10.1080/00984109708983999.
6
Immunotoxicity evaluation by immune function tests: focus on the T-dependent antibody response (TDAR) [Overview of a Workshop Session at the 45th Annual Meeting of the Society of Toxicology (SOT) March 5-9, 2006 San Diego, CA].通过免疫功能测试进行免疫毒性评估:聚焦于T细胞依赖性抗体反应(TDAR)[2006年3月5日至9日在加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥举行的毒理学会(SOT)第45届年会研讨会会议综述]
J Immunotoxicol. 2007 Apr;4(2):143-7. doi: 10.1080/15476910701337308.
7
Use of the dog as non-rodent test species in the safety testing schedule associated with the registration of crop and plant protection products (pesticides): present status.在与农作物和植物保护产品(农药)注册相关的安全性测试计划中,将狗用作非啮齿类试验物种的情况:现状。
Arch Toxicol. 2005 Nov;79(11):615-26. doi: 10.1007/s00204-005-0678-0. Epub 2005 Jun 7.
8
The T-dependent antibody response to keyhole limpet hemocyanin in rodents.啮齿动物对钥孔戚血蓝蛋白的T细胞依赖性抗体反应。
Methods Mol Biol. 2010;598:159-71. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-401-2_11.
9
Concurrent evaluation of general, immune, and genetic toxicity endpoints as part of an integrated testing strategy.作为综合测试策略的一部分,同时评估一般、免疫和遗传毒性终点。
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2014 Aug;55(7):530-41. doi: 10.1002/em.21879. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
10
Is the 90-day dog study necessary for pesticide toxicity testing?是否需要进行 90 天犬毒性试验?
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2023 Apr;53(4):207-228. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2023.2221987. Epub 2023 Jul 4.

引用本文的文献

1
assessment of respiratory burst inhibition by xenobiotic exposure using larval zebrafish.利用幼体斑马鱼评估外源性化学物质对呼吸爆发的抑制作用。
J Immunotoxicol. 2020 Dec;17(1):94-104. doi: 10.1080/1547691X.2020.1748772.