Ellaway Rachel H, Pusic Martin, Yavner Steve, Kalet Adina L
Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Med Educ. 2014 Apr;48(4):386-96. doi: 10.1111/medu.12389.
Conducting research in real life settings (effectiveness studies) can introduce many confounding factors. Efficacy studies seek to control for researcher bias and data quality rather than considering how the efficacy of an intervention is changed by the contexts in which it is used. Relatively little is known about the impact of context on educational interventions, in particular on multimedia learning.
An effectiveness study to understand implementation variance of online educational modules in surgery clerkships was conducted in six US medical schools participating in an efficacy trial of different multimedia designs. Student and teacher experiences were captured through focus groups and one-to-one interviews with trial participants and their teachers. Audio-recordings of these sessions were transcribed and analysed using grounded theory techniques.
Differences were identified in student and teacher perceptions of how the educational intervention had been implemented and how its uptake had been influenced by context-dependent factors: (i) the intervention was implemented in different ways to suit different educational contexts and this influenced how students and teachers responded to it; (ii) the ways students and teachers interacted with, and behaved around, the intervention influenced its uptake; (iii) the way the intervention was perceived by students and teachers influenced its uptake; and (iv) the medium and design of the intervention had a directing influence on its uptake.
It was observed that each institutional context formed a complex educational ecology. The intervention became interwoven with different educational ecologies so that it could no longer be considered a stable variable across the study. We suggest that researchers should conduct implementation-profiling studies in advance of any intervention-based research to account for the constructing nature of educational ecologies on their interventions and in doing so to more clearly differentiate between efficacy and effectiveness studies.
在现实生活环境中开展研究(有效性研究)可能会引入许多混杂因素。疗效研究旨在控制研究者偏差和数据质量,而非考虑干预措施的疗效在其使用背景下是如何变化的。关于背景对教育干预措施的影响,尤其是对多媒体学习的影响,人们了解得相对较少。
在美国六所参与不同多媒体设计疗效试验的医学院开展了一项有效性研究,以了解外科实习中在线教育模块的实施差异。通过焦点小组以及与试验参与者及其教师的一对一访谈,获取了学生和教师的体验。对这些访谈的录音进行了转录,并运用扎根理论技术进行分析。
在学生和教师对教育干预措施的实施方式以及其采用情况如何受到情境相关因素影响的认知方面,发现了差异:(i)干预措施以不同方式实施以适应不同的教育背景,这影响了学生和教师对其的反应;(ii)学生和教师与干预措施互动的方式及其在干预措施周围的行为影响了其采用情况;(iii)学生和教师对干预措施的认知方式影响了其采用情况;(iv)干预措施的媒介和设计对其采用情况有直接影响。
观察到每个机构背景都形成了一个复杂的教育生态。干预措施与不同的教育生态相互交织,以至于在整个研究中它不能再被视为一个稳定的变量。我们建议研究人员在任何基于干预的研究之前应进行实施剖析研究,以考虑教育生态对其干预措施的构建性质,并借此更清晰地区分疗效研究和有效性研究。