Fusch Gerhard, Raja Preeya, Dung Nguyen Quang, Karaolis-Danckert Nadina, Barr Ronald, Fusch Christoph
a Department of Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care , University Children's Hospital , Greifswald , GERMANY.
J Am Coll Nutr. 2013;32(6):407-16. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2013.848156.
Nutritional status provides helpful information of disease severity and treatment effectiveness. Body mass index standard deviation scores (BMI-SDS) provide an approximation of body composition and thus are frequently used to classify nutritional status of sick children and adolescents. However, the accuracy of estimating body composition in this population using BMI-SDS has not been assessed. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the accuracy of nutritional status classification in sick infants and adolescents using BMI-SDS, upon comparison to classification using percentage body fat (%BF) reference charts.
BMI-SDS was calculated from anthropometric measurements and %BF was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for 393 sick children and adolescents (5 months-18 years). Subjects were classified by nutritional status (underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese), using 2 methods: (1) BMI-SDS, based on age- and gender-specific percentiles, and (2) %BF reference charts (standard). Linear regression and a correlation analysis were conducted to compare agreement between both methods of nutritional status classification. %BF reference value comparisons were also made between 3 independent sources based on German, Canadian, and American study populations.
Correlation between nutritional status classification by BMI-SDS and %BF agreed moderately (r (2) = 0.75, 0.76 in boys and girls, respectively). The misclassification of nutritional status in sick children and adolescents using BMI-SDS was 27% when using German %BF references. Similar rates observed when using Canadian and American %BF references (24% and 23%, respectively).
Using BMI-SDS to determine nutritional status in a sick population is not considered an appropriate clinical tool for identifying individual underweight or overweight children or adolescents. However, BMI-SDS may be appropriate for longitudinal measurements or for screening purposes in large field studies. When accurate nutritional status classification of a sick patient is needed for clinical purposes, nutritional status will be assessed more accurately using methods that accurately measure %BF, such as DXA.
营养状况可为疾病严重程度和治疗效果提供有用信息。体重指数标准差评分(BMI-SDS)可近似反映身体成分,因此常用于对患病儿童和青少年的营养状况进行分类。然而,尚未评估使用BMI-SDS评估该人群身体成分的准确性。因此,本研究旨在通过与使用体脂百分比(%BF)参考图表进行分类相比较,评估使用BMI-SDS对患病婴幼儿和青少年营养状况进行分类的准确性。
对393名患病儿童和青少年(5个月至18岁)进行人体测量以计算BMI-SDS,并使用双能X线吸收法(DXA)测量%BF。采用两种方法根据营养状况(体重过轻、正常体重、超重和肥胖)对受试者进行分类:(1)基于年龄和性别的百分位数的BMI-SDS,以及(2)%BF参考图表(标准)。进行线性回归和相关性分析以比较两种营养状况分类方法之间的一致性。还基于德国、加拿大和美国的研究人群对3个独立来源的%BF参考值进行了比较。
BMI-SDS和%BF的营养状况分类之间的相关性中等(男孩和女孩的r²分别为0.75和0.76)。使用德国%BF参考值时,患病儿童和青少年使用BMI-SDS进行营养状况误分类的比例为27%。使用加拿大和美国%BF参考值时观察到相似的比例(分别为24%和23%)。
使用BMI-SDS来确定患病人群的营养状况,对于识别个体体重过轻或超重的儿童或青少年而言,并非合适的临床工具。然而,BMI-SDS可能适用于纵向测量或大型现场研究的筛查目的。当出于临床目的需要对患病患者进行准确的营养状况分类时,使用能准确测量%BF的方法(如DXA)将能更准确地评估营养状况。