Suppr超能文献

为什么人们会退出社区医疗保险?塞内加尔一项探索性家庭调查的结果。

Why do people drop out of community-based health insurance? Findings from an exploratory household survey in Senegal.

机构信息

LSE Health, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2014 Apr;107:78-88. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 Feb 12.

Abstract

Although a high level of drop-out from community-based health insurance (CBHI) is frequently reported, it has rarely been analysed in depth. This study explores whether never having actively participated in CBHI is a determinant of drop-out. A conceptual framework of passive and active community participation in CBHI is developed to inform quantitative data analysis. Fieldwork comprising a household survey was conducted in Senegal in 2009. Levels of active participation among 382 members and ex-members of CBHI across three case study schemes are compared using logistic regression. Results suggest that, controlling for a range of socioeconomic variables, the more active the mode of participation in the CBHI scheme, the stronger the statistically significant positive correlation with remaining enrolled. Training is the most highly correlated, followed by voting, participating in a general assembly, awareness raising/information dissemination and informal discussions/spontaneously helping. Possible intermediary outcomes of active participation such as perceived trustworthiness of the scheme management/president; accountability and being informed of mechanisms of controlling abuse/fraud are also significantly positively correlated with remaining in the scheme. Perception of poor quality of health services is identified as the most important determinant of drop-out. Financial factors do not seem to determine drop-out. The results suggest that schemes may be able to reduce drop-out and increase quality of care by creating more opportunities for more active participation. Caution is needed though, since if CBHI schemes uncritically fund and promote participation activities, individuals who are already more empowered or who already have higher levels of social capital may be more likely to access these resources, thereby indirectly further increasing social inequalities in health coverage.

摘要

尽管社区健康保险(CBHI)的高退保率经常被报道,但很少有深入的分析。本研究探讨了从未积极参与 CBHI 是否是退保的决定因素。开发了一个关于 CBHI 中社区被动和主动参与的概念框架,以指导定量数据分析。2009 年在塞内加尔进行了包括家庭调查在内的实地工作。使用逻辑回归比较了三个案例研究计划中 382 名 CBHI 现有成员和前成员的积极参与水平。结果表明,在控制了一系列社会经济变量后,CBHI 计划参与模式越积极,与继续参保的统计学显著正相关越强。培训的相关性最高,其次是投票、参加大会、提高认识/信息传播以及非正式讨论/自发帮助。积极参与的可能中介结果,如对计划管理/主席的信任程度;问责制以及了解控制滥用/欺诈的机制,与继续参保也呈显著正相关。对医疗服务质量的感知较差被确定为退保的最重要决定因素。财务因素似乎不决定退保。研究结果表明,通过创造更多的机会促进更积极的参与,计划可能能够降低退保率并提高医疗质量。不过需要谨慎,因为如果 CBHI 计划不加批判地资助和促进参与活动,那些已经更有权力或已经具有更高社会资本的人可能更容易获得这些资源,从而间接地进一步加剧健康覆盖方面的社会不平等。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验