• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单工具变量与二元结局的孟德尔随机化中的样本量与效能计算

Sample size and power calculations in Mendelian randomization with a single instrumental variable and a binary outcome.

作者信息

Burgess Stephen

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge

出版信息

Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Jun;43(3):922-9. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu005. Epub 2014 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1093/ije/dyu005
PMID:24608958
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4052137/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sample size calculations are an important tool for planning epidemiological studies. Large sample sizes are often required in Mendelian randomization investigations.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Resources are provided for investigators to perform sample size and power calculations for Mendelian randomization with a binary outcome. We initially provide formulae for the continuous outcome case, and then analogous formulae for the binary outcome case. The formulae are valid for a single instrumental variable, which may be a single genetic variant or an allele score comprising multiple variants. Graphs are provided to give the required sample size for 80% power for given values of the causal effect of the risk factor on the outcome and of the squared correlation between the risk factor and instrumental variable. R code and an online calculator tool are made available for calculating the sample size needed for a chosen power level given these parameters, as well as the power given the chosen sample size and these parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

The sample size required for a given power of Mendelian randomization investigation depends greatly on the proportion of variance in the risk factor explained by the instrumental variable. The inclusion of multiple variants into an allele score to explain more of the variance in the risk factor will improve power, however care must be taken not to introduce bias by the inclusion of invalid variants.

摘要

背景

样本量计算是规划流行病学研究的重要工具。孟德尔随机化研究通常需要大样本量。

方法与结果

为研究人员提供了用于计算二元结局孟德尔随机化样本量和检验效能的资源。我们首先给出连续结局情况的公式,然后给出二元结局情况的类似公式。这些公式适用于单个工具变量,该变量可以是单个基因变异或包含多个变异的等位基因评分。提供了图表,以给出在给定风险因素对结局的因果效应值以及风险因素与工具变量之间的平方相关系数值时,达到80%检验效能所需的样本量。提供了R代码和在线计算器工具,用于根据这些参数计算给定检验效能水平所需的样本量,以及根据选定的样本量和这些参数计算检验效能。

结论

给定检验效能的孟德尔随机化研究所需的样本量在很大程度上取决于工具变量所解释的风险因素方差比例。将多个变异纳入等位基因评分以解释更多风险因素方差将提高检验效能,然而必须注意避免因纳入无效变异而引入偏差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dbf/4052137/741989621fe5/dyu005f2p.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dbf/4052137/77a57be8541c/dyu005f1p.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dbf/4052137/741989621fe5/dyu005f2p.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dbf/4052137/77a57be8541c/dyu005f1p.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dbf/4052137/741989621fe5/dyu005f2p.jpg

相似文献

1
Sample size and power calculations in Mendelian randomization with a single instrumental variable and a binary outcome.单工具变量与二元结局的孟德尔随机化中的样本量与效能计算
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Jun;43(3):922-9. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu005. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
2
Power and sample size calculations for Mendelian randomization studies using one genetic instrument.使用单个遗传工具进行孟德尔随机化研究的功效和样本量计算。
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;42(4):1157-63. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt110. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
3
Use of allele scores as instrumental variables for Mendelian randomization.利用等位基因分数作为孟德尔随机化的工具变量。
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;42(4):1134-44. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt093.
4
Mendelian randomization with a binary exposure variable: interpretation and presentation of causal estimates.孟德尔随机化分析二分类暴露变量:因果估计的解释与呈现。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2018 Oct;33(10):947-952. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0424-6. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
5
A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization.孟德尔随机化中工具变量估计量的综述。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Oct;26(5):2333-2355. doi: 10.1177/0962280215597579. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
6
Efficient design for Mendelian randomization studies: subsample and 2-sample instrumental variable estimators.孟德尔随机化研究的有效设计:亚组和 2 样本工具变量估计量。
Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Oct 1;178(7):1177-84. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt084. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
7
Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression.使用无效工具变量的孟德尔随机化:通过Egger回归进行效应估计和偏差检测
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;44(2):512-25. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv080. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
8
Calculating statistical power in Mendelian randomization studies.计算孟德尔随机化研究中的统计效能。
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Oct;42(5):1497-501. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt179.
9
Bayesian methods for instrumental variable analysis with genetic instruments ('Mendelian randomization'): example with urate transporter SLC2A9 as an instrumental variable for effect of urate levels on metabolic syndrome.贝叶斯方法在遗传工具(“孟德尔随机化”)的工具变量分析中的应用:以尿酸转运蛋白 SLC2A9 作为工具变量来研究尿酸水平对代谢综合征的影响为例。
Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Jun;39(3):907-18. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp397. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
10
MR-BOIL: Causal inference in one-sample Mendelian randomization for binary outcome with integrated likelihood method.MR-BOIL:基于似然集成法的单样本孟德尔随机化二分类结局因果推断。
Genet Epidemiol. 2023 Jun;47(4):332-357. doi: 10.1002/gepi.22520. Epub 2023 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Multi-Ancestry Mendelian Randomization Reveals Lipid-Associated Genetic Risk Factors for COPD.多血统孟德尔随机化研究揭示慢性阻塞性肺疾病的脂质相关遗传危险因素。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2025 Aug 27;20:2979-2992. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S532361. eCollection 2025.
2
Causal Association of Free Triiodothyronine Level with Ischemic Stroke Outcome: A Mendelian Randomization Study.游离三碘甲状腺原氨酸水平与缺血性卒中结局的因果关联:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
Life (Basel). 2025 Aug 16;15(8):1303. doi: 10.3390/life15081303.
3
Constipation and Parkinson disease: A 2-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of allele scores as instrumental variables for Mendelian randomization.利用等位基因分数作为孟德尔随机化的工具变量。
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;42(4):1134-44. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt093.
2
Power and sample size calculations for Mendelian randomization studies using one genetic instrument.使用单个遗传工具进行孟德尔随机化研究的功效和样本量计算。
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;42(4):1157-63. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt110. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
3
Efficient design for Mendelian randomization studies: subsample and 2-sample instrumental variable estimators.
便秘与帕金森病:一项两样本双向孟德尔随机化分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 22;104(34):e43240. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043240.
4
Association between antidiabetic drug targets and psychiatric disorders.抗糖尿病药物靶点与精神障碍之间的关联。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2025 Aug 25;11(1):116. doi: 10.1038/s41537-025-00664-4.
5
Causal Relationship Between Serum Zinc Levels and Diabetic Kidney Disease (DKD): A Plasma Proteomics Mediation Study.血清锌水平与糖尿病肾病(DKD)之间的因果关系:一项血浆蛋白质组学中介研究
Biol Trace Elem Res. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1007/s12011-025-04782-z.
6
Research progress of Mendelian randomization analysis for glaucoma etiology.青光眼病因的孟德尔随机化分析研究进展
Int J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 18;18(7):1383-1397. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2025.07.23. eCollection 2025.
7
Genetically Predicted Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations in Related to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Mendelian Randomization Study.基因预测的血清25-羟基维生素D浓度与2型糖尿病的关系:一项孟德尔随机化研究
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2025 Jul;8(4):e70050. doi: 10.1002/edm2.70050.
8
Decoding the mystery between hyperuricemia and atrial fibrillation: new causal links through mediating proteomics.解码高尿酸血症与心房颤动之间的奥秘:通过中介蛋白质组学建立新的因果联系。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 May 21;16:1429465. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1429465. eCollection 2025.
9
Association of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists with atrial fibrillation, cardiac arrest, and ventricular fibrillation: Casual evidence from a drug target Mendelian randomization.胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂与心房颤动、心脏骤停和心室颤动的关联:来自药物靶点孟德尔随机化的因果证据
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2025 May 29;17(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s13098-025-01712-w.
10
Associations between psoriasis and risk of 33 cancers: a Mendelian randomization study.银屑病与33种癌症风险之间的关联:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
BMC Cancer. 2025 May 7;25(1):837. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14243-4.
孟德尔随机化研究的有效设计:亚组和 2 样本工具变量估计量。
Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Oct 1;178(7):1177-84. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt084. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
4
Identifying the odds ratio estimated by a two-stage instrumental variable analysis with a logistic regression model.用逻辑回归模型识别两阶段工具变量分析估计的优势比。
Stat Med. 2013 Nov 30;32(27):4726-47. doi: 10.1002/sim.5871. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
5
Use of Mendelian randomisation to assess potential benefit of clinical intervention.使用孟德尔随机化方法评估临床干预的潜在益处。
BMJ. 2012 Nov 6;345:e7325. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7325.
6
Severity of bias of a simple estimator of the causal odds ratio in Mendelian randomization studies.孟德尔随机化研究中简单因果比值估计的偏差严重程度。
Stat Med. 2013 Mar 30;32(7):1246-58. doi: 10.1002/sim.5659. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
7
Improving bias and coverage in instrumental variable analysis with weak instruments for continuous and binary outcomes.利用弱工具变量提高连续和二分类结局的工具变量分析中的偏倚和覆盖度。
Stat Med. 2012 Jul 10;31(15):1582-600. doi: 10.1002/sim.4498. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
8
Missing data methods in Mendelian randomization studies with multiple instruments.孟德尔随机化研究中多重工具的缺失数据方法。
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Nov 1;174(9):1069-76. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr235. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
9
Instrumental variable estimation of causal risk ratios and causal odds ratios in Mendelian randomization analyses.工具变量法在孟德尔随机化分析中因果风险比和因果优势比的估计。
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Jun 15;173(12):1392-403. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr026. Epub 2011 May 9.
10
Two-stage instrumental variable methods for estimating the causal odds ratio: analysis of bias.两阶段工具变量法估计因果比值:偏倚分析。
Stat Med. 2011 Jul 10;30(15):1809-24. doi: 10.1002/sim.4241. Epub 2011 Apr 15.