Department of Pest Control, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway,
Parasitol Res. 2014 May;113(5):1847-61. doi: 10.1007/s00436-014-3833-9. Epub 2014 Mar 8.
How head lice infestations are managed by households is an important but generally neglected issue in head lice research. In the present study, we investigate actions taken against head lice by Norwegian households in association with socioeconomic status, family background, school-related variables and other key factors. Repeat questionnaires distributed to caretakers of the same elementary school children during a 2-year period enabled us to study both previous head lice management and any changes in this management through time. Households from 12 schools spanning the main socioeconomic variation found in Norway participated in the study. All students with active head lice infestation were treated in the four investigated periods. Most caretakers used a thorough head lice checking technique and informed others of own infestation. Checking frequency was low as most children were inspected less than monthly. The best determinant of increased checking frequency and thoroughness was personal experience with head lice. The increased awareness, however, seemed to be somewhat short-lived, as there was a decrease in checking frequency and thoroughness within 1 year after infestation. Personal experience with head lice also increased general knowledge related to the parasite. Parents born in developing countries checked their children for head lice more frequently, although less thoroughly, informed fewer contacts when infested, used pediculicides preventively more often and knew less about head lice than parents born in developed countries. Households with highly educated mothers had a lower checking frequency, but their knowledge and willingness to inform others was high. Single parents were more concerned about economic costs and kept children home from school longer while infested than other parents. As head lice management varied among socioeconomic groups and with parental background, differentiated advice should be considered in the control of head lice. The biannual focus on head lice during the 2 years of investigation increased checking thoroughness, while checking frequency remained unchanged. Based on the results, we suggest new head lice management guidelines for health authorities.
家庭如何处理头虱感染是头虱研究中一个重要但通常被忽视的问题。在本研究中,我们调查了挪威家庭针对头虱采取的行动,这些行动与社会经济地位、家庭背景、与学校相关的变量和其他关键因素有关。在两年的时间里,我们向同一所小学的照顾者重复发放问卷,以便研究头虱管理的先前情况以及随着时间的推移对此类管理的任何变化。参与研究的来自挪威主要社会经济差异范围内的 12 所学校的家庭。在四个调查期内,所有患有活动性头虱感染的学生都接受了治疗。大多数照顾者使用彻底的头虱检查技术,并告知他人自己的感染情况。检查频率较低,因为大多数孩子每月检查不到一次。增加检查频率和彻底性的最佳决定因素是个人对头虱的经验。然而,这种意识似乎只是暂时的,因为在感染后一年内,检查频率和彻底性都有所下降。个人对头虱的经验也增加了与寄生虫有关的一般知识。出生在发展中国家的父母更频繁地检查孩子是否有头虱,尽管检查不够彻底,在感染时通知的接触者较少,预防性使用杀虫剂的频率更高,并且对头虱的了解不如出生在发达国家的父母。母亲受教育程度较高的家庭检查频率较低,但他们的知识和告知他人的意愿较高。单亲父母在孩子感染时更关心经济成本,让孩子在家呆的时间更长,而其他父母则没有。由于头虱管理因社会经济群体和父母背景而异,因此应考虑针对头虱控制提供差异化建议。在两年的调查中,每两年关注一次头虱增加了检查的彻底性,而检查频率保持不变。根据研究结果,我们建议卫生当局制定新的头虱管理指南。