Cuspidi Cesare, Facchetti Rita, Bombelli Michele, Sala Carla, Grassi Guido, Mancia Giuseppe
Department of Health Science, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS, Milan, Italy;
Department of Health Science, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy;
Am J Hypertens. 2014 Aug;27(8):1079-86. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpu019. Epub 2014 Mar 8.
Data on the prognostic value of echocardiographic left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVH) as defined by LV wall thickness rather than LV mass estimate are scarce and not univocal. Thus, we investigated the value of LV mass index, wall thickness, and relative wall thickness (RWT) in predicting cardiovascular events in the PAMELA population.
At entry 1,716 subjects underwent diagnostic tests, including laboratory investigations, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring, and echocardiography. For the purpose of this analysis, all subjects were divided into quintiles of LV mass, LV mass/ body surface area (BSA), LV mass/height(2.7), interventricular septum (IVS), posterior wall (PW) thickness, IVS+PW thickness, and RWT.
Over a follow-up of 148 months, 139 nonfatal or fatal cardiovascular events were documented. After adjustment for age, sex, BP, fasting blood glucose, total cholesterol, and use of antihypertensive drugs, only the subjects stratified in the highest quintiles of LV mass indexed to body surface area (BSA) or height(2.7) exhibited a greater likelihood of incident cardiovascular disease (relative risk (RR) = 2.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.05-7.00, P = 0.03; RR = 4.83, 95% CI = 1.45-16.13, P = 0.01, respectively) as compared with the first quintile (reference group). The same was not true for the highest quintiles of IVS, PW thickness, IVS+PW thickness, and RWT. Similar findings were found when echocardiographic parameters were expressed as continuous variables.
This study indicates that LV wall thickness, different from LV mass index, does not provide a reliable estimate of cardiovascular risk associated with LVH in a general population. From these data it is recommended that echocardiographic laboratories should provide a systematic estimate of LV mass index, which is a strong, independent predictor of incident cardiovascular disease.
关于超声心动图以左心室(LV)壁厚度而非左心室质量评估所定义的左心室肥厚(LVH)的预后价值的数据稀缺且不明确。因此,我们在PAMELA人群中研究了左心室质量指数、壁厚度和相对壁厚度(RWT)在预测心血管事件方面的价值。
在入组时,1716名受试者接受了诊断测试,包括实验室检查、24小时动态血压(BP)监测和超声心动图检查。为了本次分析的目的,所有受试者被分为左心室质量、左心室质量/体表面积(BSA)、左心室质量/身高(2.7)、室间隔(IVS)、后壁(PW)厚度、IVS + PW厚度以及RWT的五分位数。
在148个月的随访期间,记录了139例非致命或致命的心血管事件。在对年龄、性别、血压、空腹血糖、总胆固醇和使用抗高血压药物进行调整后,只有那些左心室质量指数按体表面积(BSA)或身高(2.7)分层处于最高五分位数的受试者发生心血管疾病的可能性更大(相对风险(RR)分别为2.72,95%置信区间(CI) = 1.05 - 7.00,P = 0.03;RR = 4.83,95% CI = 1.45 - 16.13,P = 0.01),与第一五分位数(参考组)相比。IVS、PW厚度、IVS + PW厚度和RWT的最高五分位数情况并非如此。当超声心动图参数表示为连续变量时,也发现了类似的结果。
本研究表明,与左心室质量指数不同,左心室壁厚度并不能可靠地评估一般人群中与左心室肥厚相关的心血管风险。基于这些数据,建议超声心动图实验室应系统地评估左心室质量指数,它是心血管疾病发生的一个强有力的独立预测指标。