• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脓毒症和“超级细菌”:我们应该赞成经会阴途径而非经直肠途径进行前列腺活检吗?

Sepsis and 'superbugs': should we favour the transperineal over the transrectal approach for prostate biopsy?

机构信息

Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Cabrini Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2014 Sep;114(3):384-8. doi: 10.1111/bju.12536. Epub 2014 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1111/bju.12536
PMID:24612341
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the rate of hospital re-admission for sepsis after transperineal (TP) biopsy using both local data and worldwide literature, as there is growing interest in TP biopsy as an alternative to transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided biopsy for patients undergoing repeat prostate biopsy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Pooled prospective databases on TP biopsy from multiple centres in Melbourne were queried for rates of re-admission for infection. A literature review of PubMed and Embase was also conducted using the search terms: 'prostate biopsy, fever, infection, sepsis, septicaemia and complications'.

RESULTS

In all, 245 TP biopsies were performed (111 at Alfred Health, 92 at Epworth Healthcare, 38 at Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and four at other institutions). The rate of hospital re-admission for infection was zero. The literature review showed that the rate of sepsis after TRUS biopsy appears to be rising with increasing rates of multi-resistant bacteria found in rectal flora, and is as high as 5%. However, the rate of sepsis from published series of TP biopsy approached zero.

CONCLUSIONS

Both local and international data suggest a negligible rate of sepsis with TP biopsy. This compares to a concerning rise in the rate of sepsis after TRUS biopsy due to the increasing prevalence of multi-resistant bacteria in rectal flora. Although TRUS biopsy is convenient, cheap and quick to perform, we think that TP biopsy should now be offered as an option, not only to patients undergoing repeat prostate biopsy, but to all patients in whom a prostate biopsy is indicated.

摘要

目的

通过当地数据和全球文献,确定经会阴(TP)活检后脓毒症的再入院率,因为越来越多的人对 TP 活检作为经直肠超声(TRUS)引导活检的替代方法感兴趣,适用于接受重复前列腺活检的患者。

患者和方法

对来自墨尔本多个中心的 TP 活检的汇总前瞻性数据库进行了查询,以确定感染再入院的比率。还使用以下搜索词在 PubMed 和 Embase 上进行了文献综述:“前列腺活检、发热、感染、脓毒症、败血症和并发症”。

结果

总共进行了 245 次 TP 活检(111 次在阿尔弗雷德健康中心,92 次在伊普斯威奇保健中心,38 次在彼得麦卡伦癌症中心,4 次在其他机构)。感染的再入院率为零。文献综述表明,随着直肠菌群中发现的多耐药菌的比例增加,TRUS 活检后的脓毒症发生率似乎在上升,高达 5%。然而,从已发表的 TP 活检系列中,脓毒症的发生率接近零。

结论

当地和国际数据均表明 TP 活检后发生脓毒症的几率可忽略不计。相比之下,由于直肠菌群中多耐药菌的流行率不断上升,TRUS 活检后的脓毒症发生率令人担忧。虽然 TRUS 活检方便、便宜且快速,但我们认为现在应该将 TP 活检作为一种选择提供给患者,不仅是接受重复前列腺活检的患者,而且还适用于所有需要进行前列腺活检的患者。

相似文献

1
Sepsis and 'superbugs': should we favour the transperineal over the transrectal approach for prostate biopsy?脓毒症和“超级细菌”:我们应该赞成经会阴途径而非经直肠途径进行前列腺活检吗?
BJU Int. 2014 Sep;114(3):384-8. doi: 10.1111/bju.12536. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
2
Extended-spectrum β-lactamase in the rectal flora of patients undergoing transrectal prostate biopsy: a study of the prevalence in a major metropolitan hospital.经直肠前列腺活组织检查患者直肠菌群中广谱β-内酰胺酶的研究:在一家主要大都市医院的流行情况研究。
BJU Int. 2019 May;123 Suppl 5:43-46. doi: 10.1111/bju.14745. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
3
A Retrospective Comparison of Transrectal and Transperineal Prostate Biopsies: Experience of a Single Surgeon.经直肠与经会阴前列腺穿刺活检的回顾性比较:单外科医生经验。
J Endourol. 2019 Jun;33(6):498-502. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0170.
4
Prevalence of ciprofloxacin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in the intestinal flora of patients undergoing transrectal prostate biopsy in Norwich, UK.英国诺维奇经直肠前列腺活检患者肠道菌群中耐环丙沙星肠杆菌科细菌的患病率。
BJU Int. 2015 Jul;116(1):131-4. doi: 10.1111/bju.12865. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
5
The eternal enigma in prostatic biopsy access route.前列腺活检穿刺路径中的永恒谜题。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2017 Oct 3;89(3):245-246. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2017.3.245.
6
Comparison of complications after transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy: a national population-based study.经直肠和经会阴前列腺活检术后并发症的比较:一项全国基于人群的研究。
BJU Int. 2020 Jul;126(1):97-103. doi: 10.1111/bju.15039. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
7
Ciprofloxacin resistance in the faecal carriage of patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.经直肠超声引导前列腺活检患者粪便携带的环丙沙星耐药性。
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(6):946-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11637.x. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
8
Comparisons of cancer detection rate and complications between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy approaches - a single center preliminary study.经直肠与经会阴前列腺活检术的癌症检出率和并发症比较——单中心初步研究。
BMC Urol. 2019 Oct 28;19(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0539-4.
9
Prevalence of fluoroquinolone-resistant rectal flora in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy: A prospective multicenter study.经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检患者中耐氟喹诺酮直肠菌群的患病率:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Int J Urol. 2018 Mar;25(3):278-283. doi: 10.1111/iju.13511. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
10
Risk factors for infection following prostate biopsy - a case control study.前列腺活检后感染的危险因素——一项病例对照研究
BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Dec 23;15:580. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1328-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-Center Comparative Evaluation of Freehand Transperineal and Transrectal Prostate Biopsy Techniques Performed Under Local Anesthesia.局部麻醉下徒手经会阴与经直肠前列腺活检技术的单中心比较评估
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 31;15(15):1929. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15151929.
2
Antibiotic prophylaxis may be still required among transperineal prostate biopsies of diabetics: a cohort study.一项队列研究表明,糖尿病患者经会阴前列腺活检可能仍需预防性使用抗生素。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 4;12:1618631. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1618631. eCollection 2025.
3
Patient-reported outcome measures for pain and tolerability of transperineal prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia using the PrecisionPoint™ transperineal access system: A prospective study for a real-world patient experience.
使用PrecisionPoint™经会阴穿刺系统对局部麻醉下经会阴前列腺活检的疼痛和耐受性进行患者报告结局测量:一项关于真实患者体验的前瞻性研究。
Investig Clin Urol. 2025 Jul;66(4):311-319. doi: 10.4111/icu.20250077.
4
Risk factors for 30-day unplanned readmissions after surgical procedures in the elderly population.老年人群外科手术后30天内非计划再入院的危险因素。
Patient Saf Surg. 2025 Jul 1;19(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13037-025-00442-2.
5
Freehand Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Improves the Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.徒手经会阴前列腺穿刺活检提高了临床显著性前列腺癌的检出率。
Urol Res Pract. 2025 Mar 7;50(5):269-274. doi: 10.5152/tud.2025.24026.
6
Transperineal prostate biopsy under local vs general anaesthesia: a cost-effectiveness analysis.局部麻醉与全身麻醉下经会阴前列腺活检:成本效益分析
BJU Int. 2025 Jul;136(1):128-134. doi: 10.1111/bju.16722. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
7
Reassessment of approaches to prostate biopsy in the era of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy: insights from the ProBE-PC study.磁共振成像靶向活检时代前列腺活检方法的重新评估:来自ProBE-PC研究的见解
Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Feb 28;14(2):205-209. doi: 10.21037/tau-2024-707. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
8
Prevention of infectious complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: comparison of povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine, and formalin disinfection.经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检术后感染并发症的预防:聚维酮碘、氯己定和福尔马林消毒的比较
World J Urol. 2025 Feb 7;43(1):107. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05498-4.
9
Meta Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Prostate Biopsy: A Comparison Between Transperineal and Transrectal Approach.前列腺活检疗效与安全性的Meta分析:经会阴与经直肠途径的比较
Urol Res Pract. 2025 Jan 3;50(4):208-218. doi: 10.5152/tud.2025.24094.
10
Role of Systematic Biopsy in the Era of Targeted Biopsy: A Review.系统活检在靶向活检时代的作用:综述。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Sep 3;31(9):5171-5194. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31090383.