Suppr超能文献

血小板反应性检测可识别发生二次心血管事件的风险患者:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Platelet-reactivity tests identify patients at risk of secondary cardiovascular events: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Thromb Haemost. 2014 May;12(5):736-47. doi: 10.1111/jth.12538.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antiplatelet therapy is the standard treatment for the prevention of cardiovascular events (CVEs). High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) is a risk factor for secondary CVEs in patients prescribed aspirin and/or clopidogrel. The present review and meta-analysis was aimed at assessing the ability of individual platelet-function tests to reliably identify patients at risk of developing secondary CVEs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies on platelet-reactivity measurements and CVEs. The main inclusion criteria were: (i) prospective study design; (ii) study medication, including aspirin and/or clopidogrel; and (iii) a platelet-function test being performed at baseline, before follow-up started. Of 3882 identified studies, 102 (2.6%; reporting on 44 098 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. With regard to high on-aspirin platelet reactivity (HAPR), 22 different tests were discussed in 55 studies (22 441 patients). Pooled analysis showed that HAPR was diagnosed in 22.2% of patients, and was associated with an increased CVE risk (relative risk [RR] 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.77-2.47). Eleven HAPR tests independently showed a significantly increased CVE risk in patients with HAPR as compared with those with normal on-aspirin platelet reactivity. As regards high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (HCPR), 59 studies (34 776 patients) discussed 15 different tests, and reported that HCPR was present in 40.4% of patients and was associated with an increased CVE risk (RR 2.80; 95% CI 2.40-3.27). Ten tests showed a significantly increased CVE risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HPR are suboptimally protected against future cardiovascular complications. Furthermore, not all of the numerous platelet tests proved to be able to identify patients at increased cardiovascular risk.

摘要

背景

抗血小板治疗是预防心血管事件(CVE)的标准治疗方法。在接受阿司匹林和/或氯吡格雷治疗的患者中,治疗后血小板高反应性(HPR)是发生继发性 CVE 的危险因素。本综述和荟萃分析旨在评估个体血小板功能试验可靠识别发生继发性 CVE 风险患者的能力。

方法和结果

系统地进行了文献检索,以确定关于血小板反应性测量和 CVE 的研究。主要纳入标准为:(i)前瞻性研究设计;(ii)研究药物,包括阿司匹林和/或氯吡格雷;以及(iii)在开始随访之前进行血小板功能测试。在 3882 项确定的研究中,有 102 项(占 2.6%,报告了 44098 例患者)被纳入荟萃分析。关于高阿司匹林反应性(HAPR),在 55 项研究(22441 例患者)中讨论了 22 种不同的测试。汇总分析显示,HAPR 在 22.2%的患者中被诊断,并且与 CVE 风险增加相关(相对风险 [RR] 2.09;95%置信区间 [CI] 1.77-2.47)。11 项 HAPR 测试独立显示,与正常阿司匹林反应性血小板相比,HAPR 患者的 CVE 风险显著增加。关于高氯吡格雷反应性血小板(HCPR),59 项研究(34776 例患者)讨论了 15 种不同的测试,报告 HCPR 存在于 40.4%的患者中,与 CVE 风险增加相关(RR 2.80;95%CI 2.40-3.27)。有 10 项测试显示出明显增加的 CVE 风险。

结论

HPR 患者对未来心血管并发症的保护作用不理想。此外,并非所有众多的血小板测试都能够识别出心血管风险增加的患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验