Suppr超能文献

氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林与单用阿司匹林预防心血管事件的比较

Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone for preventing cardiovascular events.

作者信息

Squizzato Alessandro, Bellesini Marta, Takeda Andrea, Middeldorp Saskia, Donadini Marco Paolo

机构信息

Research Center on Thromboembolic Disorders and Antithrombotic Therapies, Department of Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Insubria, c/o Medicina 1, ASST Settelaghi Ospedale di Circolo, viale Borri, 57, Varese, Italy, 21100.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 14;12(12):CD005158. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005158.pub4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aspirin is the prophylactic antiplatelet drug of choice for people with cardiovascular disease. Adding a second antiplatelet drug to aspirin may produce additional benefit for people at high risk and people with established cardiovascular disease. This is an update to a previously published review from 2011.

OBJECTIVES

To review the benefit and harm of adding clopidogrel to aspirin therapy for preventing cardiovascular events in people who have coronary disease, ischaemic cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease, or were at high risk of atherothrombotic disease, but did not have a coronary stent.

SEARCH METHODS

We updated the searches of CENTRAL (2017, Issue 6), MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 to 4 July 2017) and Embase (Ovid, 1947 to 3 July 2017) on 4 July 2017. We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO ICTRP portal, and handsearched reference lists. We applied no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials comparing over 30 days use of aspirin plus clopidogrel with aspirin plus placebo or aspirin alone in people with coronary disease, ischaemic cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease, or at high risk of atherothrombotic disease. We excluded studies including only people with coronary drug-eluting stent (DES) or non-DES, or both.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We collected data on mortality from cardiovascular causes, all-cause mortality, fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction, fatal and non-fatal ischaemic stroke, major and minor bleeding. The overall treatment effect was estimated by the pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI), using a fixed-effect model (Mantel-Haenszel); we used a random-effects model in cases of moderate or severe heterogeneity (I ≥ 30%). We assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach. We used GRADE profiler (GRADE Pro) to import data from Review Manager to create a 'Summary of findings' table.

MAIN RESULTS

The search identified 13 studies in addition to the two studies in the previous version of our systematic review. Overall, we included data from 15 trials with 33,970 people. We completed a 'Risk of bias' assessment for all studies. The risk of bias was low in four trials because they were at low risk of bias for all key domains (random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, selective outcome reporting and incomplete outcome data), even if some of them were funded by the pharmaceutical industry.Analysis showed no difference in the effectiveness of aspirin plus clopidogrel in preventing cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.10; participants = 31,903; studies = 7; moderate quality evidence), and no evidence of a difference in all-cause mortality (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.25; participants = 32,908; studies = 9; low quality evidence).There was a lower risk of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction with clopidogrel plus aspirin compared with aspirin plus placebo or aspirin alone (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.90; participants = 16,175; studies = 6; moderate quality evidence). There was a reduction in the risk of fatal and non-fatal ischaemic stroke (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.91; participants = 4006; studies = 5; moderate quality evidence).However, there was a higher risk of major bleeding with clopidogrel plus aspirin compared with aspirin plus placebo or aspirin alone (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.25 to 1.64; participants = 33,300; studies = 10; moderate quality evidence) and of minor bleeding (RR 2.03, 95% CI 1.75 to 2.36; participants = 14,731; studies = 8; moderate quality evidence).Overall, we would expect 13 myocardial infarctions and 23 ischaemic strokes be prevented for every 1000 patients treated with the combination in a median follow-up period of 12 months, but 9 major bleeds and 33 minor bleeds would be caused during a median follow-up period of 10.5 and 6 months, respectively.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence demonstrates that the use of clopidogrel plus aspirin in people at high risk of cardiovascular disease and people with established cardiovascular disease without a coronary stent is associated with a reduction in the risk of myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke, and an increased risk of major and minor bleeding compared with aspirin alone. According to GRADE criteria, the quality of evidence was moderate for all outcomes except all-cause mortality (low quality evidence) and adverse events (very low quality evidence).

摘要

背景

阿司匹林是心血管疾病患者预防性抗血小板治疗的首选药物。对于高危人群和已确诊心血管疾病的患者,在阿司匹林基础上加用第二种抗血小板药物可能会带来更多益处。这是对2011年发表的一篇综述的更新。

目的

评价在阿司匹林治疗基础上加用氯吡格雷预防冠心病、缺血性脑血管病、外周动脉疾病患者或动脉粥样硬化血栓形成疾病高危但未置入冠状动脉支架患者心血管事件的获益与危害。

检索方法

2017年7月4日更新了对Cochrane系统评价数据库(CENTRAL,2017年第6期)、MEDLINE(Ovid,1946年至2017年7月4日)和Embase(Ovid,1947年至2017年7月3日)的检索。还检索了ClinicalTrials.gov和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台,并手工检索了参考文献列表。未设语言限制。

选择标准

纳入所有比较阿司匹林加氯吡格雷使用超过30天与阿司匹林加安慰剂或单用阿司匹林,用于冠心病、缺血性脑血管病、外周动脉疾病患者或动脉粥样硬化血栓形成疾病高危患者的随机对照试验。排除仅纳入冠状动脉药物洗脱支架(DES)或非DES患者或两者均有的研究。

数据收集与分析

收集心血管原因死亡率、全因死亡率、致死性和非致死性心肌梗死、致死性和非致死性缺血性卒中、大出血和小出血的数据。采用固定效应模型(Mantel-Haenszel)通过合并风险比(RR)及95%置信区间(CI)估计总体治疗效果;在中度或重度异质性(I²≥30%)情况下采用随机效应模型。采用GRADE方法评估证据质量。使用GRADEprofiler(GRADE Pro)从Review Manager导入数据以创建“结果总结”表。

主要结果

检索除了我们系统评价上一版中的两项研究外,还识别出13项研究。总体而言,我们纳入了15项试验共33970例患者的数据。对所有研究进行了“偏倚风险”评估。4项试验的偏倚风险较低,因为它们在所有关键领域(随机序列产生、分配隐藏、盲法、选择性报告结果和不完整结果数据)的偏倚风险均较低,即使其中一些由制药行业资助。分析显示,阿司匹林加氯吡格雷在预防心血管死亡方面的有效性无差异(RR=0.98,95%CI0.88至1.10;参与者=31903;研究=7;中等质量证据),且全因死亡率无差异的证据(RR=1.05,95%CI0.87至1.25;参与者=32908;研究=9;低质量证据)。与阿司匹林加安慰剂或单用阿司匹林相比,氯吡格雷加阿司匹林组致死性和非致死性心肌梗死风险较低(RR=0.78,95%CI0.69至0.90;参与者=16175;研究=6;中等质量证据)。致死性和非致死性缺血性卒中风险降低(RR=0.73,95%CI0.59至0.91;参与者=4006;研究=5;中等质量证据)。然而,与阿司匹林加安慰剂或单用阿司匹林相比,氯吡格雷加阿司匹林组大出血风险较高(RR=1.44,95%CI1.25至1.64;参与者=33300;研究=10;中等质量证据),小出血风险也较高(RR=2.03,95%CI1.75至2.36;参与者=14731;研究=8;中等质量证据)。总体而言,在中位随访期12个月时,预计每治疗1000例患者,联合用药可预防13例心肌梗死和23例缺血性卒中,但在中位随访期10.5个月和6个月时,分别会导致9例大出血和33例小出血。

作者结论

现有证据表明,在无冠状动脉支架的心血管疾病高危患者和已确诊心血管疾病患者中,氯吡格雷加阿司匹林与单用阿司匹林相比,可降低心肌梗死和缺血性卒中风险,但大出血和小出血风险增加。根据GRADE标准,除全因死亡率(低质量证据)和不良事件(极低质量证据)外,所有结局的证据质量均为中等。

相似文献

5
Patient education in the management of coronary heart disease.冠心病管理中的患者教育
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 28;6(6):CD008895. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008895.pub3.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验