• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

既往冠状动脉支架置入术不会增加非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的早期和长期不良结局:一项倾向评分匹配比较。

Previous coronary stents do not increase early and long-term adverse outcomes in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a propensity-matched comparison.

作者信息

Fukui Toshihiro, Tanaka Sachiko, Takanashi Shuichiro

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan.

EBM Research Center, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Nov;148(5):1843-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.02.004
PMID:24613166
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to compare the early and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with and without previous coronary stents.

METHODS

Between September 2004 and September 2011, 269 patients with previous stents underwent first-time isolated off-pump CABG. These patients were compared with 897 patients without previous stent. A propensity score-matching analysis was performed to compare early and late outcomes between the groups. Mean follow-up time was 43.4 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Patients with previous stents were more likely to be men (85.9% in the stent group vs 79.4% in the no-stent group; P=.022) and more likely to have prior myocardial infarction (60.2% vs 36.8%; P<.001). Mean number of anastomoses was lower in patients with previous stents than in patients without previous stents (4.0 vs 4.2; P=.037). There was no difference in the use of bilateral internal thoracic artery graft between the groups (88.8% vs 89.1%; P>.999). After propensity adjustment for preoperative characteristics, both operative death (0.7% vs 1.5%; P=.414) and the major complications rates (7.8% vs 7.5%; P=.869) were similar between the groups. The actuarial survival rate at 7 years was not different between the groups (87.2%±3.2% vs 84.8%±2.9%; P=.470). Furthermore, freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 7 years were similar between the groups (78.9%±3.8% vs 77.6%±3.3%; P=.811).

CONCLUSIONS

Previous coronary stents do not increase early and long-term morbidity or mortality in patients undergoing off-pump CABG.

摘要

目的

我们研究的目的是比较接受非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的患者,有或没有冠状动脉支架植入史的早期和长期结果。

方法

在2004年9月至2011年9月期间,269例有支架植入史的患者首次接受非体外循环CABG。这些患者与897例无支架植入史的患者进行比较。进行倾向得分匹配分析以比较两组之间的早期和晚期结果。术后平均随访时间为43.4个月。

结果

有支架植入史的患者男性比例更高(支架组为85.9%,无支架组为79.4%;P = 0.022),且更有可能有既往心肌梗死病史(60.2%对36.8%;P < 0.001)。有支架植入史的患者平均吻合口数量低于无支架植入史的患者(4.0对4.2;P = 0.037)。两组之间双侧胸廓内动脉移植的使用情况无差异(88.8%对89.1%;P > 0.999)。在对术前特征进行倾向调整后,两组之间的手术死亡率(0.7%对1.5%;P = 0.414)和主要并发症发生率(7.8%对7.5%;P = 0.869)相似。两组7年的精算生存率无差异(87.2%±3.2%对84.8%±2.9%;P = 0.470)。此外,两组7年时无重大不良心脑血管事件的发生率相似(78.9%±3.8%对77.6%±3.3%;P = 0.811)。

结论

既往冠状动脉支架植入史不会增加接受非体外循环CABG患者的早期和长期发病率或死亡率。

相似文献

1
Previous coronary stents do not increase early and long-term adverse outcomes in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a propensity-matched comparison.既往冠状动脉支架置入术不会增加非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的早期和长期不良结局:一项倾向评分匹配比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Nov;148(5):1843-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
2
On-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left main stem disease: a propensity score analysis.在左主干病变患者中进行体外循环和非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术:倾向评分分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Jun;143(6):1382-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.07.035. Epub 2011 Aug 16.
3
Off-pump bilateral skeletonized internal thoracic artery grafting in patients with chronic kidney disease.慢性肾脏病患者的非体外循环双侧带蒂内乳动脉旁路移植术。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Aug;150(2):315-21.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.04.058. Epub 2015 May 9.
4
Is the second internal thoracic artery better than the radial artery in total arterial off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting? A propensity score-matched follow-up study.在非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术中,第二根胸廓内动脉是否优于桡动脉?一项倾向评分匹配的随访研究。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Feb;147(2):632-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.02.012. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
5
Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for ostial/midshaft lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery from the DELTA registry: a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.DELTA 注册研究:非保护左主干冠状动脉开口/中段病变行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期临床结果:多中心注册研究评估左主干病变的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Apr;7(4):354-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.11.014. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
6
Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass surgery with bilateral or single internal mammary artery grafts.杂交冠状动脉血运重建术与双侧或单根内乳动脉旁路移植术治疗冠心病的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Apr;151(4):1081-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.10.061. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
7
Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery: the DELTA Registry (drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease): a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗开口/中段病变与无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期临床结局:DELTA 注册研究(左主干冠状动脉疾病药物洗脱支架):一项多中心注册研究,评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干的疗效。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.005.
8
Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting attenuates morbidity and mortality for patients with low and high body mass index.非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术降低了低和高身体质量指数患者的发病率和死亡率。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Dec;146(6):1442-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.035. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
9
Revascularization in left main coronary artery disease: comparison of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting vs percutaneous coronary intervention.左主干冠状动脉疾病血运重建:非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Oct;44(4):718-24. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt054. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
10
On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with preoperative anemia.体外循环与非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗术前贫血患者的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Apr;149(4):1018-26.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.12.049. Epub 2014 Dec 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Late Myocardial Infarction and Repeat Revascularization after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients with Prior Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.既往接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者冠状动脉旁路移植术后的晚期心肌梗死和重复血运重建
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 28;11(19):5755. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195755.
2
Prior percutaneous coronary intervention and outcomes in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis of 308,284 patients.冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者先前的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗及预后:对308,284例患者的荟萃分析
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2022 May 13;13:20406223221078755. doi: 10.1177/20406223221078755. eCollection 2022.
3
Long-term survival in patients who had CABG with or without prior coronary artery stenting.
接受或未接受过冠状动脉支架植入术的冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的长期生存情况。
Open Heart. 2020 Nov;7(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001160.
4
Does Prior Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Influence the Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery?既往经皮冠状动脉介入治疗是否会影响冠状动脉旁路移植术的结果?
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Feb 1;35(1):1-8. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0234.
5
Impact of prior coronary stenting on the outcome of subsequent coronary artery bypass grafting.既往冠状动脉支架置入术对后续冠状动脉旁路移植术结局的影响。
Biomed J. 2017 Jun;40(3):178-184. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2016.12.005. Epub 2017 May 31.
6
Immediate Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing CABG; Investigating the Role of Prior Coronary Stenting.冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的术后即刻并发症;探讨既往冠状动脉支架置入术的作用
J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2014;6(4):229-34. doi: 10.15171/jcvtr.2014.017. Epub 2014 Dec 30.