Suppr超能文献

左心室收缩功能严重降低患者的经导管主动脉瓣植入术:单中心经验

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severely reduced left ventricular systolic function: a single-center experience.

作者信息

El-Mawardy Mohamed, Wübken-Kleinfeld Nora, Schwarz Bettina, Gordian Ken, Stöcker Björn, Sier Holger, Toelg Ralph, Geist Volker, Kraatz Ernst-Günther, Richardt Gert, Abdel-Wahab Mohamed

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Heart Center, Segeberger Kliniken GmbH (Academic Teaching Hospital of the Universities of Kiel and Hamburg), Bad Segeberg, Germany,

出版信息

Clin Res Cardiol. 2014 Aug;103(8):621-30. doi: 10.1007/s00392-014-0691-5. Epub 2014 Mar 11.

Abstract

AIMS

Current guidelines consider severe systolic left ventricular dysfunction [ejection fraction (EF) ≤20 %; left ventricular dysfunction (LVD)] a contraindication for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TAVI in this extreme risk subset of patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study population (253 patients) was divided into two groups; the LVD group [21 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤20 %] and the control group (232 patients with LVEF >20 %). TAVI was generally performed transfemorally under analgosedation without mechanical circulatory support. Clinical and hemodynamic variables, as well as procedural and follow-up outcomes, were compared, and all events were defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria for event definition. Mean EF in the LVD group was 18.3 ± 2.9 % compared to 50.9 ± 11.3 % in the control group. Patients in the LVD group were younger, more commonly males, had higher logistic EuroSCORE and lower mean aortic pressure gradients. Immediate procedural mortality was low and similar in both groups (0 vs. 2.2 % in the LVD and control group, respectively, p = 0.49). At 30 days, post-procedural vascular and bleeding complications as well as strokes were similar, but all-cause mortality was higher in the LVD group (14.3 vs. 3.4 %, p = 0.05). In the survivors of the LVD group, New York Heart Association functional class and LVEF significantly improved at 30 days and 6 months. Survival at 1 and 2 years was 70.2 vs. 86.0 % and 56.1 vs. 78.3 % in the LVD and control group, respectively (log-rank p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

TAVI without mechanical circulatory support appears feasible, safe and effective in patients with severe aortic stenosis and severe LVD, but short- and long-term mortality remain high. TAVI should be considered a viable treatment option in this subset of extremely compromised patients.

摘要

目的

当前指南将严重收缩期左心室功能障碍(射血分数(EF)≤20%;左心室功能障碍(LVD))视为经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的禁忌证。本研究的目的是评估TAVI在这一极高风险亚组患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法与结果

研究人群(253例患者)分为两组;LVD组(21例左心室射血分数(LVEF)≤20%的患者)和对照组(232例LVEF>20%的患者)。TAVI一般在镇痛镇静下经股动脉进行,无需机械循环支持。比较了临床和血流动力学变量以及手术和随访结果,所有事件均根据瓣膜学术研究联盟的事件定义标准进行定义。LVD组的平均EF为18.3±2.9%,而对照组为50.9±11.3%。LVD组患者更年轻,男性更常见,逻辑欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)更高,平均主动脉压力梯度更低。即刻手术死亡率较低,两组相似(LVD组和对照组分别为0%和2.2%,p = 0.49)。在30天时,术后血管和出血并发症以及中风相似,但LVD组的全因死亡率更高(14.3%对3.4%,p = 0.05)。在LVD组的幸存者中,纽约心脏协会功能分级和LVEF在30天和6个月时显著改善。LVD组和对照组1年和2年的生存率分别为70.2%对86.0%和56.1%对78.3%(对数秩检验p = 0.03)。

结论

在没有机械循环支持的情况下,TAVI在严重主动脉瓣狭窄和严重LVD患者中似乎是可行、安全和有效的,但短期和长期死亡率仍然很高。对于这一极度受损的患者亚组,TAVI应被视为一种可行的治疗选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验