• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术(MIVAT)与机器人辅助经腋窝甲状腺切除术(RATT)后的美容效果及总体满意度:一项前瞻性随机研究。

Cosmetic result and overall satisfaction after minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) versus robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy (RATT): a prospective randomized study.

作者信息

Materazzi Gabriele, Fregoli Lorenzo, Manzini Gabriele, Baggiani Angelo, Miccoli Mario, Miccoli Paolo

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56100, Pisa, Italy,

出版信息

World J Surg. 2014 Jun;38(6):1282-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2483-5.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-014-2483-5
PMID:24615602
Abstract

BACKGROUND

No studies have compared robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy (RATT) and minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) regarding cosmetic outcome and satisfaction

METHODS

Patients matching the inclusion criteria (benign nodule less than 4 cm and thyroid volume less than 30 mL) were randomly allotted to undergo MIVAT (group A) or RATT (group B). Cosmetic result, overall satisfaction, operative time, and complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 62 patients underwent hemithyroidectomy (30 in group A and 32 in group B). All patients were women, with the exception of one man in each group. The mean patient age was 36.9 years (group A) and 32.5 years (group B). Total operative time (intubation-extubation) was shorter in group A (71.6 min) than in group B (120.4 min). Complications included one transient laryngeal nerve injury in each group and one subcutaneous hematoma in group B. Postoperative hospital stay was longer in group B (1.85 days) than in group A (1.15 days). On the PASQ questionnaire, "scar appearance" and "satisfaction with appearance" scores were better in group A than in group B. In the Short Form (SF-36) 36-Item Health Survey Questionnaire, domains of "social activity" and "general health" were better in group B than in group A, whereas "bodily pain" scored higher in group B than in group A.

CONCLUSIONS

RATT seems not to supersede MIVAT in terms of satisfaction when comparing two groups of patients undergoing thyroidectomy for benign disease.

摘要

背景

尚无研究比较机器人辅助经腋窝甲状腺切除术(RATT)和微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术(MIVAT)在美容效果和满意度方面的差异。

方法

符合纳入标准(良性结节小于4 cm且甲状腺体积小于30 mL)的患者被随机分配接受MIVAT(A组)或RATT(B组)。评估美容效果、总体满意度、手术时间和并发症。

结果

共有62例患者接受了半甲状腺切除术(A组30例,B组32例)。除每组各有1名男性外,所有患者均为女性。患者平均年龄A组为36.9岁,B组为32.5岁。A组(71.6分钟)的总手术时间(插管-拔管)比B组(120.4分钟)短。并发症包括每组各1例暂时性喉返神经损伤和B组1例皮下血肿。B组(1.85天)的术后住院时间比A组(1.15天)长。在PASQ问卷中,A组的“疤痕外观”和“外观满意度”得分优于B组。在简短形式(SF-36)36项健康调查问卷中,B组的“社会活动”和“总体健康”领域优于A组,而“身体疼痛”得分B组高于A组。

结论

在比较两组接受良性疾病甲状腺切除术的患者时,RATT在满意度方面似乎并未超过MIVAT。

相似文献

1
Cosmetic result and overall satisfaction after minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) versus robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy (RATT): a prospective randomized study.微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术(MIVAT)与机器人辅助经腋窝甲状腺切除术(RATT)后的美容效果及总体满意度:一项前瞻性随机研究。
World J Surg. 2014 Jun;38(6):1282-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2483-5.
2
Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: a critical analysis of long-term cosmetic results using a validated tool.微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术:使用经过验证的工具对长期美容效果的批判性分析。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019 Mar;101(3):180-185. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0178. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
3
Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized study.微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术与传统甲状腺切除术:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Surg Endosc. 2008 Nov;22(11):2445-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9806-2. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
4
Minimally invasive video assisted thyroidectomy versus endoscopic thyroidectomy via the areola approach: a retrospective analysis of safety, postoperative recovery, and patient satisfaction.微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术与乳晕入路内镜甲状腺切除术的比较:安全性、术后恢复及患者满意度的回顾性分析
Minerva Chir. 2012 Feb;67(1):31-7.
5
Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy for small follicular thyroid nodules.微小滤泡性甲状腺结节的微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术
World J Surg. 2007 Sep;31(9):1743-1750. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9147-7.
6
"Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy. Initial experience in a general surgery department".微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术。普通外科的初步经验
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2009 Mar;394(2):273-7. doi: 10.1007/s00423-008-0325-3. Epub 2008 May 28.
7
[Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: establishment in a thyroid center].[微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术:在一家甲状腺中心的开展]
Chirurg. 2014 Mar;85(3):246-52. doi: 10.1007/s00104-013-2624-7.
8
Postoperative Pain Evaluation After Robotic Transaxillary Thyroidectomy Versus Conventional Thyroidectomy: A Prospective Study.机器人经腋窝甲状腺切除术与传统甲状腺切除术后的疼痛评估:一项前瞻性研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Feb;27(2):146-150. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0461. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
9
Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy compared with conventional thyroidectomy in a general surgery department.普通外科手术中微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术与传统甲状腺切除术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2009 Oct;23(10):2263-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0303-4. Epub 2009 Jan 28.
10
Systematic review with meta-analysis of prospective randomized trials comparing minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) and conventional thyroidectomy (CT).系统评价与荟萃分析前瞻性随机试验比较微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术(MIVAT)和传统甲状腺切除术(CT)。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013 Dec;398(8):1057-68. doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1125-y. Epub 2013 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic Revolution in Thyroid Surgery: An Umbrella Review of Clinical Outcomes.甲状腺手术中的机器人革命:临床结果的综合综述
OTO Open. 2025 May 2;9(2):e70120. doi: 10.1002/oto2.70120. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
2
Advances in the assessment of cosmetic outcomes, sensory alteration in surgical areas, and health-related quality of life of endoscopic thyroidectomy.内镜甲状腺切除术美容效果评估、手术区域感觉改变和与健康相关生活质量的研究进展。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Feb 13;22(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03307-7.
3
Mini-invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy vs robot-assisted transaxillary thryoidectomy: analisys and comparison of safety and outcomes.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic thyroidectomy and neck dissection: past, present, and future.机器人甲状腺切除术和颈部解剖:过去、现在和未来。
Cancer J. 2013 Mar-Apr;19(2):151-61. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e31828aab61.
2
Safety of robotic thyroidectomy approaches: meta-analysis and systematic review.机器人甲状腺切除术方法的安全性:荟萃分析和系统评价。
Head Neck. 2014 Jan;36(1):137-43. doi: 10.1002/hed.23223. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
3
Comparison between transareola singlesite endoscopic thyroidectomy and minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy.乳晕单孔内镜甲状腺切除术与微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术的比较。
微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术与机器人辅助经腋窝甲状腺切除术:安全性和结果的分析与比较。
Updates Surg. 2024 Apr;76(2):573-587. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01732-z. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
4
Radiofrequency ablation of thyroid nodules: prospective cost-effectiveness analysis in comparison to conventional thyroidectomy.甲状腺结节射频消融术与传统甲状腺切除术的前瞻性成本效益分析比较。
Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Nov 24;65(6):752-757. doi: 10.20945/2359-3997000000411. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
5
Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Thyroid Surgery - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.微创甲状腺手术的结果 - 系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Aug 12;12:719397. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.719397. eCollection 2021.
6
Robot-Assisted Thyroidectomy Versus Open Thyroidectomy in the Treatment of Well Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma.机器人辅助甲状腺切除术与开放性甲状腺切除术治疗分化型甲状腺癌的比较。
JSLS. 2021 Jul-Sep;25(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00032.
7
Novel robot-assisted thyroidectomy by a transaxillary gas-insufflation approach (TAGA): a preliminary report.经腋窝充气入路新型机器人辅助甲状腺切除术(TAGA):初步报告
Gland Surg. 2020 Oct;9(5):1267-1277. doi: 10.21037/gs-20-450.
8
Research quality and transparency, outcome measurement and evidence for safety and effectiveness in robot-assisted surgery: systematic review.机器人辅助手术的研究质量与透明度、结果测量以及安全性和有效性证据:系统评价
BJS Open. 2020 Dec 2;4(6):1084-1099. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50352.
9
The effect of robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy (RATT) on body image is better than the conventional approach with cervicotomy: a preliminary report.机器人辅助经腋窝入路甲状腺切除术(RATT)对身体形象的影响优于传统经颈部入路:初步报告。
Updates Surg. 2021 Jun;73(3):1169-1175. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00785-8. Epub 2020 May 12.
10
Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Total Thyroidectomy (mi V.A.T.T.) - Case Series of 48 Patients.微创视频辅助全甲状腺切除术(mi V.A.T.T.)——48例患者的病例系列
Curr Health Sci J. 2016 Jan-Mar;42(1):40-46. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.42.01.06. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
J Int Med Res. 2012;40(6):2213-9. doi: 10.1177/030006051204000619.
4
Technical and oncologic safety of robotic thyroid surgery.机器人甲状腺手术的技术和肿瘤安全性。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Jun;20(6):1927-33. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2850-0. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
5
Robotic transaxillary total thyroidectomy through a single axillary incision.经单一腋窝切口的机器人辅助下经腋窝入路甲状腺全切除术。
Surgery. 2013 May;153(5):705-10. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.10.013. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
6
Why I have abandoned robot-assisted transaxillary thyroid surgery.为何我已放弃机器人辅助经腋窝甲状腺手术。
Surgery. 2012 Dec;152(6):1025-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.08.060.
7
Robotic and endoscopic transaxillary thyroidectomies may be cost prohibitive when compared to standard cervical thyroidectomy: a cost analysis.与标准的颈部甲状腺切除术相比,机器人和内镜经腋窝甲状腺切除术可能费用过高:成本分析。
Surgery. 2012 Dec;152(6):1016-24. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.08.029.
8
Robotic thyroidectomy: must we drive a luxury sedan to arrive at our destination safely?机器人甲状腺切除术:我们是否必须驾驶豪华轿车才能安全抵达目的地?
Thyroid. 2012 Oct;22(10):988-90. doi: 10.1089/thy.2012.2210.com2.
9
Pros of robotic transaxillary thyroid surgery: its impact on cancer control and surgical quality.机器人经腋窝甲状腺手术的优点:其对癌症控制和手术质量的影响。
Thyroid. 2012 Oct;22(10):986-7. doi: 10.1089/thy.2012.2210.com1.
10
Scar perceptions after thyroid and parathyroid surgery: comparison of minimal and conventional approaches.甲状腺和甲状旁腺手术后的疤痕感知:微创与传统方法的比较。
Surgery. 2013 Mar;153(3):400-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.08.008. Epub 2012 Sep 12.