Suppr超能文献

三维对比增强超声用于检测血管内动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)后内漏。

3D contrast enhanced ultrasound for detecting endoleak following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

作者信息

Abbas A, Hansrani V, Sedgwick N, Ghosh J, McCollum C N

机构信息

Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Independent Vascular Services, South Manchester University Hospital Trust, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 May;47(5):487-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.02.002. Epub 2014 Mar 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

CT angiography (CTA) for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) surveillance involves irradiation and nephrotoxic X-ray contrast agents. Three-dimensional contrast enhanced ultrasound (3D CEUS) is a novel imaging technique that may be more sensitive to blood flow detection than CTA or 2D CEUS. 3D CEUS utilises positional information from magnetic field emitters to assemble all ultrasound reflections into a high-definition image. We compared 3D CEUS with CTA for the detection of endoleak and aneurysm expansion following EVAR.

METHODS

3D CEUS (Curefab), 2D CEUS (Philips IU22), and CTA were compared in 30-paired images from 23 patients. Sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive value were calculated for 2D and 3D CEUS against CTA as the 'gold standard'. Pearson correlation was used to compare aneurysm sac diameter. Data were analysed using SPSS version 19.0.

RESULTS

30 paired 3D CEUS and CTA images were analysed from 23 patients. Endoleaks were detected in 17 images with CTA, 18 on 2D CEUS, and 18 on 3D CEUS. The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values of 3D CEUS to detect endoleak were 100%, 92%, 94%, and 100%, respectively. There was excellent correlation (r=0.935; p≤.0001) between CTA and 3D CEUS for AAA sac diameter. Only 3D CEUS detected the inflow and outflow arteries in all 18 scans with endoleak. 2D CEUS detected the inflow in 16 (88.8%) and CTA on 12 (66.6%) of the images.

CONCLUSION

3D CEUS may be more sensitive to endoleak following EVAR than either 2D CEUS or CTA.

摘要

目的

用于血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)监测的CT血管造影(CTA)涉及辐射和具有肾毒性的X射线造影剂。三维对比增强超声(3D CEUS)是一种新型成像技术,在血流检测方面可能比CTA或二维对比增强超声(2D CEUS)更敏感。3D CEUS利用来自磁场发射器的位置信息将所有超声反射组合成高清图像。我们比较了3D CEUS与CTA在检测EVAR后内漏和动脉瘤扩大方面的效果。

方法

对23例患者的30对图像进行了3D CEUS(Curefab)、2D CEUS(飞利浦IU22)和CTA的比较。以CTA作为“金标准”,计算2D和3D CEUS的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值。采用Pearson相关性分析比较动脉瘤瘤体直径。使用SPSS 19.0版软件进行数据分析。

结果

分析了23例患者的30对3D CEUS和CTA图像。CTA在17幅图像中检测到内漏,2D CEUS检测到18例,3D CEUS检测到18例。3D CEUS检测内漏的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为100%、92%、94%和100%。CTA与3D CEUS在腹主动脉瘤瘤体直径方面具有极好的相关性(r = 0.935;p≤.0001)。在所有18例存在内漏的扫描中,只有3D CEUS检测到了流入和流出动脉。2D CEUS在16例(88.8%)图像中检测到了流入动脉,CTA在12例(66.6%)图像中检测到了流入动脉。

结论

3D CEUS在检测EVAR后的内漏方面可能比2D CEUS或CTA更敏感。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验