Lee Linda S, Wu Bechien U, Banks Peter A, Kadiyala Vivek, Mehta Shivani, Saltzman John R, Thompson Christopher C, Bellizzi Andrew M
Center for Pancreatic Disease, Brigham and Women's Hospital. Boston, MA, USA.
JOP. 2013 Mar 10;15(2):182-8. doi: 10.6092/1590-8577/2004.
Pancreatic cysts raise concern because of their malignant potential. Our aims were to assess accuracy of DNA analysis in detecting malignant pancreatic cysts at EUS-FNA and to determine whether DNA analysis added to imaging and cyst fluid studies enhanced International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) guidelines for resection of pancreatic cysts.
This is a retrospective study including pancreatic cysts undergoing EUS-FNA and DNA analysis with k-ras and loss of heterozygosity testing. Diagnostic models of 2006 and 2012 IAP guidelines, DNA analysis alone, and DNA combined with 2012 IAP guidelines were developed, and area under receiver operator characteristic curves (AUC) compared to determine the added value of DNA for detecting malignant cysts at the time of EUS-FNA.
Two-hundreds and fifty-seven patients were included with 8 (3.1%) malignant cysts. Solid component (P<0.001), main pancreatic duct dilation (P=0.012), suspicious or malignant cytology (P=0.001), and high DNA quantity (P<0.001) were associated with malignancy. Concurrent high amplitude k-ras with loss of heterozygosity mutations was highly specific (98.4%) though insensitive (12.5%) for malignancy. The 2012 IAP guideline (AUC=0.87; 95% CI: 0.82-0.91) was superior to 2006 IAP guideline (AUC=0.54; 95% CI: 0.47-0.60) and DNA analysis alone (AUC=0.60; 95% CI: 0.53-0.66) for detecting malignant cysts (P=0.004 and P=0.002, respectively). Addition of DNA did not improve performance of the 2012 IAP guideline (AUC=0.84; 95% CI: 0.79-0.88).
Commercial DNA analysis does not add useful information beyond imaging and cytology for detection of malignant pancreatic cysts. The 2012 IAP guideline better predicted malignant cysts than the 2006 IAP guideline.
胰腺囊肿因其恶变潜能而备受关注。我们的目的是评估DNA分析在超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检(EUS-FNA)检测恶性胰腺囊肿中的准确性,并确定DNA分析联合影像学和囊液研究是否能增强国际胰腺病协会(IAP)的胰腺囊肿切除指南。
这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了接受EUS-FNA及k-ras基因和杂合性缺失检测的DNA分析的胰腺囊肿患者。构建了2006年和2012年IAP指南、单独的DNA分析以及DNA联合2012年IAP指南的诊断模型,并比较受试者操作特征曲线(AUC)下面积,以确定DNA在EUS-FNA时检测恶性囊肿的附加价值。
纳入257例患者,其中8例(3.1%)为恶性囊肿。实性成分(P<0.001)、主胰管扩张(P=0.012)、可疑或恶性细胞学结果(P=0.001)和高DNA量(P<0.001)与恶性肿瘤相关。同时存在高振幅k-ras基因与杂合性缺失突变对恶性肿瘤具有高度特异性(98.4%),但敏感性较低(12.5%)。在检测恶性囊肿方面,2012年IAP指南(AUC=0.87;95%CI:0.82-0.91)优于2006年IAP指南(AUC=0.54;95%CI:0.47-0.60)和单独的DNA分析(AUC=0.60;95%CI:0.53-0.66)(分别为P=0.004和P=0.002)。添加DNA并未改善2012年IAP指南的性能(AUC=0.84;95%CI:0.79-0.88)。
对于检测恶性胰腺囊肿,商业DNA分析并未提供超越影像学和细胞学的有用信息。2012年IAP指南比之2006年IAP指南能更好地预测恶性囊肿。