• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估美国胃肠病学会(AGA)和福冈指南关于超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检术(EUS)及偶然发现的胰腺囊肿手术切除的相关内容。

Evaluation of AGA and Fukuoka Guidelines for EUS and surgical resection of incidental pancreatic cysts.

作者信息

Lee Alexander, Kadiyala Vivek, Lee Linda S

机构信息

Texas Digestive Disease Consultants, Dallas, Texas, United States.

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Division of Gastroenteriology, Hepatology, and Endoscopy, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2017 Feb;5(2):E116-E122. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-118703.

DOI:10.1055/s-0042-118703
PMID:28210708
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5305422/
Abstract

Management of asymptomatic pancreatic cysts is challenging. Guidelines by the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) and International Association of Pancreatology (Fukuoka) seek to identify high-risk patients. We assessed performance of these guidelines in selecting patients for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and/or surgery.  PART I - We retrospectively studied 143 asymptomatic cysts with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) followed by EUS. Appropriate selection for EUS was defined as: malignant cytology or surgical pathology, or development of concerning features on MRI as defined by the guidelines. PART II - We retrospectively studied 152 resected cysts to assess the performance of guidelines in selecting cysts for surgery using malignant histology as the outcome.  PART I - Of 143 EUS, 43 (30.1 %) were male with median age 65.0 years (interquartile range [IQR] 58.0 - 73.0). AGA guideline demonstrated lower sensitivity (17.6 % versus 35.3 %,  = 0.03), higher specificity (94.5 % versus 66.1 %, p < 0.001), and higher accuracy (76.2 % versus 58.7 %,  = 0.002) than Fukuoka. There was no difference in positive predictive value (50.0 % versus 24.5 %,  = 0.15) and negative predictive value (78.6 % versus 76.6 %, p=0.75). PART II - Of 152 resected cysts, 45 (29.8 %) were male with median age 59.0 years (IQR 47.3 - 66.7). There was no difference in performance characteristics of the guidelines in selecting cysts for surgery. AGA and Fukuoka guidelines missed 25.0 % and 18.8 % of malignant cysts, respectively ( = 1.00).  For referral to EUS, the AGA guideline was highly specific compared to Fukuoka; both suffered from poor sensitivity, although the Fukuoka guideline was relatively more sensitive than AGA. For referral to surgery, both guidelines have modest sensitivity and specificity and miss a similar percentage of malignant lesions.

摘要

无症状胰腺囊肿的管理具有挑战性。美国胃肠病学会(AGA)和国际胰腺病协会(福冈)发布的指南旨在识别高危患者。我们评估了这些指南在选择接受内镜超声(EUS)检查和/或手术的患者方面的表现。第一部分——我们对143例无症状囊肿患者进行了回顾性研究,这些患者先接受磁共振成像(MRI)检查,随后接受EUS检查。EUS的适当选择定义为:恶性细胞学检查或手术病理检查结果,或MRI出现指南所定义的可疑特征。第二部分——我们对152例已切除的囊肿进行了回顾性研究,以评估指南在以恶性组织学结果为标准选择手术囊肿方面的表现。第一部分——在143例接受EUS检查的患者中,43例(30.1%)为男性,中位年龄65.0岁(四分位间距[IQR]为58.0 - 73.0)。与福冈指南相比,AGA指南的敏感性较低(17.6%对35.3%,P = 0.03),特异性较高(94.5%对66.1%,P < 0.001),准确性也较高(76.2%对58.7%,P = 0.002)。阳性预测值(50.0%对24.5%,P = 0.15)和阴性预测值(78.6%对76.6%,P = 0.75)没有差异。第二部分——在152例已切除的囊肿中,45例(29.8%)为男性,中位年龄59.0岁(IQR为47.3 - 66.7)。在选择手术囊肿方面,指南的表现特征没有差异。AGA和福冈指南分别漏诊了25.0%和18.8%的恶性囊肿(P = 1.00)。对于推荐进行EUS检查,与福冈指南相比,AGA指南具有较高的特异性;两者的敏感性都较差,尽管福冈指南相对AGA指南更敏感一些。对于推荐进行手术,两个指南的敏感性和特异性都一般,且漏诊恶性病变的比例相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a53d/5305422/aa233fd8bdf3/10-1055-s-0042-118703-i649ei4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a53d/5305422/384c7f56827a/10-1055-s-0042-118703-i649ei1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a53d/5305422/7c96d372c266/10-1055-s-0042-118703-i649ei2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a53d/5305422/6945d23ab375/10-1055-s-0042-118703-i649ei3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a53d/5305422/aa233fd8bdf3/10-1055-s-0042-118703-i649ei4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a53d/5305422/384c7f56827a/10-1055-s-0042-118703-i649ei1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a53d/5305422/7c96d372c266/10-1055-s-0042-118703-i649ei2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a53d/5305422/6945d23ab375/10-1055-s-0042-118703-i649ei3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a53d/5305422/aa233fd8bdf3/10-1055-s-0042-118703-i649ei4.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of AGA and Fukuoka Guidelines for EUS and surgical resection of incidental pancreatic cysts.评估美国胃肠病学会(AGA)和福冈指南关于超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检术(EUS)及偶然发现的胰腺囊肿手术切除的相关内容。
Endosc Int Open. 2017 Feb;5(2):E116-E122. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-118703.
2
American Gastroenterological Association guidelines are inaccurate in detecting pancreatic cysts with advanced neoplasia: a clinicopathologic study of 225 patients with supporting molecular data.美国胃肠病学会指南在检测具有高级别肿瘤性的胰腺囊肿方面存在不准确性:一项包含支持分子数据的 225 例患者的临床病理研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jun;83(6):1107-1117.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.12.009. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
3
Fukuoka and AGA Criteria Have Superior Diagnostic Accuracy for Advanced Cystic Neoplasms than Sendai Criteria.福冈标准和美国胃肠病学会(AGA)标准对晚期囊性肿瘤的诊断准确性优于仙台标准。
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Mar;62(3):626-632. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4460-y. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
4
Evaluating the accuracy of three international guidelines in identifying the risk of malignancy in pancreatic cysts: a retrospective analysis of a surgical treated population.评估三种国际指南在识别胰腺囊肿恶性肿瘤风险中的准确性:一项外科治疗人群的回顾性分析。
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2021 Jul-Sep;84(3):443-450. doi: 10.51821/84.3.006.
5
New guidelines for use of endoscopic ultrasound for evaluation and risk stratification of pancreatic cystic lesions may be too conservative.新的内镜超声用于评估和分层胰腺囊性病变风险的指南可能过于保守。
Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2420-2426. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5941-y. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
6
Comparing American Gastroenterological Association Pancreatic Cyst Management Guidelines with Fukuoka Consensus Guidelines as Predictors of Advanced Neoplasia in Patients with Suspected Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms.比较美国胃肠病学会胰腺囊肿管理指南与福冈共识指南对疑似胰腺囊性肿瘤患者高级别肿瘤的预测价值
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Nov;223(5):729-737.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.07.011. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
7
Evaluation of the 2015 AGA guidelines on pancreatic cystic neoplasms in a large surgically confirmed multicenter cohort.在一个大型手术确诊的多中心队列中对2015年美国胃肠病学会胰腺囊性肿瘤指南的评估。
Endosc Int Open. 2017 Mar;5(3):E201-E208. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-122010.
8
Requirement of a single high-risk feature as an indication for EUS for the diagnosis of asymptomatic pancreatic cysts.将单一高危特征作为超声内镜检查(EUS)诊断无症状胰腺囊肿的指征的要求。
Pancreatology. 2016 Nov-Dec;16(6):1015-1019. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2016.08.010. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
9
Prevalence of incidental clinically relevant pancreatic cysts at diagnosis based on current guidelines.根据现行指南,诊断时偶然发现的具有临床相关性的胰腺囊肿的患病率。
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 May;41(5):293-301. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2017.12.005. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
10
Sendai and Fukuoka Consensus Guidelines Identify Advanced Neoplasia in Patients With Suspected Mucinous Cystic Neoplasms of the Pancreas.《仙台与福冈共识指南:可疑胰腺黏液性囊性肿瘤患者的高级别肿瘤》
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Oct;13(10):1808-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.03.017. Epub 2015 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospective, Multi-Institutional, Real-Time Next-Generation Sequencing of Pancreatic Cyst Fluid Reveals Diverse Genomic Alterations That Improve the Clinical Management of Pancreatic Cysts.前瞻性、多机构、实时下一代测序胰腺囊液揭示了多种基因组改变,改善了胰腺囊肿的临床管理。
Gastroenterology. 2023 Jan;164(1):117-133.e7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.09.028. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
2
Updates in diagnosis and management of pancreatic cysts.胰腺囊肿的诊断和治疗进展。
World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Sep 14;27(34):5700-5714. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i34.5700.
3
Comparing accuracy of high-risk features for detecting advanced neoplasia in pancreatic cystic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
American Gastroenterological Association guidelines are inaccurate in detecting pancreatic cysts with advanced neoplasia: a clinicopathologic study of 225 patients with supporting molecular data.美国胃肠病学会指南在检测具有高级别肿瘤性的胰腺囊肿方面存在不准确性:一项包含支持分子数据的 225 例患者的临床病理研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jun;83(6):1107-1117.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.12.009. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
2
A combination of molecular markers and clinical features improve the classification of pancreatic cysts.分子标志物与临床特征相结合可改善胰腺囊肿的分类。
Gastroenterology. 2015 Nov;149(6):1501-10. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.07.041. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
3
比较胰腺囊性病变中检测高级别瘤变的高危特征的准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Gastroenterol. 2021 Sep-Oct;34(5):743-750. doi: 10.20524/aog.2021.0630. Epub 2021 May 27.
4
State-of-the-Art Update of Pancreatic Cysts.胰腺囊肿的最新进展
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 May;67(5):1573-1587. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07084-1. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
5
Pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a review of current recommendations for surveillance and management.胰腺囊性肿瘤:当前监测和管理建议综述。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Aug;46(8):3946-3962. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03030-x. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
6
Multi-Omic Biomarkers as Potential Tools for the Characterisation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions and Cancer: Innovative Patient Data Integration.多组学生物标志物作为胰腺囊性病变和癌症特征化的潜在工具:创新性患者数据整合
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Feb 12;13(4):769. doi: 10.3390/cancers13040769.
7
Novel Methylated DNA Markers Discriminate Advanced Neoplasia in Pancreatic Cysts: Marker Discovery, Tissue Validation, and Cyst Fluid Testing.新型甲基化 DNA 标志物可区分胰腺囊肿中的高级别肿瘤:标志物发现、组织验证和囊液检测。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep;114(9):1539-1549. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000284.
8
Management of incidental pancreatic cysts: which guidelines?偶然发现的胰腺囊肿的管理:遵循哪些指南?
Endosc Int Open. 2017 Mar;5(3):E209-E211. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-102399.
Sendai and Fukuoka Consensus Guidelines Identify Advanced Neoplasia in Patients With Suspected Mucinous Cystic Neoplasms of the Pancreas.
《仙台与福冈共识指南:可疑胰腺黏液性囊性肿瘤患者的高级别肿瘤》
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Oct;13(10):1808-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.03.017. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
4
American gastroenterological association technical review on the diagnosis and management of asymptomatic neoplastic pancreatic cysts.美国胃肠病学会关于无症状性肿瘤性胰腺囊肿诊断与管理的技术审查
Gastroenterology. 2015 Apr;148(4):824-48.e22. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.01.014.
5
American gastroenterological association institute guideline on the diagnosis and management of asymptomatic neoplastic pancreatic cysts.美国胃肠病学会关于无症状性肿瘤性胰腺囊肿诊断与管理的指南
Gastroenterology. 2015 Apr;148(4):819-22; quize12-3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.01.015.
6
Endosonography in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cysts.内镜超声在胰腺囊肿诊断和处理中的应用
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar 16;7(3):213-23. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i3.213.
7
Diagnostic approach to pancreatic cysts.胰腺囊肿的诊断方法
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2014 Sep;30(5):511-7. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000098.
8
Validation of international consensus guidelines for the resection of branch duct-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.验证国际共识指南用于切除分支胰管型导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤。
Br J Surg. 2014 May;101(6):686-92. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9491. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
9
Utility of commercial DNA analysis in detecting malignancy within pancreatic cysts.商业DNA分析在检测胰腺囊肿内恶性肿瘤方面的效用。
JOP. 2013 Mar 10;15(2):182-8. doi: 10.6092/1590-8577/2004.
10
Predicting dysplasia and invasive carcinoma in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: development of a preoperative nomogram.预测胰腺导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤的异型增生和浸润性癌:术前列线图的制定。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Dec;20(13):4348-55. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3207-z. Epub 2013 Sep 18.