• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

EUS-FNA 获得的胰腺囊性液中 KRAS 和 GNAS 分析对 CEA 和细胞学检测的临床影响。

Clinical Impact of KRAS and GNAS Analysis Added to CEA and Cytology in Pancreatic Cystic Fluid Obtained by EUS-FNA.

机构信息

Gastroenterology Department, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil EPE, Rua Prof Lima Basto, 1099-023, Lisbon, Portugal.

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Sep;63(9):2351-2361. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5128-y. Epub 2018 May 24.

DOI:10.1007/s10620-018-5128-y
PMID:29796909
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cysts are common incidental findings with malignant potential, raising diagnostic and treatment dilemmas.

AIMS

To determine the added value of KRAS and GNAS mutation analysis on cyst classification and decision making.

METHODS

We analyzed 52 frozen samples of pancreatic cystic fluid obtained by EUS-FNA between 2008 and 2014. In addition to cytology and CEA, mutations of GNAS (exons 8 and 9) and KRAS (exons 2 and 3) genes were analyzed using Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

There were 52 patients, 67% females, with a mean age of 59 ± 15 years (29-91). Cysts were classified as mucinous in 21 patients (40%) (14 low-risk, seven malignant) and non-mucinous in 31 patients (60%). After EUS-FNA, 11 patients had surgery, six had chemotherapy or palliation, one had endoscopic drainage, and 34 are on follow-up after a mean of 57 months. KRAS mutation was detected in nine and GNAS in two samples. Patients harboring cysts with KRAS mutations were older (p = 0.01), cysts were more commonly mucinous (p = 0.001) and malignant (p = 0.01). KRAS mutations were present in both low-risk and malignant mucinous lesions. For identifying mucinous lesions, CEA > 192 ng/mL performed better (AUC ROC = 93%), whereas for malignant/high-risk mucinous lesions, EUS imaging had the best accuracy (AUC ROC = 88%). After molecular analysis, a modification in cyst classification occurred in ten patients, but was correct in only two, a pseudocyst re-classified as IPMN and a malignant cyst as a non-mucinous cyst.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of patients with pancreatic cysts, KRAS and GNAS mutations had no significant diagnostic benefit in comparison with conventional testing.

摘要

背景

胰腺囊肿是常见的偶发病变,具有恶性潜能,这引发了诊断和治疗方面的难题。

目的

确定 KRAS 和 GNAS 基因突变分析对囊肿分类和决策的附加价值。

方法

我们分析了 2008 年至 2014 年间通过 EUS-FNA 获得的 52 例胰腺囊性液冷冻样本。除了细胞学和 CEA 检测外,还使用 Sanger 测序分析了 GNAS(外显子 8 和 9)和 KRAS(外显子 2 和 3)基因突变。

结果

共纳入 52 例患者(67%为女性),平均年龄为 59±15 岁(29-91 岁)。21 例(40%)患者的囊肿为黏液性,14 例为低危,7 例为恶性;31 例(60%)患者的囊肿为非黏液性。EUS-FNA 后,11 例患者接受了手术,6 例接受了化疗或姑息治疗,1 例接受了内镜引流,34 例患者在平均 57 个月的随访后仍在继续治疗。9 例样本中检测到 KRAS 突变,2 例样本中检测到 GNAS 突变。携带 KRAS 突变的患者年龄更大(p=0.01),囊肿更常见为黏液性(p=0.001)且恶性程度更高(p=0.01)。KRAS 突变存在于低危和恶性黏液性病变中。对于识别黏液性病变,CEA>192ng/mL 的检测效能更好(AUC ROC=93%),而对于恶性/高危黏液性病变,EUS 成像的准确性最高(AUC ROC=88%)。经过分子分析,10 例患者的囊肿分类发生了改变,但仅有 2 例改变是正确的,即一个假性囊肿被重新归类为 IPMN,一个恶性囊肿被归类为非黏液性囊肿。

结论

在本胰腺囊肿患者队列中,与传统检测相比,KRAS 和 GNAS 基因突变在诊断方面没有显著获益。

相似文献

1
Clinical Impact of KRAS and GNAS Analysis Added to CEA and Cytology in Pancreatic Cystic Fluid Obtained by EUS-FNA.EUS-FNA 获得的胰腺囊性液中 KRAS 和 GNAS 分析对 CEA 和细胞学检测的临床影响。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Sep;63(9):2351-2361. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5128-y. Epub 2018 May 24.
2
Value of adding GNAS testing to pancreatic cyst fluid KRAS and carcinoembryonic antigen analysis for the diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.对胰囊液 KRAS 和癌胚抗原分析中添加 GNAS 检测用于诊断导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤的价值。
Dig Endosc. 2017 Jan;29(1):111-117. doi: 10.1111/den.12710. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
3
KRAS/GNAS-testing by highly sensitive deep targeted next generation sequencing improves the endoscopic ultrasound-guided workup of suspected mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas.通过高灵敏度深度靶向新一代测序进行KRAS/GNAS检测可改善胰腺可疑黏液性肿瘤的内镜超声引导检查。
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2021 Jul;60(7):489-497. doi: 10.1002/gcc.22946. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
4
Impact of next-generation sequencing on the clinical diagnosis of pancreatic cysts.下一代测序技术对胰腺囊肿临床诊断的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jan;83(1):140-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.06.047. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
5
Preoperative next-generation sequencing of pancreatic cyst fluid is highly accurate in cyst classification and detection of advanced neoplasia.术前对胰腺囊液进行下一代测序,在囊液分类和检测高级别肿瘤方面具有高度准确性。
Gut. 2018 Dec;67(12):2131-2141. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313586. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
6
American Gastroenterological Association guidelines are inaccurate in detecting pancreatic cysts with advanced neoplasia: a clinicopathologic study of 225 patients with supporting molecular data.美国胃肠病学会指南在检测具有高级别肿瘤性的胰腺囊肿方面存在不准确性:一项包含支持分子数据的 225 例患者的临床病理研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jun;83(6):1107-1117.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.12.009. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
7
Preoperative GNAS and KRAS testing in the diagnosis of pancreatic mucinous cysts.术前 GNAS 和 KRAS 检测在胰腺黏液性囊腺瘤/囊腺癌诊断中的应用。
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Aug 15;20(16):4381-9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0513. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
8
Molecular analysis of EUS-acquired pancreatic cyst fluid for KRAS and GNAS mutations for diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia and mucinous cystic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EUS 获得的胰腺囊液中 KRAS 和 GNAS 突变的分子分析用于诊断导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤和黏液性囊性病变:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 May;93(5):1019-1033.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.12.014. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
9
Integration of KRAS testing in the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions: a clinical experience of 618 pancreatic cysts.KRAS 检测在胰腺囊性病变诊断中的整合:618 例胰腺囊肿的临床经验。
Mod Pathol. 2013 Nov;26(11):1478-87. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2013.91. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
10
Next generation sequencing of the cellular and liquid fraction of pancreatic cyst fluid supports discrimination of IPMN from pseudocysts and reveals cases with multiple mutated driver clones: First findings from the prospective ZYSTEUS biomarker study.下一代测序对胰腺囊液的细胞和液体部分进行分析,有助于鉴别胰腺导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤(IPMN)与假性囊肿,并揭示存在多个突变驱动克隆的病例:来自前瞻性 ZYSTEUS 生物标志物研究的初步发现。
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2019 Jan;58(1):3-11. doi: 10.1002/gcc.22682. Epub 2018 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The World Health Organization System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology: Standardized Categories and Practical Approaches to Pancreatic Lesions.世界卫生组织胰腺胆管细胞病理学报告系统:胰腺病变的标准化分类及实用方法
J Clin Transl Pathol. 2024 Sep;4(3):122-135. doi: 10.14218/jctp.2024.00034. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
2
Diagnostics and Management of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions-New Techniques and Guidelines.胰腺囊性病变的诊断与管理——新技术与指南
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 8;13(16):4644. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164644.
3
Next-generation sequencing of pancreatic cyst wall specimens obtained using micro-forceps for improving diagnostic accuracy.

本文引用的文献

1
Preoperative next-generation sequencing of pancreatic cyst fluid is highly accurate in cyst classification and detection of advanced neoplasia.术前对胰腺囊液进行下一代测序,在囊液分类和检测高级别肿瘤方面具有高度准确性。
Gut. 2018 Dec;67(12):2131-2141. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313586. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
2
Prospective study on the incidence, prevalence and 5-year pancreatic-related mortality of pancreatic cysts in a population-based study.基于人群的研究中胰腺囊肿的发生率、患病率和 5 年胰腺相关死亡率的前瞻性研究。
Gut. 2018 Jan;67(1):138-145. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313127. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
3
Revisions of international consensus Fukuoka guidelines for the management of IPMN of the pancreas.
使用微型镊子获取胰腺囊肿壁标本的下一代测序以提高诊断准确性。
Endosc Int Open. 2023 Oct 12;11(10):E983-E991. doi: 10.1055/a-2163-8805. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
The Use of Integrated Molecular Testing in the Assessment and Management of Pancreatic Cysts.综合分子检测在胰腺囊肿评估和管理中的应用。
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2023 Aug;25(8):182-190. doi: 10.1007/s11894-023-00877-6. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
5
Serial EUS-Guided FNA for the Surveillance of Pancreatic Cysts: A Study of Long-Term Performance of Tumor Markers.超声内镜引导下胰腺囊肿的序贯细针抽吸活检:肿瘤标志物长期性能研究。
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Nov;67(11):5248-5255. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07427-6. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
6
Comprehensive review of diagnostic modalities for early chronic pancreatitis.慢性胰腺炎早期诊断方法的综合评价
World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul 21;27(27):4342-4357. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i27.4342.
7
Methylation changes at the imprinted locus in pancreatic cystic neoplasms are important for the diagnosis of malignant cysts.胰腺囊性肿瘤中印迹基因座的甲基化变化对恶性囊肿的诊断具有重要意义。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020 Sep 15;12(9):1056-1064. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i9.1056.
8
An international, multi-institution survey on performing EUS-FNA and fine needle biopsy.一项关于进行超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检(EUS-FNA)和细针活检的国际多机构调查。
Endosc Ultrasound. 2020 Sep-Oct;9(5):319-328. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_56_20.
9
High-Risk Characteristics Associated with Advanced Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: Results from a Retrospective Surgical Cohort.高危特征与胰腺囊性病变进展相关:一项回顾性手术队列研究结果。
Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Jun;66(6):2075-2083. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06481-2. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
10
Stratifying Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms by Cyst Fluid Analysis: Present and Future.基于囊液分析对导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤进行分层:现状与未来。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Feb 9;21(3):1147. doi: 10.3390/ijms21031147.
国际共识修订版福冈胰腺导管内乳头状黏液瘤管理指南。
Pancreatology. 2017 Sep-Oct;17(5):738-753. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2017.07.007. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
4
DNA testing of pancreatic cyst fluid: is it ready for prime time?胰腺囊液的 DNA 检测:是否已准备好投入使用?
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jan;2(1):63-72. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30084-X. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
5
Predicting the Grade of Dysplasia of Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms Using Cyst Fluid DNA Methylation Markers.使用囊液DNA甲基化标记预测胰腺囊性肿瘤的发育异常分级
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jul 15;23(14):3935-3944. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2244. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
6
Next-generation sequencing adds value to the preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic cysts.下一代测序技术为胰腺囊肿的术前诊断增添了价值。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2017 Jan;125(1):41-47. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21775. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
7
The role of endoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of cystic pancreatic neoplasms.内镜检查在胰腺囊性肿瘤诊断和治疗中的作用。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jul;84(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.04.014. Epub 2016 May 17.
8
A combination of molecular markers and clinical features improve the classification of pancreatic cysts.分子标志物与临床特征相结合可改善胰腺囊肿的分类。
Gastroenterology. 2015 Nov;149(6):1501-10. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.07.041. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
9
Impact of next-generation sequencing on the clinical diagnosis of pancreatic cysts.下一代测序技术对胰腺囊肿临床诊断的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jan;83(1):140-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.06.047. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
10
EUS-Guided FNA for Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: a Meta-Analysis.超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检诊断胰腺囊性病变的Meta分析
Cell Physiol Biochem. 2015;36(3):1197-209. doi: 10.1159/000430290. Epub 2015 Jun 30.