Suppr超能文献

针对辛德毕斯病毒E1和E2糖蛋白的单克隆抗体:表位的定义及对致命性脑炎的保护效果

Monoclonal antibodies to the E1 and E2 glycoproteins of Sindbis virus: definition of epitopes and efficiency of protection from fatal encephalitis.

作者信息

Mendoza Q P, Stanley J, Griffin D E

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.

出版信息

J Gen Virol. 1988 Dec;69 ( Pt 12):3015-22. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-69-12-3015.

Abstract

Protection of mice from fatal neuroadapted Sindbis virus encephalitis can be accomplished by passive transfer of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to either the E1 or E2 glycoprotein of Sindbis virus. Both neutralizing and non-neutralizing MAbs can be protective. To define further the characteristics of MAbs that provide protection from fatal disease, antigenic epitopes on the E1 and E2 glycoproteins were identified using a competitive binding enzyme immunoassay. Four distinct epitopes on E1 and three on E2 were defined. MAbs to all E1 epitopes, both neutralizing (three) and non-neutralizing (one) protected mice from fatal encephalitis. MAbs to the E2 neutralizing epitopes (two) protected mice from fatal encephalitis while those to the non-neutralizing epitope did not. The efficiency of protection from fatal Sindbis virus encephalitis of four neutralizing and non-neutralizing protective anti-E1 and anti-E2 MAbs representing different epitopes was compared. The neutralizing MAbs (against epitopes E2-ab, E2-c and E1-c) gave 50% protection at lower doses (2 to 20 micrograms) than the non-neutralizing MAb representing epitope E1-e (150 micrograms) when given before virus challenge. When given after virus challenge, MAbs to E2-ab and E2-c protected at lower doses (0.03 to 0.3 micrograms) than did either MAbs to E1-c (greater than 100 micrograms) or E1-e (10 micrograms). The MAbs to E1-e, E2-ab and E2-c were required in larger amounts to afford protection before than after challenge, while the opposite was true for MAb to E1-c.

摘要

通过将针对辛德毕斯病毒E1或E2糖蛋白的单克隆抗体(MAb)被动转移给小鼠,可使其免受致死性神经适应型辛德毕斯病毒脑炎的侵害。中和性和非中和性单克隆抗体均可起到保护作用。为了进一步明确能够预防致死性疾病的单克隆抗体的特性,使用竞争性结合酶免疫测定法鉴定了E1和E2糖蛋白上的抗原表位。确定了E1上有四个不同的表位,E2上有三个。针对所有E1表位的单克隆抗体,无论是中和性的(三种)还是非中和性的(一种),都能保护小鼠免受致死性脑炎的侵害。针对E2中和表位的单克隆抗体(两种)可保护小鼠免受致死性脑炎的侵害,而针对非中和表位的单克隆抗体则不能。比较了代表不同表位的四种中和性和非中和性保护性抗E1和抗E2单克隆抗体预防致死性辛德毕斯病毒脑炎的效率。在病毒攻击前给予时,中和性单克隆抗体(针对表位E2-ab、E2-c和E1-c)在较低剂量(2至20微克)时就能提供50%的保护,而代表表位E1-e的非中和性单克隆抗体则需要150微克。在病毒攻击后给予时,针对E2-ab和E2-c的单克隆抗体在较低剂量(0.03至0.3微克)时就能提供保护,而针对E1-c(大于100微克)或E1-e(10微克)的单克隆抗体则不然。与攻击后相比,在攻击前需要更多的E1-e、E2-ab和E2-c单克隆抗体才能提供保护,而针对E1-c的单克隆抗体情况则相反。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验