Memarpour Mahtab, Shafiei Fereshteh
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2014;12(2):149-55. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a31222.
To evaluate microleakage from an antibacterial adhesive and bonding agent added to the ssure sealant on intact enamel.
One hundred twenty sound third mandibular molars were randomly divided into 6 groups of 20 teeth each. Occlusal pits and ssures were sealed with un lled sealant material (Clinpro, 3M) after pretreatment with 1. phosphoric acid etching (control); 2. acid etching + Adper Single Bond 2 (SB, 3M); 3. chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX, Ultradent) + acid etching; 4. CHX + acid etching + SB; 5. acid etching + Clear l Protect Bond (CPB, Kuraray) 6. CPB alone. After 6-month water storage and thermocycling, the specimens were placed in 0.5% fuschin, sectioned and evaluated under a digital microscope. The data were compared between groups with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests.
Differences between groups were statistically signi cant at P < 0.05. Acid etching alone and with SB showed the lowest microleakage, followed by acid etching + CPB. Chlorhexidine with and without bonding agent showed the greatest microleakage.
Conventional acid etching alone or with a one-bottle adhesive were the two most effective methods of reducing microleakage from ssures. Acid etching together with a self-etching adhesive showed better results than self-etching alone. Appling CHX increased microleakage in sealed teeth.
评估添加到完整釉质上的抗菌粘合剂和粘结剂在Sure密封剂中的微渗漏情况。
120颗健康的下颌第三磨牙随机分为6组,每组20颗牙。在进行以下预处理后,用未填充的密封剂材料(Clinpro,3M)封闭咬合面窝沟:1. 磷酸酸蚀(对照组);2. 酸蚀+Adper Single Bond 2(SB,3M);3. 葡萄糖酸洗必泰(CHX,Ultradent)+酸蚀;4. CHX+酸蚀+SB;5. 酸蚀+Clear Protect Bond(CPB,可乐丽);6. 仅使用CPB。经过6个月的水储存和热循环后,将标本置于0.5%品红中,切片并在数字显微镜下评估。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Mann-Whitney检验对各组数据进行比较。
各组之间的差异在P<0.05时具有统计学意义。单独酸蚀和酸蚀加SB显示出最低的微渗漏,其次是酸蚀+CPB。使用和未使用粘结剂的洗必泰显示出最大的微渗漏。
单独的传统酸蚀或与单瓶粘合剂一起使用是减少窝沟微渗漏的两种最有效方法。酸蚀与自酸蚀粘合剂一起使用比单独自酸蚀显示出更好的效果。应用CHX会增加密封牙齿的微渗漏。