aDepartment of Cardiology bDepartment of Internal Medicine, Naval Medical Center San Diego cDepartment of Cardiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2014 Mar;15(3):189-93. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e3283654c4b.
Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, and age is a well-established independent risk factor for stroke in these patients. Whereas high-risk patients clearly benefit from anticoagulation to prevent stroke, less is known about how to treat low-risk patients. Despite the recent guidelines and studies demonstrating no benefit and excess bleeding risk with aspirin, many low-risk patients still receive this medication. Our objective was to determine the stroke rate in young patients with atrial fibrillation, a group of previously unstudied and predominantly low-risk patients. We hypothesized that the event rate would be so low as to preclude benefit from antithrombotic medications. A retrospective chart review identified patients with atrial fibrillation between the age of 18 and 35. Exclusion criteria included no ECG documentation of atrial fibrillation, anticoagulation, except around the time of cardioversion, and surgical valve disease. The primary outcome was stroke during the period of observation. The final cohort included 99 patients, mean age 27.6 years, followed for a mean of 4.3 years. Mean CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores were 0.26 and 0.4, respectively. A total of 42.4% were taking aspirin for over 50% of the time. There was one event identified, a transient ischemic attack in a man not on aspirin with CHADS2 and CHADS2-VASc scores of 1, resulting in event rates of 0.234 per 100 patient-years overall or 0.392 among those not on aspirin. Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation under age 35 have an exceedingly low stroke risk. We assert that aspirin may be unnecessary for most patients in this population, especially those with a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 0.
心房颤动是最常见的心律失常,年龄是这些患者中风的一个明确的独立危险因素。虽然高危患者显然受益于抗凝治疗以预防中风,但对于低危患者的治疗方法了解较少。尽管最近的指南和研究表明阿司匹林没有益处,且出血风险增加,但许多低危患者仍在接受这种药物治疗。我们的目的是确定年轻心房颤动患者的中风发生率,这是一组以前未研究过的、主要为低危患者的人群。我们假设,事件发生率如此之低,以至于抗血栓药物治疗没有获益。回顾性图表审查确定了年龄在 18 至 35 岁之间的心房颤动患者。排除标准包括没有心电图记录的心房颤动、除了在电复律前后之外没有抗凝治疗、以及手术瓣膜疾病。主要结局是观察期间的中风。最终队列包括 99 名患者,平均年龄 27.6 岁,平均随访 4.3 年。平均 CHADS2 和 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分为 0.26 和 0.4,分别为。共有 42.4%的患者在超过 50%的时间内服用阿司匹林。共发现 1 例事件,为一名未服用阿司匹林的 CHADS2 和 CHADS2-VASc 评分为 1 的男性短暂性脑缺血发作,导致总的事件发生率为每 100 患者年 0.234 例,未服用阿司匹林的患者为 0.392 例。年龄在 35 岁以下的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中风风险极低。我们断言,阿司匹林对于该人群中的大多数患者可能是不必要的,尤其是 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分为 0 的患者。