Golive Anjani, May Heidi T, Bair Tami L, Jacobs Victoria, Crandall Brian G, Cutler Michael J, Day John D, Mallender Charles, Osborn Jeffrey S, Stevens Scott M, Weiss J Peter, Woller Scott C, Bunch T Jared
Intermountain Medical Center Heart Institute, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah.
Intermountain Medical Center Heart Institute, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah; Department of Internal Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jul 1;120(1):75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.03.256. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
Among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), the risk of stroke risk is a significant concern. CHADS and CHADS-VASc ≤2 scoring have been used to stratify patients into categories of risk. Without randomized, prospective data, the need and type of long-term antithrombotic medications for thromboembolism prevention in lower risk AF patients remains controversial. We sought to define the long-term impact of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy use in AF patients at low risk of stroke. A total of 56,764 patients diagnosed with AF and a CHADS score of 0 or 1, or CHADS-VASc score of 0, 1, or 2 were studied. Antithrombotic therapy was defined as aspirin, clopidogrel (antiplatelet therapy), or warfarin monotherapy (anticoagulation) initiated within 6 months of AF diagnosis. End points included all-cause mortality, cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack (TIA), and major bleed. The average age of the population was 67.0 ± 14.1 years and 56.6% were male. In total, 9,682 received aspirin, 1,802 received clopidogrel, 1,164 received warfarin, and 46,042 did not receive any antithrombotic therapy. Event rates differed between patients with a CHADS score of 0 and 1; 18.5% and 37.8% had died, 1.7% and 3.4% had a stroke, 2.2% and 3.2% had a TIA, and 14% and 12.5% had a major bleed, respectively (p <0.0001 for all). The rates of stroke, TIA, and major bleeding increased as antithrombotic therapy intensity increased from no therapy, to aspirin, to clopidogrel, and to warfarin (all p <0.0001). Similar outcomes were observed in low-risk CHADS-VASc scores (0 to 2). In low-risk AF patients with a CHADS score of 0 to 1 or CHADS-VASc score of 0 to 2, the use of aspirin, clopidogrel, and warfarin was not associated with lower stroke rates at 5 years compared with no therapy. However, the use of antithrombotic agents was associated with a significant risk of bleed.
在心房颤动(AF)患者中,中风风险是一个重大问题。CHADS和CHADS-VASc评分≤2已被用于将患者分层为不同风险类别。在缺乏随机、前瞻性数据的情况下,低风险AF患者预防血栓栓塞所需的长期抗血栓药物及其类型仍存在争议。我们试图确定抗凝和抗血小板治疗对中风低风险AF患者的长期影响。共研究了56764例诊断为AF且CHADS评分为0或1,或CHADS-VASc评分为0、1或2的患者。抗血栓治疗定义为在AF诊断后6个月内开始使用阿司匹林、氯吡格雷(抗血小板治疗)或华法林单药治疗(抗凝)。终点包括全因死亡率、脑血管意外、短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)和大出血。研究人群的平均年龄为67.0±14.1岁,男性占56.6%。共有9682例患者接受阿司匹林治疗,1802例接受氯吡格雷治疗,1164例接受华法林治疗,46042例未接受任何抗血栓治疗。CHADS评分为0和1的患者的事件发生率有所不同;分别有18.5%和37.8%的患者死亡,1.7%和3.4%的患者发生中风,2.2%和3.2%的患者发生TIA,14%和12.5%的患者发生大出血(所有p<0.0001)。随着抗血栓治疗强度从无治疗增加到阿司匹林、氯吡格雷和华法林,中风、TIA和大出血的发生率均增加(所有p<0.0001)。在低风险CHADS-VASc评分(0至2)的患者中也观察到了类似的结果。在CHADS评分为0至1或CHADS-VASc评分为0至2的低风险AF患者中,与未治疗相比,使用阿司匹林、氯吡格雷和华法林在5年内并未降低中风发生率。然而,使用抗血栓药物会带来显著的出血风险。