• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低风险潜在缺血性胸痛急诊科患者早期出院预测规则的制定与验证

Development and validation of a prediction rule for early discharge of low-risk emergency department patients with potential ischemic chest pain.

作者信息

Scheuermeyer Frank Xavier, Wong Hubert, Yu Eugenia, Boychuk Barb, Innes Grant, Grafstein Eric, Gin Kenneth, Christenson Jim

出版信息

CJEM. 2014 Mar;16(2):106-19. doi: 10.2310/8000.2013.130938.

DOI:10.2310/8000.2013.130938
PMID:24626115
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Current guidelines emphasize that emergency department (ED) patients at low risk for potential ischemic chest pain cannot be discharged without extensive investigations or hospitalization to minimize the risk of missing acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We sought to derive and validate a prediction rule that permitted 20 to 30% of ED patients without ACS safely to be discharged within 2 hours without further provocative cardiac testing.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study enrolled 1,669 chest pain patients in two blocks in 2000-2003 (development cohort) and 2006 (validation cohort). The primary outcome was 30-day ACS diagnosis. A recursive partitioning model incorporated reliable and predictive cardiac risk factors, pain characteristics, electrocardiographic findings, and cardiac biomarker results.

RESULTS

In the derivation cohort, 165 of 763 patients (21.6%) had a 30-day ACS diagnosis. The derived prediction rule was 100.0% sensitive and 18.6% specific. In the validation cohort, 119 of 906 patients (13.1%) had ACS, and the prediction rule was 99.2% sensitive (95% CI 95.4-100.0) and 23.4% specific (95% CI 20.6-26.5). Patients have a very low ACS risk if arrival and 2-hour troponin levels are normal, the initial electrocardiogram is nonischemic, there is no history of ACS or nitrate use, age is < 50 years, and defined pain characteristics are met. The validation of the rule was limited by the lack of consistency in data capture, incomplete follow-up, and lack of evaluation of the accuracy, comfort, and clinical sensibility of this clinical decision rule.

CONCLUSION

The Vancouver Chest Pain Rule may identify a cohort of ED chest pain patients who can be safely discharged within 2 hours without provocative cardiac testing. Further validation across other centres with consistent application and comprehensive and uniform follow-up of all eligible and enrolled patients, in addition to measuring and reporting the accuracy of and comfort level with applying the rule and the clinical sensibility, should be completed prior to adoption and implementation.

摘要

目的

当前指南强调,对于潜在缺血性胸痛低风险的急诊科(ED)患者,若不进行全面检查或住院治疗,就无法出院,以将漏诊急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的风险降至最低。我们试图推导并验证一种预测规则,该规则允许20%至30%无ACS的ED患者在2小时内安全出院,无需进一步的激发性心脏检查。

方法

这项前瞻性队列研究在2000 - 2003年分两个阶段纳入了1669例胸痛患者(推导队列),并在2006年纳入了验证队列。主要结局是30天内的ACS诊断。递归划分模型纳入了可靠且具有预测性的心脏危险因素、疼痛特征、心电图表现和心脏生物标志物结果。

结果

在推导队列中,763例患者中有165例(21.6%)在30天内被诊断为ACS。推导的预测规则敏感性为100.0%,特异性为18.6%。在验证队列中,906例患者中有119例(13.1%)患有ACS,预测规则敏感性为99.2%(95%CI 95.4 - 100.0),特异性为23.4%(95%CI 20.6 - 26.5)。如果患者到达时和2小时后的肌钙蛋白水平正常、初始心电图无缺血表现、无ACS或使用硝酸盐的病史、年龄<50岁且符合特定的疼痛特征,则其ACS风险非常低。该规则的验证受到数据采集不一致、随访不完整以及未评估该临床决策规则的准确性、舒适度和临床敏感性的限制。

结论

温哥华胸痛规则可能识别出一组ED胸痛患者,他们可以在2小时内安全出院,无需进行激发性心脏检查。在采用和实施之前,应在其他中心进行进一步验证,包括一致的应用、对所有符合条件并登记的患者进行全面统一的随访,同时测量和报告应用该规则的准确性、舒适度水平以及临床敏感性。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a prediction rule for early discharge of low-risk emergency department patients with potential ischemic chest pain.低风险潜在缺血性胸痛急诊科患者早期出院预测规则的制定与验证
CJEM. 2014 Mar;16(2):106-19. doi: 10.2310/8000.2013.130938.
2
A clinical prediction rule for early discharge of patients with chest pain.胸痛患者早期出院的临床预测规则。
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Jan;47(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.08.007. Epub 2005 Oct 19.
3
Validation of the Vancouver Chest Pain Rule: a prospective cohort study.温哥华胸痛规则的验证:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Jul;19(7):837-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01399.x.
4
Validation of the Vancouver Chest Pain Rule using troponin as the only biomarker: a prospective cohort study.采用肌钙蛋白作为唯一生物标志物验证温哥华胸痛规则:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Jul;31(7):1103-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.04.016. Epub 2013 May 20.
5
Development of a clinical prediction rule for 30-day cardiac events in emergency department patients with chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome.胸痛和可能的急性冠脉综合征急诊科患者 30 天心脏事件的临床预测规则的制定。
Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Feb;59(2):115-25.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.07.026. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
6
The new Vancouver Chest Pain Rule using troponin as the only biomarker: an external validation study.采用肌钙蛋白作为唯一生物标志物的新版温哥华胸痛规则:一项外部验证研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Feb;32(2):129-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.10.021. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
7
Enhanced triage for patients with suspected cardiac chest pain: the History and Electrocardiogram-only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes decision aid.增强疑似心前区疼痛患者的分诊:仅病史和心电图的曼彻斯特急性冠状动脉综合征决策辅助工具。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2019 Oct;26(5):356-361. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000575.
8
Validation of the new Vancouver Chest Pain Rule in Asian chest pain patients presenting at the emergency department.新温哥华胸痛规则在急诊科就诊的亚洲胸痛患者中的验证。
CJEM. 2017 Jan;19(1):18-25. doi: 10.1017/cem.2016.336. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
9
Failure of prospective validation and derivation of a refined clinical decision rule for chest radiography in emergency department patients with chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome.前瞻性验证失败及改良临床决策规则在急诊科胸痛且可能患有急性冠脉综合征患者中应用于胸部 X 线摄影的推导。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Sep;19(9):E1004-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01428.x.
10
Novel Emergency Department Risk Score Discriminates Acute Coronary Syndrome Among Chest Pain Patients With Known Coronary Artery Disease.新型急诊科风险评分可鉴别已知冠状动脉疾病的胸痛患者中的急性冠状动脉综合征。
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2016 Dec;15(4):138-144. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000091.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a Novel Risk-Prediction Tool for Emergency Department Patients with Symptoms of Coronary Artery Disease: A Research Study Protocol.用于有冠状动脉疾病症状的急诊科患者的新型风险预测工具的开发:一项研究方案
CJC Open. 2025 Mar 26;7(6):777-783. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2025.03.016. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Safety and efficiency of implementation of high-sensitivity troponin T in the assessment of emergency department patients with cardiac chest pain.高敏肌钙蛋白 T 在急诊科胸痛患者评估中的应用的安全性和效率。
CJEM. 2024 Nov;26(11):814-818. doi: 10.1007/s43678-024-00778-1. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
3
Self-Administration of Aspirin After Chest Pain for the Prevention of Premature Cardiovascular Mortality in the United States: A Population-Based Analysis.
胸痛后自行服用阿司匹林预防美国过早心血管死亡率:基于人群的分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jun 4;13(11):e032778. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032778. Epub 2024 May 1.
4
Chest Pain Risk Stratification in the Emergency Department: Current Perspectives.急诊科胸痛风险分层:当前观点
Open Access Emerg Med. 2024 Feb 4;16:29-43. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S419657. eCollection 2024.
5
Prediction of adverse cardiac outcomes in high-risk Mexican patients with chest pain in the emergency department.预测急诊胸痛高危墨西哥患者的不良心脏结局。
Arch Cardiol Mex. 2023;93(2):183-188. doi: 10.24875/ACM.22000041.
6
Age differences in the safety and effectiveness of the HEART Pathway accelerated diagnostic protocol for acute chest pain.年龄对 HEART 路径加速诊断方案用于急性胸痛的安全性和有效性的影响。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Aug;70(8):2246-2257. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17777. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
7
Scoring systems for the triage and assessment of short-term cardiovascular risk in patients with acute chest pain.用于急性胸痛患者短期心血管风险分诊和评估的评分系统。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Dec 22;22(4):1393-1403. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2204144.
8
Effective combination of isolated symptom variables to help stratifying acute undifferentiated chest pain in the emergency department.有效组合孤立的症状变量以帮助在急诊科对急性未分化胸痛进行分层。
Clin Cardiol. 2019 Apr;42(4):467-475. doi: 10.1002/clc.23170. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
9
Comparison of nine coronary risk scores in evaluating patients presenting to hospital with undifferentiated chest pain.九种冠心病风险评分在评估因不明原因胸痛入院患者中的比较。
Int J Gen Med. 2018 Dec 13;11:473-481. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S183583. eCollection 2018.
10
The HEART score in predicting major adverse cardiac events in patients presenting to the emergency department with possible acute coronary syndrome: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.HEART 评分在预测急诊科疑似急性冠脉综合征患者中主要不良心脏事件的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 2;7(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0816-4.