Sachs M I, O'Connell E J
Mayo Medical School, Rochester, Minnesota.
Ann Allergy. 1988 Dec;61(6 Pt 2):36-40.
We have been most fortunate to witness advances in techniques related to the field of allergy. The development and implementation of RAST, RAST inhibition, crossed immunoelectrophoresis, and CRIE have allowed us to determine what food moieties have the potential to be allergenic. Furthermore, using the above techniques, it has become possible to delineate whether allergenic moieties in particular food stuffs share their allergenic determinants with other food materials. Despite these advances, it is difficult to make definite statements concerning clinically significant cross-reactivity among nuts, legumes, and crustacea. There is still, obviously, a role for the use of open and double-blind food challenges, as demonstrated by the peanut oil, soybean oil, and sunflower oil studies. Although food challenges, in situations where anaphylaxis is a possibility, should only be done under controlled circumstances and under the guidance of a well-defined protocol, this technique should remain available to further study cross-reactivity among foods. At the present time, the following conclusions concerning cross-reactivity among foods may be entertained. (1) Cross-reactivity among foods from different food groups is extremely rare. (2) Individuals having IgE-mediated reactions to legume proteins, for example peanut and soybean, do not respond to the corresponding oil derived from those substances. (3) Cross-reactivity among legumes may occur, but in vitro studies defining common allergenic determinants among these food substances cannot be automatically interpreted as reflecting in vivo cross-reactivity. Furthermore, very limited attempts at open and double-blind challenges in specific patients have not confirmed cross-reactivity in peanut-sensitive individuals to other legumes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
我们非常幸运地见证了过敏领域相关技术的进步。放射变应原吸附试验(RAST)、RAST抑制试验、交叉免疫电泳和交叉放射免疫电泳(CRIE)的发展与应用,使我们能够确定哪些食物成分可能具有致敏性。此外,运用上述技术,已能够阐明特定食物中的致敏成分是否与其他食物材料共享其致敏决定簇。尽管有这些进展,但对于坚果、豆类和甲壳类动物之间临床上显著的交叉反应性,仍难以做出明确的论断。显然,开放和双盲食物激发试验仍有作用,如花生油、大豆油和葵花籽油研究所示。尽管在可能发生过敏反应的情况下,食物激发试验仅应在可控环境下并按照明确的方案进行,但该技术仍应可用于进一步研究食物之间的交叉反应性。目前,关于食物间交叉反应性可得出以下结论:(1)不同食物组之间的交叉反应性极为罕见。(2)例如对花生和大豆等豆类蛋白有IgE介导反应的个体,对源自这些物质的相应油类无反应。(3)豆类之间可能发生交叉反应,但确定这些食物物质中常见致敏决定簇的体外研究不能自动解释为反映体内交叉反应性。此外,针对特定患者进行的开放和双盲激发试验的尝试非常有限,尚未证实对花生敏感的个体与其他豆类之间存在交叉反应性。(摘要截选至250词)