Rodriguez J, Crespo J F, Burks W, Rivas-Plata C, Fernandez-Anaya S, Vives R, Daroca P
Servicio de Alergia, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000 Nov;106(5):968-72. doi: 10.1067/mai.2000.110467.
Few studies have evaluated IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to melon with details of clinical reactions confirmed by double-blind, placebo-controlled, food challenges (DBPCFCs).
We sought to investigate clinical features (type and severity of reactions, age at onset, results of skin prick and in vitro tests, and incidence of other allergic diseases and associated food allergies) of acute allergic reactions to melon confirmed by DBPCFCs.
Fifty-three consecutive adult patients complaining of adverse reactions to melon were included in the study. Skin prick tests and detection of specific IgE were performed in all patients with melon, avocado, kiwi, banana, chestnut, latex, pollen, and other offending foods. Patients first underwent an open food challenge, unless they had a convincing history of severe anaphylaxis. Positive open food challenge reactions were subsequently evaluated by DBPCFCs.
Actual clinical reactivity was confirmed in 19 (36%) of 53 patients. The most frequent symptom was oral allergy syndrome (n = 14), but two patients experienced life-threatening reactions, including respiratory symptoms and hypotension. The positive predictive value for a skin prick test was 42%, and that for specific IgE measurement was 44%. Forty-five reactions to 15 other foods were confirmed in 18 patients. The most common foods associated with melon allergy were avocado (n = 7), banana (n = 7), kiwi (n = 6), watermelon (n = 6), and peach (n = 5). Onset of melon-induced allergic symptoms occurred from 6 to 45 years (median, 20 years), preceded by seasonal rhinitis, asthma, or both in 88% (15/17).
About one third of reported reactions to melon are confirmed by means of DBPCFC, which has been proven to be the most reliable procedure in the diagnosis of clinical fruit allergy. Isolated melon allergy is rare, with most patients either having allergic rhinitis, asthma, or both and associated food allergies.
很少有研究在通过双盲、安慰剂对照食物激发试验(DBPCFC)确认临床反应细节的情况下,评估对甜瓜的IgE介导的超敏反应。
我们试图调查经DBPCFC确认的对甜瓜急性过敏反应的临床特征(反应类型和严重程度、发病年龄、皮肤点刺试验和体外试验结果,以及其他过敏性疾病和相关食物过敏的发生率)。
本研究纳入了53例连续的主诉对甜瓜有不良反应的成年患者。对所有患者进行了甜瓜、鳄梨、猕猴桃、香蕉、栗子、乳胶、花粉和其他致敏食物的皮肤点刺试验和特异性IgE检测。患者首先接受开放性食物激发试验,除非他们有令人信服的严重过敏反应病史。开放性食物激发试验阳性反应随后通过DBPCFC进行评估。
53例患者中有19例(36%)被证实有实际临床反应性。最常见的症状是口腔过敏综合征(n = 14),但有2例患者出现危及生命的反应,包括呼吸道症状和低血压。皮肤点刺试验的阳性预测值为42%,特异性IgE检测的阳性预测值为44%。18例患者中确认了对15种其他食物的45次反应。与甜瓜过敏相关最常见的食物是鳄梨(n = 7)、香蕉(n = 7)、猕猴桃(n = 6)、西瓜(n = 6)和桃子(n = 5)。甜瓜诱发的过敏症状发病年龄为6至45岁(中位数为20岁),88%(15/17)的患者在发病前有季节性鼻炎、哮喘或两者皆有。
约三分之一报告的对甜瓜的反应通过DBPCFC得到证实,DBPCFC已被证明是诊断临床水果过敏最可靠的方法。孤立的甜瓜过敏很少见,大多数患者患有过敏性鼻炎、哮喘或两者皆有以及相关食物过敏。