Suppr超能文献

体位性收缩期高血压社区人群中站立时脉压反应过度。

Excessive pulse pressure response to standing in community population with orthostatic systolic hypertension.

作者信息

Xu Jingsong, Zhou Yueying, Cao Kaiwu, Li Juxiang, Tao Xuehua, Zhang Zhihong, Liu Xin, Liu Jiaqi, Su Hai

机构信息

Research Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases and Department of Cardiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, People's Republic of China.

Department of Medicine, Guizhou Hospital of Fushan city, Fushan, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014 Mar;8(3):166-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2013.12.002. Epub 2013 Dec 20.

Abstract

The postural change of pulse pressure (PP) in the persons with orthostatic hypertension (OHT) is unclear. This study included 2849 (65.0 ± 9.3 years) community participants. Blood pressures (BPs) in supine and standing positions were measured. The differences between upright and supine BP and PP were recorded as ΔBP and ΔPP. The criteria for OHT was ΔBP ≥10 mm Hg, for orthostatic hypotension (OH) was ≤-10 mm Hg and for orthostatic normotension (ONT) was -9 to 9 mm Hg. Fasting blood lipids and glucose were measured. The supine SBP of the sOHT group were similar to that of sONT group (140.9 ± 20.2 mm Hg vs 138.2 ± 19.7 mm Hg), but significantly lower than that of sOH group (151.9 ± 19.2 mm Hg; P < .05). Their PPs were 65.3 ± 15.9, 62.8 ± 14.7, and 71.1 ± 15.1 mm Hg, respectively, and with the similar group difference like SBP. When the position changed from supine to standing, the sOHT group showed PP rise, while sOH and sONT groups showed PP reduction (3.8 ± 7.1 mm Hg vs -17.0 ± 8.5 mm Hg and -5.8 ± 6.6 mm Hg; both P < .05). Thus, the standing PP in the sOHT group was significantly higher than in the sONT (69.1 ± 18.0 mm Hg vs 57.0 ± 15.8 mm Hg; P < .05) and in the sOH (54.2 ± 15.2 mm Hg; P < .05) groups. The postural PP profile varies with the postural responses of SBP. The sOHT group has obviously increased PP and significantly higher standing PP compared with the sONT group.

摘要

体位性高血压(OHT)患者脉压(PP)的体位变化尚不清楚。本研究纳入了2849名社区参与者(年龄65.0±9.3岁)。测量了仰卧位和站立位的血压(BP)。直立位与仰卧位血压及脉压的差值分别记录为ΔBP和ΔPP。OHT的标准为ΔBP≥10mmHg,体位性低血压(OH)的标准为≤-10mmHg,体位性血压正常(ONT)的标准为-9至9mmHg。检测了空腹血脂和血糖。体位性高血压组的仰卧位收缩压(SBP)与体位性血压正常组相似(140.9±20.2mmHg对138.2±19.7mmHg),但显著低于体位性低血压组(151.9±19.2mmHg;P<0.05)。其脉压分别为65.3±15.9、62.8±14.7和71.1±,15.1mmHg,且组间差异与收缩压相似。当体位从仰卧位变为站立位时,体位性高血压组脉压升高,而体位性低血压组和体位性血压正常组脉压降低(3.8±7.1mmHg对-17.0±8.5mmHg和-5.8±6.6mmHg;P均<0.05)。因此,体位性高血压组的站立位脉压显著高于体位性血压正常组(69.1±18.0mmHg对57.0±15.8mmHg;P<0.05)和体位性低血压组(54.2±15.2mmHg;P<0.05)。脉压的体位变化模式随收缩压的体位反应而变化。与体位性血压正常组相比,体位性高血压组脉压明显升高且站立位脉压显著更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验