• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

因阿片类药物过量而到急诊科就诊的流行病学:一项基于人群的研究。

Epidemiology of emergency department visits for opioid overdose: a population-based study.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 Apr;89(4):462-71. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.12.008. Epub 2014 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.12.008
PMID:24629443
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the rate of emergency department (ED) visits for opioid overdose and to examine whether frequent ED visits for opioid overdose are associated with more hospitalizations, near-fatal events, and health care spending.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of adults with at least 1 ED visit for opioid overdose between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2011, derived from population-based data of State Emergency Department Databases and State Inpatient Databases for 2 large and diverse states: California and Florida. Main outcome measures were hospitalizations for opioid overdose, near-fatal events (overdose involving mechanical ventilation), and hospital charges during the year after the first ED visit.

RESULTS

The analytic cohort comprised 19,831 unique patients with 21,609 ED visits for opioid overdose. During a 1-year period, 7% (95% CI, 7%-7%; n=1389 patients) of the patients had frequent (2 or more) ED visits, accounting for 15% (95% CI, 14%-15%; n=3167) of all opioid overdose ED visits. Middle age, male sex, public insurance, lower household income, and comorbidities (such as chronic pulmonary disease and neurological diseases) were associated with frequent ED visits (all P<.01). Overall, 53% (95% CI, 52%-54%; n=11,412) of the ED visits for opioid overdose resulted in hospitalizations; patients with frequent ED visits for opioid overdose had a higher likelihood of hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio, 3.98; 95% CI, 3.38-4.69). In addition, 10.0% (95% CI, 10%-10%; n=2161) of the ED visits led to near-fatal events; patients with frequent ED visits had a higher likelihood of a near-fatal event (adjusted odds ratio, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.96-2.66). Total charges in Florida were $208 million (95% CI, $200-$219 million).

CONCLUSION

In this population-based cohort, we found that frequent ED visits for opioid overdose were associated with a higher likelihood of future hospitalizations and near-fatal events.

摘要

目的

评估因阿片类药物过量到急诊科(ED)就诊的比率,并考察是否频繁因阿片类药物过量到 ED 就诊与更多的住院、濒死事件和医疗保健支出相关。

患者和方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2011 年 12 月 31 日期间至少有 1 次因阿片类药物过量到 ED 就诊的成年人,数据来自于加利福尼亚州和佛罗里达州两个大型且多样化的州的人群基础数据的州 ED 数据库和州住院患者数据库。主要结局指标为阿片类药物过量住院、濒死事件(涉及机械通气的药物过量)以及首次 ED 就诊后 1 年内的住院费用。

结果

分析队列包括 19831 例独特的患者,共有 21609 次因阿片类药物过量到 ED 就诊。在 1 年期间,7%(95%CI,7%-7%;1389 例患者)的患者有频繁(2 次或更多次)ED 就诊,占所有阿片类药物过量 ED 就诊的 15%(95%CI,14%-15%;3167 例患者)。中年、男性、公共保险、较低的家庭收入以及合并症(如慢性肺部疾病和神经系统疾病)与频繁 ED 就诊相关(均 P<.01)。总体而言,53%(95%CI,52%-54%;11412 例患者)的因阿片类药物过量到 ED 就诊导致住院治疗;频繁因阿片类药物过量到 ED 就诊的患者更有可能住院治疗(校正优势比,3.98;95%CI,3.38-4.69)。此外,10.0%(95%CI,10%-10%;2161 例患者)的因阿片类药物过量到 ED 就诊导致濒死事件;频繁因阿片类药物过量到 ED 就诊的患者更有可能发生濒死事件(校正优势比,2.27;95%CI,1.96-2.66)。佛罗里达州的总费用为 2.08 亿美元(95%CI,2.00-2.19 亿美元)。

结论

在这项基于人群的队列研究中,我们发现频繁因阿片类药物过量到 ED 就诊与未来住院和濒死事件的发生可能性更高相关。

相似文献

1
Epidemiology of emergency department visits for opioid overdose: a population-based study.因阿片类药物过量而到急诊科就诊的流行病学:一项基于人群的研究。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 Apr;89(4):462-71. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.12.008. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
2
Trends in U.S. emergency department visits for opioid overdose, 1993-2010.1993 - 2010年美国急诊科因阿片类药物过量就诊的趋势。
Pain Med. 2014 Oct;15(10):1765-70. doi: 10.1111/pme.12461. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
3
Frequent utilization of the emergency department for acute heart failure syndrome: a population-based study.急性心力衰竭综合征患者频繁使用急诊科:一项基于人群的研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 Sep;7(5):735-42. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.000949. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
4
Performance Measures of Diagnostic Codes for Detecting Opioid Overdose in the Emergency Department.急诊科用于检测阿片类药物过量的诊断代码的性能指标
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;24(4):475-483. doi: 10.1111/acem.13121. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
5
Frequent utilization of the emergency department for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.经常利用急诊部门治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的急性加重。
Respir Res. 2014 Apr 10;15(1):40. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-15-40.
6
Emergency Visits for Prescription Opioid Poisonings.处方阿片类药物中毒的急诊就诊情况
J Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;49(6):871-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.06.035. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
7
Development and characteristics of the Provincial Overdose Cohort in British Columbia, Canada.加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省省级过量用药队列的发展和特征。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 10;14(1):e0210129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210129. eCollection 2019.
8
Characterization of acetaminophen overdose-related emergency department visits and hospitalizations in the United States.美国对乙酰氨基酚过量相关急诊就诊和住院情况的特征描述。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Aug;20(8):819-26. doi: 10.1002/pds.2090. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
9
Adverse drug event-related emergency department visits associated with complex chronic conditions.与复杂慢性病相关的药物不良事件相关的急诊科就诊。
Pediatrics. 2014 Jun;133(6):e1575-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3060. Epub 2014 May 19.
10
Differences in healthcare utilization and associated costs between patients prescribed vs. nonprescribed opioids during an inpatient or emergency department visit.在住院或急诊就诊期间,开具阿片类药物处方的患者与未开具处方的患者在医疗保健利用及相关费用方面的差异。
Pain Pract. 2014 Jun;14(5):446-56. doi: 10.1111/papr.12098. Epub 2013 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of clinical decision support on controlled substance prescribing.临床决策支持对管制药品处方的影响。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Oct 20;23(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02314-0.
2
County-level social vulnerability and nonfatal drug overdose emergency department visits and hospitalizations, January 2018-December 2020.县级社会脆弱性与非致命性药物过量急诊就诊和住院治疗,2018 年 1 月-2020 年 12 月。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023 Jun 1;247:109889. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.109889. Epub 2023 Apr 23.
3
Risk Factors for Emergency Department Presentations after the Initiation of Opioid Analgesics in Non-Cancer Patients in Korea: A Nationwide Study.
韩国非癌症患者开始使用阿片类镇痛药后急诊就诊的风险因素:一项全国性研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 7;59(3):519. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030519.
4
Buprenorphine After Nonfatal Opioid Overdose: Reduced Mortality Risk in Medicare Disability Beneficiaries.美沙酮治疗非致死性阿片类药物过量:医疗保险残疾受益人死亡率降低。
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Jul;65(1):19-29. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.01.037. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
5
A Qualitative Investigation into the Trauma Exhibited by First Responders Impacted by the Opioid Epidemic.对受阿片类药物流行影响的急救人员所表现出的创伤进行的定性调查。
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2023 Jan 3:1-22. doi: 10.1007/s11469-022-00993-w.
6
Emergency Department Utilization Patterns in Patients with Opioid-Related Emergency Department Visits.阿片类药物相关急诊就诊患者的急诊科利用模式。
Subst Use Misuse. 2022;57(6):995-998. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2022.2046098. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
7
Development and validation of a risk-score model for opioid overdose using a national claims database.利用全国索赔数据库开发和验证阿片类药物过量风险评分模型。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 23;12(1):4974. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09095-y.
8
Are North Carolina clinicians delivering opioid use disorder treatment to Medicaid beneficiaries?北卡罗来纳州的临床医生是否为医疗补助受益人群提供阿片类药物使用障碍治疗?
Addiction. 2022 Nov;117(11):2855-2863. doi: 10.1111/add.15854. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
9
Mental disorder and opioid overdose: a systematic review.精神障碍与阿片类药物过量:系统评价。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022 Apr;57(4):647-671. doi: 10.1007/s00127-021-02199-2. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
10
Feasibility and acceptability of electronic administration of patient reported outcomes using mHealth platform in emergency department patients with non-medical opioid use.使用移动医疗平台在非医疗阿片类药物使用的急诊科患者中电子管理患者报告结局的可行性和可接受性。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2021 Nov 10;16(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13722-021-00276-0.