• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用全国索赔数据库开发和验证阿片类药物过量风险评分模型。

Development and validation of a risk-score model for opioid overdose using a national claims database.

机构信息

College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.

College of Pharmacy, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk, 38541, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 23;12(1):4974. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09095-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-09095-y
PMID:35322156
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8943129/
Abstract

Opioid overdose can be serious adverse effects of opioid analgesics. Thus, several strategies to mitigate risk and reduce the harm of opioid overdose have been developed. However, despite a marked increase in opioid analgesic consumption in Korea, there have been no tools predicting the risk of opioid overdose in the Korean population. Using the national claims database of the Korean population, we identified patients who were incidentally prescribed non-injectable opioid analgesic (NIOA) at least once from 2017 to 2018 (N = 1,752,380). Among them, 866 cases of opioid overdose occurred, and per case, four controls were selected. Patients were randomly allocated to the development (80%) and validation (20%) cohort. Thirteen predictive variables were selected via logistic regression modelling, and a risk-score was assigned for each predictor. Our model showed good performance with c-statistics of 0.84 in the validation cohort. The developed risk score model is the first tool to identify high-risk patients for opioid overdose in Korea. It is expected to be applicable in the clinical setting and useful as a national level surveillance tool due to the easily calculable and identifiable predictors available from the claims database.

摘要

阿片类药物过量是阿片类镇痛药的严重不良影响。因此,已经开发了几种减轻风险和减少阿片类药物过量危害的策略。然而,尽管韩国阿片类镇痛药的消耗量显著增加,但尚未有工具能够预测韩国人群中阿片类药物过量的风险。本研究使用韩国人口的全国索赔数据库,确定了 2017 年至 2018 年至少有一次偶然开出处方非注射用阿片类镇痛药(NIOA)的患者(N=1752380)。其中,866 例发生阿片类药物过量,每例选择 4 例对照。患者被随机分配到开发(80%)和验证(20%)队列。通过逻辑回归模型选择了 13 个预测变量,并为每个预测因子分配了风险评分。我们的模型在验证队列中具有 0.84 的 c 统计量,表现出良好的性能。该风险评分模型是第一个可用于识别韩国阿片类药物过量高危患者的工具。由于索赔数据库中提供了易于计算和识别的预测因子,预计该模型将在临床环境中具有适用性,并可作为国家层面的监测工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/137a/8943129/b5fabd1da5c1/41598_2022_9095_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/137a/8943129/c0c57c464710/41598_2022_9095_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/137a/8943129/69f72cc8442c/41598_2022_9095_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/137a/8943129/b5fabd1da5c1/41598_2022_9095_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/137a/8943129/c0c57c464710/41598_2022_9095_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/137a/8943129/69f72cc8442c/41598_2022_9095_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/137a/8943129/b5fabd1da5c1/41598_2022_9095_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a risk-score model for opioid overdose using a national claims database.利用全国索赔数据库开发和验证阿片类药物过量风险评分模型。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 23;12(1):4974. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09095-y.
2
Developing and validating a machine-learning algorithm to predict opioid overdose in Medicaid beneficiaries in two US states: a prognostic modelling study.开发和验证一种机器学习算法,以预测美国两个州医疗补助受益人的阿片类药物过量:预后建模研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Jun;4(6):e455-e465. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00062-0.
3
Evaluation of Machine-Learning Algorithms for Predicting Opioid Overdose Risk Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Opioid Prescriptions.评估机器学习算法在预测有阿片类药物处方的医疗保险受益人群中阿片类药物过量风险中的应用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190968. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0968.
4
Integrating human services and criminal justice data with claims data to predict risk of opioid overdose among Medicaid beneficiaries: A machine-learning approach.整合人类服务、刑事司法数据与理赔数据以预测医疗补助受益人中阿片类药物过量风险:一种机器学习方法。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 18;16(3):e0248360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248360. eCollection 2021.
5
Performance of a Predictive Model versus Prescription-Based Thresholds in Identifying Patients at Risk of Fatal Opioid Overdose.预测模型与基于处方阈值在识别致命阿片类药物过量风险患者中的表现比较。
Subst Use Misuse. 2021;56(3):396-403. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2020.1868520. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
6
Validation of a Screening Risk Index for Serious Prescription Opioid-Induced Respiratory Depression or Overdose in a US Commercial Health Plan Claims Database.在美国商业健康计划理赔数据库中验证用于严重处方类阿片类药物引起的呼吸抑制或药物过量的筛选风险指数。
Pain Med. 2018 Jan 1;19(1):68-78. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx009.
7
Development and validation of a predictive model for persistent opioid use in new opioid analgesic users via a nationwide claims database.基于全国性索赔数据库开发和验证新阿片类镇痛药使用者中持续性阿片类药物使用的预测模型。
Pain Pract. 2024 Mar;24(3):458-471. doi: 10.1111/papr.13320. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
8
Predicting overdose among individuals prescribed opioids using routinely collected healthcare utilization data.利用常规收集的医疗保健利用数据预测开处阿片类药物患者的药物过量情况。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 20;15(10):e0241083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241083. eCollection 2020.
9
Association between fatal opioid overdose and state medical cannabis laws in US national survey data, 2000-2011.美国国家调查数据显示,2000-2011 年期间,致命阿片类药物过量与州医疗大麻法律之间存在关联。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Jan;99:103449. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103449. Epub 2021 Sep 26.
10
Validation of an administrative claims coding algorithm for serious opioid overdose: A medical chart review.验证一种用于严重阿片类药物过量的行政索赔编码算法:病历回顾。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 Oct;28(10):1422-1428. doi: 10.1002/pds.4886. Epub 2019 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive Models for Identifying Adult Patients at High Risk of Developing Opioid-Related Harms: a Systematic Review.识别有阿片类药物相关伤害高风险成年患者的预测模型:一项系统综述
Drug Saf. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1007/s40264-025-01563-4.
2
Public Perception Towards Drug Abuse in South Korea: The Effects of Overconfidence and Affirmation.韩国公众对药物滥用的认知:过度自信与肯定的影响。
Psychiatry Investig. 2024 Jul;21(7):746-754. doi: 10.30773/pi.2023.0328. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
3
Assessment of Epidemiological Data and Surveillance in Korea Substance Use Research: Insights and Future Directions.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in opioid prescribing practices in South Korea, 2009-2019: Are we safe from an opioid epidemic?2009-2019 年韩国阿片类药物处方趋势:我们能免受阿片类药物流行的影响吗?
PLoS One. 2021 May 12;16(5):e0250972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250972. eCollection 2021.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of an Opioid Abuse-Prevention Program Using the Narcotics Information Management System in South Korea.利用韩国麻醉品信息管理系统预防阿片类药物滥用项目的成本效益分析。
Value Health. 2021 Feb;24(2):174-181. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.12.002. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
3
Association of Gabapentinoids With the Risk of Opioid-Related Adverse Events in Surgical Patients in the United States.
韩国物质使用研究中的流行病学数据评估与监测:见解与未来方向。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2024 Jul;57(4):307-318. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.24.171. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
4
A Machine Learning Application to Classify Patients at Differing Levels of Risk of Opioid Use Disorder: Clinician-Based Validation Study.一种用于对阿片类物质使用障碍不同风险水平患者进行分类的机器学习应用:基于临床医生的验证研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Jun 4;12:e53625. doi: 10.2196/53625.
5
Risk Factors for Emergency Department Presentations after the Initiation of Opioid Analgesics in Non-Cancer Patients in Korea: A Nationwide Study.韩国非癌症患者开始使用阿片类镇痛药后急诊就诊的风险因素:一项全国性研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 7;59(3):519. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030519.
美国接受手术的患者中加巴喷丁类药物与阿片类药物相关不良事件风险的相关性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2031647. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.31647.
4
Prediction of Opioid-Induced Respiratory Depression on Inpatient Wards Using Continuous Capnography and Oximetry: An International Prospective, Observational Trial.使用连续二氧化碳描记法和血氧定量法预测住院病房中阿片类药物引起的呼吸抑制:一项国际前瞻性观察性试验。
Anesth Analg. 2020 Oct;131(4):1012-1024. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004788.
5
A History of Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs in the United States: Political Appeal and Public Health Efficacy.美国处方药监测计划的历史:政治吸引力和公共卫生功效。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Aug;110(8):1191-1197. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305696. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
6
Key factors influencing the prescribing of statins: a qualitative study among physicians working in primary healthcare facilities in Indonesia.影响开具他汀类药物处方的关键因素:印度尼西亚初级保健机构医生中的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 15;10(6):e035098. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035098.
7
Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model.计算开发临床预测模型所需的样本量。
BMJ. 2020 Mar 18;368:m441. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m441.
8
Risk of Overdose with Exposure to Prescription Opioids, Benzodiazepines, and Non-benzodiazepine Sedative-Hypnotics in Adults: a Retrospective Cohort Study.成人接触处方类阿片、苯二氮䓬类药物和非苯二氮䓬类镇静催眠药导致药物过量的风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Mar;35(3):696-703. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05545-y. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
9
Risk Factors for Severe Opioid-Related Adverse Events in a National Cohort of Medical Hospitalizations.全国医疗住院队列中与阿片类药物相关的严重不良事件的风险因素。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Feb;35(2):538-545. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05490-w. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
10
Trends in chronic opioid use and association with five-year survival in South Korea: a population-based cohort study.韩国慢性阿片类药物使用趋势及其与五年生存率的关系:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Nov;123(5):655-663. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.08.012. Epub 2019 Sep 23.