• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗服务提供者在结直肠癌结肠镜筛查中的作用。

Providers role in colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer.

作者信息

Ramdass Prakash, Petraro Paul, Via Christina, Shahrokni Armin, Nawaz Haq

机构信息

Thornbury Medical Care, Assistant Professor, American University of Barbados, School of Medicine, St. Michael, Barbados.

Griffin Hospital, Department of Medical Education and Preventive Medicine, Derby, CT, USA.

出版信息

Am J Health Behav. 2014 Mar;38(2):234-44. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.38.2.9.

DOI:10.5993/AJHB.38.2.9
PMID:24629552
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine predictors of provider recommendations for colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

We examined proportions of patients without prior screening for colonoscopy and their willingness to get a colonoscopy if recommended by a healthcare provider.

RESULTS

The rate of CRC screening with a colonoscopy within the recommended guidelines was 35%; provider recommendation rate for colonoscopy screening was 34.9%; and never-screened patients would receive a colonoscopy 78% when recommended by a provider. Provider recommendation was the best predictor for receiving a screening colonoscopy (OR 4.19; 95% CI, 1.91-9.22, p < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Physician recommendation for colonoscopy is the most effective strategy to promote screening colonoscopy in the US, but only one third of eligible patients recall such counseling.

摘要

目的

研究结直肠癌(CRC)医疗服务提供者推荐的预测因素。

方法

我们调查了未进行过结肠镜筛查的患者比例,以及他们在医疗服务提供者建议下接受结肠镜检查的意愿。

结果

在推荐指南范围内进行结肠镜CRC筛查的比例为35%;结肠镜筛查的医疗服务提供者推荐率为34.9%;从未接受过筛查的患者在医疗服务提供者建议下接受结肠镜检查的比例为78%。医疗服务提供者的推荐是接受结肠镜筛查的最佳预测因素(比值比4.19;95%置信区间,1.91 - 9.22,p < 0.01)。

结论

在美国,医生对结肠镜检查的推荐是促进结肠镜筛查的最有效策略,但只有三分之一符合条件的患者记得此类咨询。

相似文献

1
Providers role in colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer.医疗服务提供者在结直肠癌结肠镜筛查中的作用。
Am J Health Behav. 2014 Mar;38(2):234-44. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.38.2.9.
2
The effect of primary care physician counseling on participation rate and use of sedation in colonoscopy-based colorectal cancer screening program--a randomized controlled study.初级保健医生咨询对基于结肠镜检查的结直肠癌筛查项目参与率和镇静使用的影响——一项随机对照研究。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul;49(7):878-84. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2014.913191. Epub 2014 May 5.
3
Community-based preferences for stool cards versus colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening.社区对结直肠癌筛查中粪便检测卡与结肠镜检查的偏好
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Feb;23(2):169-74. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0480-1. Epub 2007 Dec 21.
4
Physician counseling for colorectal cancer screening: impact on patient attitudes, beliefs, and behavior.医生对结直肠癌筛查的咨询:对患者态度、信念和行为的影响。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2011 Nov-Dec;24(6):673-81. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2011.06.110001.
5
Colonoscopy screening among US adults aged 40 or older with a family history of colorectal cancer.对40岁及以上有结直肠癌家族史的美国成年人进行结肠镜检查筛查。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 May 21;12:E80. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.140533.
6
Do benefits and barriers differ by stage of adoption for colorectal cancer screening?结直肠癌筛查的获益和障碍在采用阶段上是否存在差异?
Health Educ Res. 2005 Apr;20(2):137-48. doi: 10.1093/her/cyg110. Epub 2004 Aug 16.
7
Viewpoints of the target population regarding barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in the Czech Republic.目标人群对捷克共和国结直肠癌筛查障碍和促进因素的观点。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Mar 7;25(9):1132-1141. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i9.1132.
8
Colorectal cancer screening mode preferences among US veterans.美国退伍军人对结直肠癌筛查模式的偏好。
Prev Med. 2009 Nov;49(5):442-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.09.002. Epub 2009 Sep 8.
9
The interrelationships between and contributions of background, cognitive, and environmental factors to colorectal cancer screening adherence.背景、认知和环境因素之间的相互关系及其对结直肠癌筛查依从性的贡献。
Cancer Causes Control. 2010 Sep;21(9):1357-68. doi: 10.1007/s10552-010-9563-0. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
10
Predictors of compliance with free endoscopic colorectal cancer screening in uninsured adults.未参保成年人免费内镜结直肠癌筛查依从性的预测因素。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Aug;26(8):875-80. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1716-7. Epub 2011 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors affecting adherence to a high-risk surveillance protocol among patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome.影响李-弗劳梅尼综合征患者对高危监测方案依从性的因素。
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2023 Aug 11;21(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13053-023-00259-z.
2
Provider and patient perspectives to improve lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography 5 years after Medicare coverage: a qualitative study.医疗保险覆盖 5 年后,通过低剂量计算机断层扫描提高肺癌筛查效果的提供者和患者观点:一项定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Dec 20;23(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01925-2.
3
Social media and mobile health technology for cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
社交媒体和移动医疗技术在癌症筛查中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 5;10(2):e035411. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035411.
4
Understanding the decision to screen for lung cancer or not: A qualitative analysis.了解是否进行肺癌筛查的决策:一项定性分析。
Health Expect. 2019 Dec;22(6):1314-1321. doi: 10.1111/hex.12975. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
5
Understanding lung cancer screening behaviour using path analysis.运用路径分析理解肺癌筛查行为。
J Med Screen. 2020 Jun;27(2):105-112. doi: 10.1177/0969141319876961. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
6
The effect of the Affordable Care Act on patient out-of-pocket cost and use of preventive cancer screenings in Massachusetts.《平价医疗法案》对马萨诸塞州患者自付费用及预防性癌症筛查使用情况的影响。
Prev Med Rep. 2019 Jun 21;15:100924. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100924. eCollection 2019 Sep.
7
Patterns and Trends in Cancer Screening in the United States.美国癌症筛查的模式和趋势。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Jul 26;15:E97. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.170465.
8
Assessing the impact of colonoscopy complications on use of colonoscopy among primary care physicians and other connected physicians: an observational study of older Americans.评估结肠镜检查并发症对初级保健医生及其他相关医生使用结肠镜检查的影响:一项针对美国老年人的观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 23;7(6):e014239. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014239.
9
Lung Cancer Screening Participation: Developing a Conceptual Model to Guide Research.肺癌筛查参与度:构建一个指导研究的概念模型
Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2016 Nov 1;30(4):333-352. doi: 10.1891/1541-6577.30.4.333.
10
Neighborhood Satisfaction and Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Community Sample of African Americans.非裔美国人社区样本中的邻里满意度与结直肠癌筛查
J Community Health. 2016 Feb;41(1):38-45. doi: 10.1007/s10900-015-0062-9.