Boguradzka Anna, Wiszniewski Michal, Kaminski Michal F, Kraszewska Ewa, Mazurczak-Pluta Teresa, Rzewuska Dorota, Ptasinski Adam, Regula Jaroslaw
Medical Centre for Postgraduate Education , Warsaw , Poland.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul;49(7):878-84. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2014.913191. Epub 2014 May 5.
Physician recommendation is a strong predictor of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening adherence, but there are no sufficient data specific to primary colonoscopy screening programs. The primary objective was to compare the effect of primary care physician's (PCP) counseling with information leaflet about CRC screening on participation rate in opportunistic primary colonoscopy screening program. Secondary objective was to determine the impact of this counseling on a decision to choose unsedated colonoscopy.
Six hundred consecutive subjects 50-65 years of age visiting PCP group practice for routine medical consultation were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio either to discuss CRC screening with PCP or to receive an information leaflet on CRC screening only. The outcome measures were the participation rate and the proportion of unsedated colonoscopies assessed on subjects' self-reports collected six months after the intervention. Multivariate logistic regression model with backward selection was used to investigate the association between independent covariates and binary endpoints.
Participation rate was 47.0% (141 subjects) in the counseling group and 13.7% (41 patients) in the information leaflet group. The rates of unsedated colonoscopies were 77.0% and 39.0%, respectively. In a multivariate analyses, PCP's counseling was associated with higher participation in CRC screening (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 5.33, 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] 3.55-8.00) and higher rate of unsedated colonoscopies (OR 7.75, 95% CI 2.94-20.45).
In opportunistic primary colonoscopy screening, PCP's counseling significantly increases participation rate and decreases demand for sedation compared to recruitment with information materials only. NCT01688817.
医生建议是结直肠癌(CRC)筛查依从性的有力预测因素,但针对初级结肠镜筛查项目尚无足够的特定数据。主要目的是比较初级保健医生(PCP)咨询与CRC筛查信息传单对机会性初级结肠镜筛查项目参与率的影响。次要目的是确定这种咨询对选择非镇静结肠镜检查决策的影响。
连续600名年龄在50 - 65岁之间前往PCP团体诊所进行常规医疗咨询的受试者,以1:1的比例随机分配,要么与PCP讨论CRC筛查,要么仅接收一份关于CRC筛查的信息传单。结局指标是干预6个月后根据受试者自我报告评估的参与率和非镇静结肠镜检查的比例。采用向后选择的多变量逻辑回归模型来研究独立协变量与二元终点之间的关联。
咨询组的参与率为47.0%(141名受试者),信息传单组为13.7%(41名患者)。非镇静结肠镜检查的比例分别为77.0%和39.0%。在多变量分析中,PCP的咨询与更高的CRC筛查参与率相关(调整后的优势比[OR]为5.33,95%置信区间[95%CI]为3.55 - 8.00)以及更高的非镇静结肠镜检查率(OR为7.75,95%CI为2.94 - 20.45)。
在机会性初级结肠镜筛查中,与仅使用信息材料招募相比,PCP的咨询显著提高了参与率并降低了镇静需求。NCT01688817。