Williams Keith E, Hendy Helen M
Feeding Program, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA.
Psychology Program, Penn State University, Schuylkill Campus, Schuylkill Haven, PA.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014 Jul-Aug;46(4):236-240. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2014.01.003. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
To examine child and parent variables associated with complete oral calorie supplement use among children with feeding problems.
Correlational examination of data from patient intake surveys.
Hospital-based feeding program.
Participants included 281 parents of children referred to a hospital-based feeding clinic, including 114 who received supplements (70.2% boys; mean age, 60.1 months) and 167 who did not receive (79.6% boys; mean age, 67.5 months).
Children's age, gender, weight status, diagnostic category (no special needs, autism, or other special needs), supplement intake, oral motor problems, child mealtime behavior (using the Child Eating Behavior Questionnaire), parent feeding practices (using the Parent Mealtime Action Scale), and diet variety for child and parent.
Chi-square analyses compared children who did and did not receive supplements for their percentage of gender, diagnostic, and weight status categories; t tests or Mann-Whitney U tests compared children who did and did not receive supplements, for age, oral motor problems, children's mealtime behavior, parent feeding practices, and diet variety.
Compared with children who did not receive nutritional supplements, those who did were younger (P < .01) and more underweight (P < .001), and showed less Food Responsiveness (P < .001), less Food Enjoyment (P < .001), more Food Satiety (P < .001, and more Slow Eating (P < .001), and their parents were more likely to use Insistence on Eating (P < .001).
Whereas supplement use was related to underweight, 78.2% of children receiving them were normal weight or overweight, which suggests that supplements are being used to address mealtime selective eating. The use of supplements should be considered carefully because they do not appear to increase diet variety and may increase the chance of overweight over time.
研究与喂养问题儿童完全口服热量补充剂使用相关的儿童及家长变量。
对患者入院调查数据进行相关性分析。
医院喂养项目。
参与者包括281名转诊至医院喂养诊所儿童的家长,其中114名儿童接受了补充剂(男孩占70.2%;平均年龄60.1个月),167名未接受补充剂(男孩占79.6%;平均年龄67.5个月)。
儿童的年龄、性别、体重状况、诊断类别(无特殊需求、自闭症或其他特殊需求)、补充剂摄入量、口腔运动问题、儿童用餐行为(使用儿童饮食行为问卷)、家长喂养行为(使用家长用餐行为量表)以及儿童和家长的饮食多样性。
卡方分析比较接受和未接受补充剂儿童在性别、诊断和体重状况类别上的百分比;t检验或曼-惠特尼U检验比较接受和未接受补充剂儿童在年龄、口腔运动问题、儿童用餐行为、家长喂养行为和饮食多样性方面的差异。
与未接受营养补充剂的儿童相比,接受补充剂的儿童年龄更小(P < .01)、体重过轻的比例更高(P < .001),且食物反应性更低(P < .001)、食物享受度更低(P < .001)、食物饱腹感更强(P < .001)、进食速度更慢(P < .001),其家长更有可能采用强迫进食的方式(P < .001)。
虽然补充剂的使用与体重过轻有关,但接受补充剂的儿童中有78.2%体重正常或超重,这表明补充剂被用于解决用餐时的选择性进食问题。应谨慎考虑使用补充剂,因为它们似乎不会增加饮食多样性,且随着时间推移可能会增加超重的几率。