Suppr超能文献

接受辅助生殖技术的患者患妊娠期糖尿病的风险。

Risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in patients undergoing assisted reproductive techniques.

作者信息

Ashrafi M, Gosili R, Hosseini R, Arabipoor A, Ahmadi J, Chehrazi M

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology and Female Infertility at Reproductive Biomedicine Research Centre, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Endocrinology and Female Infertility at Reproductive Biomedicine Research Centre, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 May;176:149-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.02.009. Epub 2014 Feb 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) between pregnancies conceived spontaneously and pregnancies conceived following assisted reproductive technology (ART).

STUDY DESIGN

This cross-sectional study evaluated the medical records of 215 women who conceived spontaneously and 145 women who conceived following ART from September 2011 to October 2012. Exclusion criteria were: polycystic ovary syndrome, maternal age ≥40 years, family history of diabetes in first-degree relatives, pre-pregnancy diabetes, glucose intolerance treated with hypoglycaemic agent (e.g. metformin), history of GDM, history of stillbirth, recurrent miscarriage, history of baby with birth weight ≥4kg (macrosomia), parity >3, Cushing syndrome, congenital adrenal hyperplasia and hypothyroidism. For better comparison of the incidence of GDM, the ART group was further subdivided into: (i) an in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) group (n=95); and (ii) an intrauterine insemination (IUI) group (n=50). The diagnosis of GDM was based on the criteria of the American Diabetes Association.

RESULTS

The incidence of GDM was significantly higher in the IVF/ICSI and IUI groups (43% and 26%, respectively) compared with the spontaneous pregnancy group (10%). Age, pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and weight gain in pregnancy were similar among women with GDM in all three groups. In addition, the incidence of pregnancy-induced hypertension was significantly higher in the IVF/ICSI group (21%) compared with the spontaneous pregnancy group (7%). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated four strong risk factors for GDM: age, BMI, mode of ART and progesterone use during pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

This study indicated that the risk of GDM is two-fold higher in women with singleton pregnancies conceived following ART compared with women who conceived spontaneously. In addition, progesterone use during pregnancy was found to be an important risk factor for GDM. This subject requires further study.

摘要

目的

比较自然受孕与辅助生殖技术(ART)受孕后妊娠期间妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的发生率。

研究设计

这项横断面研究评估了2011年9月至2012年10月期间215例自然受孕妇女和145例ART受孕妇女的病历。排除标准为:多囊卵巢综合征、产妇年龄≥40岁、一级亲属糖尿病家族史、孕前糖尿病、用降糖药(如二甲双胍)治疗的糖耐量异常、GDM病史、死产史、复发性流产、出生体重≥4kg(巨大儿)的婴儿史、产次>3、库欣综合征、先天性肾上腺皮质增生症和甲状腺功能减退症。为了更好地比较GDM的发生率,ART组进一步细分为:(i)体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射(IVF/ICSI)组(n = 95);和(ii)宫腔内人工授精(IUI)组(n = 50)。GDM的诊断基于美国糖尿病协会的标准。

结果

与自然受孕组(10%)相比,IVF/ICSI组和IUI组GDM的发生率显著更高(分别为43%和26%)。三组GDM妇女的年龄、孕前体重指数(BMI)和孕期体重增加情况相似。此外,与自然受孕组(7%)相比,IVF/ICSI组妊娠高血压的发生率显著更高(21%)。逻辑回归分析显示GDM有四个强危险因素:年龄、BMI、ART方式和孕期使用孕激素。

结论

本研究表明,与自然受孕妇女相比,ART受孕的单胎妊娠妇女发生GDM的风险高出两倍。此外,发现孕期使用孕激素是GDM的一个重要危险因素。这个问题需要进一步研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验