Pergola Giulio, Bellebaum Christian, Suchan Boris
Department of Basic Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari - 'Aldo Moro', Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11, I-70100 Bari, Italy; Cognitive Neuroscience Sector, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), via Bonomea 265, I-34136 Trieste, Italy.
Department of Neuropsychology, Ruhr-University Bochum, D-44780 Bochum, Germany; Institute of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Universitaetsstrasse 1, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Behav Brain Res. 2014 Jun 1;266:63-76. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.02.050. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
Explicit associative memory relies on different neural substrates depending on similarity of the items associated. Extant literature dissociates old/new effects elicited by homogeneous and heterogeneous pairs. However, current results scarcely address potential priming effects induced by the presentation sequence. In the present ERP study, participants learned associations between two pictures, which either belonged to the same semantic category (e.g., animal-animal), or to different categories (e.g., animal-scene). Pictures forming a pair were shown sequentially, allowing for investigation of the different neural processes related to presentation of the first and the second item. After the study phase, participants performed a recognition judgment. After recognition, participants were asked to recall the associated picture. During retrieval, between 260 and 350 ms post-stimulus there was a significant frontal effect of category (i.e., same-category versus different-category), but only for items shown first within a pair. In the 350-600 ms time window the parietal old/new effect was unaffected by semantic category, but was modulated by presentation order. Exploratory analyses revealed even earlier effects in the time windows 40-90 ms and 150-200 ms. This evidence supports the priming account of the FN400 and highlights the importance of sequence effects in electrophysiological activity during episodic retrieval.
显性联想记忆依赖于不同的神经基质,这取决于相关项目的相似性。现有文献区分了由同类和异类对引发的新旧效应。然而,目前的研究结果几乎没有涉及呈现顺序所诱发的潜在启动效应。在本ERP研究中,参与者学习了两张图片之间的关联,这两张图片要么属于同一语义类别(例如,动物-动物),要么属于不同类别(例如,动物-场景)。构成一对的图片按顺序呈现,以便研究与第一张和第二张图片呈现相关的不同神经过程。在学习阶段之后,参与者进行识别判断。识别之后,要求参与者回忆相关图片。在检索过程中,刺激后260至350毫秒之间存在显著的类别额叶效应(即,同类与异类),但仅针对一对中首先呈现的项目。在350 - 600毫秒的时间窗口内,顶叶新旧效应不受语义类别的影响,但受呈现顺序的调节。探索性分析在40 - 90毫秒和150 - 200毫秒的时间窗口内发现了更早的效应。这一证据支持了FN400的启动解释,并突出了情节检索过程中电生理活动中顺序效应的重要性。