Suppr超能文献

固相萃取和液/液萃取在多类农药分析前对毛发提取物进行净化的比较。

Comparison of solid phase- and liquid/liquid-extraction for the purification of hair extract prior to multi-class pesticides analysis.

机构信息

Laboratory of Analytical Human Biomonitoring, CRP-Santé, 162A avenue de la Faïencerie, L-1511 Luxembourg, Luxembourg.

Laboratory of Analytical Human Biomonitoring, CRP-Santé, 162A avenue de la Faïencerie, L-1511 Luxembourg, Luxembourg.

出版信息

J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2014 Apr 1;955-956:98-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2014.02.035. Epub 2014 Feb 28.

Abstract

The present study focuses on the influence of a purification step - after extraction of pesticides from hair and before analysis of the extract - on the sensitivity of analytical methods including compounds from different chemical classes (both parent and metabolites). Sixty-seven pesticides and metabolites from different chemical classes were tested here: organochlorines, organophosphates, carbamates, pyrethroids, ureas, azoles, phenylpyrazoles and neonicotinoids. Two gas chromatography-negative chemical ionization-tandem mass spectrometry methods and one based on ultra-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry were used. Seven solid-phase extraction cartridges: C18, S-DVB, PS-DVB, GCB, GCB/PSA, SAX/PSA and Florisil/PSA were tested and compared to more classical liquid-liquid extraction procedures using ethyl acetate, hexane and dichloromethane. Although LLE allowed obtaining good results for some compounds, on the whole, SPE clearly provided better recovery for the majority of the pesticide residues tested in the present study. GCB/PSA was clearly the best suited to non-polar compounds such as organochlorines, pyrethroids and organophosphates, with recovery ranging from 45.9% (diflufenican) to 117.1% (parathion methyl). For hydrophilic metabolites (e.g. dialkyl phosphates and other organophosphate metabolites, pyrethroid metabolites, phenols and carbamate metabolites), the best results were obtained with PS-DVB, with recovery ranged from 10.3% (malathion monocarboxylic acid) to 93.1% (para-nitrophenol). For hydrophilic parent pesticides (e.g. neonicotinoids, carbamates, azoles) and metabolites without nucleophilic functions, the best recovery was obtained with SAX/PSA, with recovery ranging from 52.1% (3-hydroxycarbofuran) to 100.9% (3,4-dichloroaniline). Solid phase extraction was found to be more suitable than the liquid-liquid extraction for pesticides and their metabolites determination in terms of number of extracted compounds and their recovery. Moreover, the use of solid phase extraction cartridges has enabled the reduction of the analytical background noise, resulting in better chromatographic separations.

摘要

本研究重点关注净化步骤(在从头发中提取农药并分析提取物之前进行)对分析方法的灵敏度的影响,包括来自不同化学类别的化合物(母体和代谢物)。在这里测试了 67 种来自不同化学类别的农药及其代谢物:有机氯、有机磷、氨基甲酸酯、拟除虫菊酯、脲、唑类、苯并吡唑和新烟碱类。使用了两种气相色谱-负化学电离-串联质谱法和一种基于超高效液相色谱-电喷雾串联质谱法。测试并比较了七种固相萃取小柱:C18、S-DVB、PS-DVB、GCB、GCB/PSA、SAX/PSA 和 Florisil/PSA,与使用乙酸乙酯、正己烷和二氯甲烷的更经典的液液萃取程序进行比较。虽然 LLE 可以为某些化合物获得良好的结果,但总的来说,SPE 显然为大多数在本研究中测试的农药残留物提供了更好的回收率。GCB/PSA 显然最适合非极性化合物,如有机氯、拟除虫菊酯和有机磷,回收率范围为 45.9%(双氟芬酸)至 117.1%(甲基对硫磷)。对于亲水性代谢物(例如二烷基磷酸酯和其他有机磷代谢物、拟除虫菊酯代谢物、酚类和氨基甲酸酯代谢物),最好的结果是使用 PS-DVB 获得的,回收率范围为 10.3%(马拉硫磷单羧酸)至 93.1%(对硝基苯酚)。对于亲水性母体农药(例如新烟碱类、氨基甲酸酯类、唑类)和无亲核功能的代谢物,最好的回收率是使用 SAX/PSA 获得的,回收率范围为 52.1%(3-羟基糠醛)至 100.9%(3,4-二氯苯胺)。固相萃取在提取化合物数量和回收率方面被发现比液液萃取更适合于农药及其代谢物的测定。此外,固相萃取小柱的使用能够降低分析背景噪声,从而实现更好的色谱分离。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验