• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在澳大利亚公共卫生政策环境中影响决策和证据使用的外部因素。

External factors affecting decision-making and use of evidence in an Australian public health policy environment.

作者信息

Zardo Pauline, Collie Alex, Livingstone Charles

机构信息

Monash University, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Australia; Institute for Safety, Compensation and Recovery Research, Australia.

Monash University, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Australia; Institute for Safety, Compensation and Recovery Research, Australia.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2014 May;108:120-7. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.046. Epub 2014 Mar 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.046
PMID:24632115
Abstract

This study examined external factors affecting policy and program decision-making in a specific public health policy context: injury prevention and rehabilitation compensation in the Australian state of Victoria. The aim was twofold: identify external factors that affect policy and program decision-making in this specific context; use this evidence to inform targeting of interventions aimed at increasing research use in this context. Qualitative interviews were undertaken from June 2011 to January 2012 with 33 employees from two state government agencies. Key factors identified were stakeholder feedback and action, government and ministerial input, legal feedback and action, injured persons and the media. The identified external factors were able to significantly influence policy and program decision-making processes: acting as both barriers and facilitators, depending on the particular issue at hand. The factors with the most influence were the Minister and government, lawyers, and agency stakeholders, particularly health providers, trade unions and employer groups. This research revealed that interventions aimed at increasing use of research in this context must target and harness the influence of these groups. This research provides critical insights for researchers seeking to design interventions to increase use of research in policy environments and influence decision-making in Victorian injury prevention and rehabilitation compensation.

摘要

本研究考察了在特定公共卫生政策背景下影响政策和项目决策的外部因素

澳大利亚维多利亚州的伤害预防与康复补偿。目的有两个:确定在此特定背景下影响政策和项目决策的外部因素;利用这些证据为旨在增加此背景下研究成果应用的干预措施提供目标导向。2011年6月至2012年1月,对两个州政府机构的33名员工进行了定性访谈。确定的关键因素包括利益相关者的反馈与行动、政府和部长的投入、法律反馈与行动、伤者及媒体。所确定的外部因素能够显著影响政策和项目决策过程:根据手头的具体问题,既可能成为障碍,也可能起到促进作用。最具影响力的因素是部长和政府、律师以及机构利益相关者,特别是医疗服务提供者、工会和雇主团体。这项研究表明,旨在增加此背景下研究成果应用的干预措施必须针对并利用这些群体的影响力。这项研究为寻求设计干预措施以增加研究成果在政策环境中的应用并影响维多利亚州伤害预防与康复补偿决策的研究人员提供了重要见解。

相似文献

1
External factors affecting decision-making and use of evidence in an Australian public health policy environment.在澳大利亚公共卫生政策环境中影响决策和证据使用的外部因素。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 May;108:120-7. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.046. Epub 2014 Mar 1.
2
Measuring use of research evidence in public health policy: a policy content analysis.衡量公共卫生政策中研究证据的应用:一项政策内容分析。
BMC Public Health. 2014 May 23;14:496. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-496.
3
Predicting research use in a public health policy environment: results of a logistic regression analysis.预测公共卫生政策环境中的研究应用:逻辑回归分析结果
Implement Sci. 2014 Oct 9;9:142. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0142-8.
4
Type, frequency and purpose of information used to inform public health policy and program decision-making.用于为公共卫生政策和项目决策提供信息的信息类型、频率及目的。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 15;15:381. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1581-0.
5
Policy change to create supportive environments for physical activity and healthy eating: which options are the most realistic for local government?政策改变以创造支持身体活动和健康饮食的环境:地方政府最现实的选择有哪些?
Health Promot Int. 2012 Jun;27(2):261-74. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dar018. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
6
Interview with the Hon. Nicola Roxon: getting evidence into health policy.对尊敬的尼古拉·罗克森的采访:将证据纳入卫生政策
Public Health Res Pract. 2017 Feb 15;27(1):2711701. doi: 10.17061/phrp2711701.
7
Clinicians' perceptions of decision making regarding discharge from public hospitals to in-patient rehabilitation following trauma.临床医生对创伤后从公立医院出院到住院康复的决策认知。
Aust Health Rev. 2017 May;41(2):192-200. doi: 10.1071/AH16031.
8
An exploratory study identifying where local government public health decision makers source their evidence for policy.一项探索性研究,旨在确定地方政府公共卫生决策者制定政策时的证据来源。
Health Promot J Austr. 2014 Aug;25(2):139-42. doi: 10.1071/HE14012.
9
Government databases and public health research: facilitating access in the public interest.政府数据库与公共卫生研究:为了公共利益促进信息获取。
J Law Med. 2014 Jun;21(4):957-72.
10
Building the links between surveillance, research, and policy and practice--dental public health experiences in Australia.建立监测、研究、政策与实践之间的联系——澳大利亚的口腔公共卫生经验。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2012 Oct;40 Suppl 2:82-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2012.00725.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing the utilization of doctoral research findings at a university in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: Views of academic leaders.南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省一所大学利用博士研究成果的影响因素:学术领袖的观点。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 31;18(8):e0290651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290651. eCollection 2023.
2
Paper 1: Demand-driven rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: lessons from Lebanon, Ethiopia, and South Africa on researchers and policymakers' experiences.论文 1:面向卫生政策和体系决策的需求驱动型快速审查:来自黎巴嫩、埃塞俄比亚和南非的研究人员和决策者的经验教训。
Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 30;11(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02021-3.
3
Framework synthesis to inform the ideation and design of a paper-based health information system (PHISICC).
用于为基于纸张的健康信息系统 (PHISICC) 的构思和设计提供信息的框架综合。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2022 Jul;37(4):1953-1972. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3487. Epub 2022 Apr 23.
4
Force field analysis of driving and restraining factors affecting the evidence-based decision-making in health systems; comparing two approaches.影响卫生系统循证决策的驱动因素和制约因素的力场分析;两种方法的比较
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Nov 30;10:419. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1142_20. eCollection 2021.
5
Determinants of using children's mental health research in policymaking: variation by type of research use and phase of policy process.影响将儿童心理健康研究用于决策的因素:按研究用途类型和政策过程阶段的变化。
Implement Sci. 2021 Jan 19;16(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01081-8.
6
The governmental health policy-development process for Syrian refugees: an embedded qualitative case studies in Lebanon and Ontario.叙利亚难民的政府卫生政策制定过程:黎巴嫩和安大略省的嵌入式定性案例研究
Confl Health. 2019 Oct 21;13:48. doi: 10.1186/s13031-019-0231-z. eCollection 2019.
7
How was research engaged with and used in the development of 131 policy documents? Findings and measurement implications from a mixed methods study.研究如何参与并应用于 131 项政策文件的制定?一项混合方法研究的发现和衡量意义。
Implement Sci. 2019 Apr 30;14(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0886-2.
8
System dynamics modeling of public health services provided by China CDC to control infectious and endemic diseases in China.中国疾病预防控制中心为控制中国传染病和地方病所提供公共卫生服务的系统动力学建模。
Infect Drug Resist. 2019 Mar 13;12:613-625. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S185177. eCollection 2019.
9
The Funding, Administrative, and Policy Influences on the Evaluation of Primary Prevention Programs in Australia.澳大利亚初级预防项目评价的资金、行政和政策影响。
Prev Sci. 2019 Aug;20(6):959-969. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-00997-4.
10
Making or buying evidence: Using transaction cost economics to understand decision-making in public school districts.制造或购买证据:运用交易成本经济学理解公立学区的决策制定
Evid Policy. 2018 Nov;14(4):707-724. doi: 10.1332/174426416X14778277473701.