Feazel Leah M, Malhotra Ashish, Perencevich Eli N, Kaboli Peter, Diekema Daniel J, Schweizer Marin L
Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA The Center for Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA, USA.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Jul;69(7):1748-54. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku046. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
Despite vigorous infection control measures, Clostridium difficile continues to cause significant disease burden. Antibiotic stewardship programmes (ASPs) may prevent C. difficile infections by limiting exposure to certain antibiotics. Our objective was to perform a meta-analysis of published studies to assess the effect of ASPs on the risk of C. difficile infection in hospitalized adult patients.
Searches of PubMed, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and two Cochrane databases were conducted to find all published studies on interventions related to antibiotic stewardship and C. difficile. Two investigators independently assessed study eligibility and extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed using the Downs and Black tool. Risk ratios were pooled using random effects models. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I(2) statistic.
The final search yielded 891 articles; 78 full articles were reviewed and 16 articles were identified for inclusion. Included articles used quasi-experimental (interrupted time series or before-after) or observational (case-control) study designs. When the results of all studies were pooled in a random effects model, a significant protective effect (pooled risk ratio 0.48; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.62) was observed between ASPs and C. difficile incidence. When stratified by intervention type, a significant effect was found for restrictive ASPs (complete removal of drug or prior approval requirement). Furthermore, ASPs were particularly effective in geriatric settings.
Restrictive ASPs can be used to reduce the risk of C. difficile infection.
尽管采取了严格的感染控制措施,但艰难梭菌仍继续造成重大疾病负担。抗生素管理计划(ASPs)可能通过限制对某些抗生素的接触来预防艰难梭菌感染。我们的目的是对已发表的研究进行荟萃分析,以评估ASPs对住院成年患者艰难梭菌感染风险的影响。
检索了PubMed、科学网、护理及相关健康文献累积索引和两个Cochrane数据库,以查找所有已发表的与抗生素管理和艰难梭菌相关干预措施的研究。两名研究人员独立评估研究的合格性并提取数据。使用唐斯和布莱克工具评估偏倚风险。使用随机效应模型汇总风险比。使用I²统计量评估异质性。
最终检索得到891篇文章;对78篇全文进行了审查,确定16篇文章纳入分析。纳入的文章采用了准实验(中断时间序列或前后对照)或观察性(病例对照)研究设计。当所有研究结果汇总到随机效应模型中时,观察到ASPs与艰难梭菌发病率之间存在显著的保护作用(汇总风险比0.48;95%CI:0.38,0.62)。按干预类型分层时,发现限制性ASPs(完全停用药物或需事先批准)有显著效果。此外,ASPs在老年患者中尤其有效。
限制性ASPs可用于降低艰难梭菌感染风险。