• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尼日利亚伊费奥巴费米·阿沃洛沃大学教学医院综合院区择期剖宫产中短期与长期抗生素预防的比较

Comparison of short versus long term antibiotic prophylaxis in elective caesarean section at the Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.

作者信息

Ijarotimi A O, Badejoko O O, Ijarotimi O, Loto O M, Orji E O, Fasubaa O B

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Perinatology, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife.

出版信息

Niger Postgrad Med J. 2013 Dec;20(4):325-30.

PMID:24633277
Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

This study was to determine any significant difference between the incidence of infectious morbidity with the use of a 24 hour antibiotics regimen compared to a 7-day course of antibiotics following elective caesarean section using a cheap and easily available combination of Ampicillin/Cloxacillin and Metronidazole.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred patients planned to have elective caesarean section for various indications and who satisfied the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study in two groups of 100 patients each between the period of January to June 2010. Patients were randomized to receive either Ampiclox as 4 intravenous doses of 1g stat and 500 mg each 6 hourly and Metronidazole as 3 intravenous doses of 500 mg each 8 hourly both for 24 hours or same combination intravenously for 48 hours and subsequent oral use for 5 days.

RESULTS

The mean maternal age, parity, gestational age and indication for caesarean section were similar in the two groups of participants. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of febrile morbidity (17%/18%, p=0.852), urinary tract infection (6%/4%, p=0.196), wound infection (4%/3%, p=0.056) and endometritis (3%/2%, p=0.367). The mean cost of antibiotics per patient (N730/$4.65) in the short term prophylaxis group was half that of the long term prophylaxis group (N1, 540/$9.81).

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in the incidence of infection related morbidity when short term prophylactic antibiotics was used at elective caesarean section compared to long term prophylactic antibiotics.

摘要

目的与目标

本研究旨在确定在择期剖宫产术后使用24小时抗生素方案与使用7天抗生素疗程相比,使用廉价且易于获得的氨苄西林/氯唑西林和甲硝唑组合时,感染性发病率是否存在显著差异。

患者与方法

2010年1月至6月期间,将200名因各种适应症计划进行择期剖宫产且符合纳入标准的患者分为两组,每组100名。患者被随机分配接受以下治疗:氨苄西林/氯唑西林,静脉注射4剂,首剂1g,随后每6小时500mg;甲硝唑,静脉注射3剂,每8小时500mg,均持续24小时;或者相同组合静脉注射48小时,随后口服5天。

结果

两组参与者的平均产妇年龄、产次、孕周和剖宫产指征相似。发热性发病率(17%/18%,p = 0.852)、尿路感染(6%/4%,p = 0.196)、伤口感染(4%/3%,p = 0.056)和子宫内膜炎(3%/2%,p = 0.367)的发生率无统计学差异。短期预防组每位患者的抗生素平均费用(730奈拉/4.65美元)是长期预防组(1540奈拉/9.81美元)的一半。

结论

择期剖宫产时使用短期预防性抗生素与长期预防性抗生素相比,感染相关发病率无差异。

相似文献

1
Comparison of short versus long term antibiotic prophylaxis in elective caesarean section at the Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.尼日利亚伊费奥巴费米·阿沃洛沃大学教学医院综合院区择期剖宫产中短期与长期抗生素预防的比较
Niger Postgrad Med J. 2013 Dec;20(4):325-30.
2
Ceftriaxone versus ampicillin/cloxacillin as antibiotic prophylaxis in elective caesarean section.剖宫产术中头孢曲松与氨苄西林/氯唑西林作为抗生素预防性用药的比较。
East Mediterr Health J. 2004 May;10(3):277-88.
3
Comparison of ceftriaxone versus triple drug regimen in the prevention of cesarean section infectious morbidities.头孢曲松与三联药物方案预防剖宫产感染性疾病的比较。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008 Sep;21(9):638-42. doi: 10.1080/14767050802220490.
4
Comparison of administration of single dose ceftriaxone for elective caesarean section before skin incision and after cord clamping in preventing post-operative infectious morbidity.比较单次头孢曲松给药在切开皮肤前和脐带夹闭后用于择期剖宫产术,以预防术后感染发病率。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Dec;288(6):1263-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2906-9. Epub 2013 May 29.
5
Antibiotic prophylaxis at elective cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial in a low resource setting.择期剖宫产术中抗生素预防:在资源匮乏环境下的一项随机对照试验。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Apr;27(6):588-91. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.823938. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
6
Comparison of single versus multiple doses of antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing post-elective Caesarean section infectious morbidity.单次与多次剂量抗生素预防在降低择期剖宫产术后感染发病率方面的比较。
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2010 Apr-Jun;8(30):179-84. doi: 10.3126/kumj.v8i2.3554.
7
Antibiotic prophylaxis before surgery vs after cord clamping in elective cesarean delivery: a double-blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.择期剖宫产手术前与脐带结扎后使用抗生素预防感染:一项双盲、前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照试验
Arch Surg. 2011 Dec;146(12):1404-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.725.
8
Single-dose compared with multiple day antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean section in low-resource settings, a randomized controlled, noninferiority trial.资源匮乏地区剖宫产单剂量与多日抗生素预防的随机对照非劣效性试验
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 Jan;94(1):43-9. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12517. Epub 2014 Oct 19.
9
Single-dose versus multiple-dose antibiotics prophylaxis for preventing caesarean section postpartum infections: A randomized controlled trial.单剂量与多剂量抗生素预防剖宫产术后感染的效果比较:一项随机对照试验。
Womens Health (Lond). 2022 Jan-Dec;18:17455057221101071. doi: 10.1177/17455057221101071.
10
Comparison of Short Course Versus Long Course Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Caesarean Section: A Randomised Controlled Trial.短疗程与长疗程抗生素预防剖宫产术的比较:一项随机对照试验。
West Afr J Med. 2021 Apr 23;38(4):398-404.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-dose versus multiple-dose antibiotics prophylaxis for preventing caesarean section postpartum infections: A randomized controlled trial.单剂量与多剂量抗生素预防剖宫产术后感染的效果比较:一项随机对照试验。
Womens Health (Lond). 2022 Jan-Dec;18:17455057221101071. doi: 10.1177/17455057221101071.
2
Supporting global antimicrobial stewardship: antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of surgical site infection in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): a scoping review and meta-analysis.支持全球抗菌药物管理:低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)预防手术部位感染的抗生素预防性用药:一项范围综述和荟萃分析
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2020 Oct 5;2(3):dlaa070. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaa070. eCollection 2020 Sep.
3
Different classes of antibiotics given to women routinely for preventing infection at caesarean section.
常规给予女性用于预防剖宫产感染的不同种类抗生素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 4;3(3):CD008726. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008726.pub3.
4
Short versus Long-Term Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Cesarean Section: A Randomized Clinical Trial.剖宫产短期与长期抗生素预防:一项随机临床试验
Niger Med J. 2020 Jul-Aug;61(4):173-179. doi: 10.4103/nmj.NMJ_197_20. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
5
The efficacy of two doses versus 7 days' course of prophylactic antibiotics following cesarean section: An experience from Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital.剖宫产术后两种剂量预防性抗生素与7天疗程预防性抗生素的疗效比较:阿明努·卡诺教学医院的经验
Ann Afr Med. 2020 Apr-Jun;19(2):103-112. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_39_19.
6
Different classes of antibiotics given to women routinely for preventing infection at caesarean section.常规给予女性用于预防剖宫产感染的不同种类抗生素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 17;2014(11):CD008726. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008726.pub2.