Suppr超能文献

鸽子的注意力权衡

Attentional tradeoffs in the pigeon.

作者信息

Vyazovska O V, Teng Y, Wasserman E A

机构信息

Institute for Problems of Cryobiology and Cryomedicine, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 May;101(3):337-54. doi: 10.1002/jeab.82. Epub 2014 Mar 14.

Abstract

We deployed the Multiple Necessary Cues (MNC) discrimination task to see if pigeons can simultaneously attend to four different dimensions of complex visual stimuli. Specifically, we trained nine pigeons (Columba livia) on a go/no go discrimination to peck only 1 of 16 compound stimuli created from all possible combinations of two stimulus values from four separable visual dimensions: shape (circle/square), size (large/small), line orientation (horizontal/vertical), and brightness (dark/light). Some of the pigeons had CLHD (circle, large, horizontal, dark) as the positive stimulus (S+), whereas others had SSVL (square, small, vertical, light) as the S+. We recorded touchscreen pecking during the first 15 s that each stimulus was presented on each training trial. Discrimination training continued until pigeons' rates of responding to all 15 negative stimuli (S-s) fell to less than 15% of their response rates to the S+. All pigeons acquired the MNC discrimination, suggesting that they attended to all four dimensions of the multidimensional stimuli. Learning rate was similar for all four dimensions, indicating equivalent salience of the discriminative stimuli. The more dimensions along which the S-s differed from the S+, the faster was discrimination learning, suggesting an added benefit from increasing perceptual disparities of the S-s from the S+. Finally, evidence of attentional tradeoffs among the four dimensions was seen during discrimination learning, raising interesting questions concerning the possible control of behavior by elemental and configural stimuli.

摘要

我们采用了多重必要线索(MNC)辨别任务,以探究鸽子是否能够同时关注复杂视觉刺激的四个不同维度。具体而言,我们训练了九只鸽子(家鸽)进行“是/否”辨别,使其仅啄击由四个可分离视觉维度(形状:圆形/方形;大小:大/小;线条方向:水平/垂直;亮度:暗/亮)的两种刺激值的所有可能组合所产生的16种复合刺激中的一种。一些鸽子将CLHD(圆形、大、水平、暗)作为正性刺激(S+),而其他鸽子则将SSVL(方形、小、垂直、亮)作为S+。在每次训练试验中,我们记录了每个刺激呈现的前15秒内鸽子在触摸屏上的啄击情况。辨别训练持续进行,直到鸽子对所有15种负性刺激(S-)的反应率降至其对S+反应率的15%以下。所有鸽子都学会了MNC辨别,这表明它们关注了多维刺激的所有四个维度。所有四个维度的学习率相似,表明辨别刺激的显著性相当。S-与S+在更多维度上不同时,辨别学习速度越快,这表明增加S-与S+之间的感知差异会带来额外的好处。最后,在辨别学习过程中观察到了四个维度之间注意力权衡的证据,这引发了关于基本刺激和构型刺激对行为可能控制的有趣问题。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验