• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测试鸽子(Columba livia)类比规则迁移。

Testing analogical rule transfer in pigeons (Columba livia).

机构信息

Tufts University, Department of Psychology, USA.

University of California, Santa Barbara, Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, USA.

出版信息

Cognition. 2019 Feb;183:256-268. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.11.011. Epub 2018 Nov 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.11.011
PMID:30508704
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6322971/
Abstract

Categorization is an essential cognitive process useful for transferring knowledge from previous experience to novel situations. The mechanisms by which trained categorization behavior extends to novel stimuli, especially in animals, are insufficiently understood. To understand how pigeons learn and transfer category membership, seven pigeons were trained to classify controlled, bi-dimensional stimuli in a two-alternative forced-choice task. Following either dimensional, rule-based (RB) or information integration (II) training, tests were conducted focusing on the "analogical" extension of the learned discrimination to novel regions of the stimulus space (Casale, Roeder, & Ashby, 2012). The pigeons' results mirrored those from human and non-human primates evaluated using the same analogical task structure, training and testing: the pigeons transferred their discriminative behavior to the new extended values following RB training, but not after II training. Further experiments evaluating rule-based models and association-based models suggested the pigeons use dimensions and associations to learn the task and mediate transfer to stimuli within the novel region of the parametric stimulus space.

摘要

分类是一种重要的认知过程,有助于将知识从先前的经验转移到新的情境中。对于受过训练的分类行为如何扩展到新的刺激,特别是在动物中,其机制还没有得到充分的理解。为了了解鸽子如何学习和转移类别成员身份,七只鸽子接受了在二选一强制选择任务中对控制的二维刺激进行分类的训练。在基于规则(RB)或信息整合(II)的训练之后,进行了侧重于将所学的辨别力“类推”到刺激空间的新区域的测试(Casale、Roeder 和 Ashby,2012)。鸽子的结果与使用相同类推任务结构、训练和测试的人类和非人类灵长类动物的结果相似:鸽子在 RB 训练后将其辨别行为转移到新的扩展值,而在 II 训练后则不能。进一步评估基于规则的模型和基于关联的模型的实验表明,鸽子使用维度和关联来学习任务,并在参数刺激空间的新区域内的刺激中进行中介转移。

相似文献

1
Testing analogical rule transfer in pigeons (Columba livia).测试鸽子(Columba livia)类比规则迁移。
Cognition. 2019 Feb;183:256-268. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.11.011. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
2
Transfer between local and global processing levels by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens) in exemplar- and rule-based categorization tasks.鸽子(家鸽)和人类(智人)在基于范例和规则的分类任务中在局部和全局处理水平之间的转换。
J Comp Psychol. 2015 Feb;129(1):1-16. doi: 10.1037/a0037691. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
3
Multiple feature use in pigeons' category discrimination: The influence of stimulus set structure and the salience of stimulus differences.鸽子类别辨别中多种特征的运用:刺激集结构和刺激差异显著性的影响
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2018 Apr;44(2):114-127. doi: 10.1037/xan0000169.
4
Pigeons exhibit flexibility but not rule formation in dimensional learning, stimulus generalization, and task switching.鸽子在维度学习、刺激泛化和任务转换中表现出灵活性,但不具备规则形成能力。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2020 Apr;46(2):107-123. doi: 10.1037/xan0000234. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
5
Local rather than global processing of visual arrays in numerosity discrimination by pigeons (Columba livia).鸽子(家鸽)在数量辨别中对视觉阵列进行局部而非全局处理。
Anim Cogn. 2009 May;12(3):511-26. doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0212-5. Epub 2009 Jan 30.
6
A comparative analysis of the categorization of multidimensional stimuli: I. Unidimensional classification does not necessarily imply analytic processing; evidence from pigeons (Columba livia), squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis), and humans (Homo sapiens).多维刺激分类的比较分析:I. 单维分类不一定意味着分析处理;来自鸽子(家鸽)、松鼠(卡罗来纳松鼠)和人类(智人)的证据。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Nov;123(4):391-405. doi: 10.1037/a0016216.
7
Domestic pigeons (Columba livia) discriminate between photographs of individual pigeons.家鸽(Columba livia)能够区分不同家鸽的照片。
Learn Behav. 2003 Nov;31(4):307-17. doi: 10.3758/bf03195993.
8
Imitative learning of stimulus-response and response-outcome associations in pigeons.鸽子对刺激-反应及反应-结果关联的模仿学习
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2005 Jul;31(3):289-300. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.31.3.289.
9
Scene gist categorization by pigeons.鸽子对场景要点的分类。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2014 Apr;40(2):162-77. doi: 10.1037/xan0000014.
10
Abstract-concept learning carryover effects from the initial training set in pigeons (Columba livia).摘要——鸽子(家鸽)初始训练集中抽象概念学习的迁移效应。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Feb;123(1):79-89. doi: 10.1037/a0013126.

引用本文的文献

1
The pigeon as a machine: Complex category structures can be acquired by a simple associative model.作为机器的鸽子:复杂的类别结构可通过简单的联想模型习得。
iScience. 2023 Sep 22;26(10):107998. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107998. eCollection 2023 Oct 20.
2
Multisensory transfer effects in implicit and explicit category learning.内隐和外显类别学习中的多感觉转移效应。
Psychol Res. 2023 Jul;87(5):1353-1369. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01754-z. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
3
How do we generalize?我们如何进行归纳?
Neuron Behav Data Anal Theory. 2021 Aug 30;1. doi: 10.51628/001c.27687.
4
The Lords of the Rings: People and pigeons take different paths mastering the concentric-rings categorization task.《指环王》:人鸽殊途同归,玩转同心环分类任务。
Cognition. 2022 Jan;218:104920. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104920. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
5
Pigeons proficiently switch among four tasks without cost.鸽子可以毫不费力地在四项任务之间切换。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2021 Apr;47(2):150-162. doi: 10.1037/xan0000287.
6
A Dissociative Framework for Understanding Same-Different Conceptualization.一个用于理解异同概念化的解离框架。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2021 Feb;37:13-18. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.06.004. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
7
Exploring Explicit Learning Strategies: A Dissociative Framework for Research.探索显性学习策略:一个用于研究的分离框架。
New Ideas Psychol. 2021 Jan;60. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2020.100817. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
8
Conceptual anchoring dissociates implicit and explicit category learning.概念锚定可分离内隐和外显类别学习。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Jun;48(6):813-828. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000856. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
9
Within-session dynamics of categorical and memory mechanisms in pigeons.鸽子在单次试验中的类别和记忆机制的动态变化。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Apr;28(2):548-555. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01842-4. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
10
Pigeons exhibit flexibility but not rule formation in dimensional learning, stimulus generalization, and task switching.鸽子在维度学习、刺激泛化和任务转换中表现出灵活性,但不具备规则形成能力。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2020 Apr;46(2):107-123. doi: 10.1037/xan0000234. Epub 2020 Jan 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Multiple feature use in pigeons' category discrimination: The influence of stimulus set structure and the salience of stimulus differences.鸽子类别辨别中多种特征的运用:刺激集结构和刺激差异显著性的影响
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2018 Apr;44(2):114-127. doi: 10.1037/xan0000169.
2
Mechanisms underlying speech sound discrimination and categorization in humans and zebra finches.人类和斑胸草雀语音辨别与分类的潜在机制。
Anim Cogn. 2018 Mar;21(2):285-299. doi: 10.1007/s10071-018-1165-3. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
3
The transfer of category knowledge by macaques (Macaca mulatta) and humans (Homo sapiens).猕猴(恒河猴)和人类(智人)对类别知识的迁移。
J Comp Psychol. 2018 Feb;132(1):58-74. doi: 10.1037/com0000095. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
4
Generalization of category knowledge and dimensional categorization in humans (Homo sapiens) and nonhuman primates (Macaca mulatta).人类(智人)和非人类灵长类动物(猕猴)的类别知识泛化与维度分类
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2015 Oct;41(4):322-35. doi: 10.1037/xan0000071. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
5
Selective attention and pigeons' multiple necessary cues discrimination learning.选择性注意与鸽子的多重必要线索辨别学习
Behav Processes. 2015 Mar;112:61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
6
Neurons in the pigeon nidopallium caudolaterale signal the selection and execution of perceptual decisions.鸽子尾外侧巢皮质中的神经元对感知决策的选择和执行进行信号传递。
Eur J Neurosci. 2014 Nov;40(9):3316-27. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12698. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
7
Attentional tradeoffs in the pigeon.鸽子的注意力权衡
J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 May;101(3):337-54. doi: 10.1002/jeab.82. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
8
Individual differences in learning and transfer: stable tendencies for learning exemplars versus abstracting rules.学习与迁移中的个体差异:学习范例与抽象规则的稳定倾向。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Apr;143(2):668-93. doi: 10.1037/a0032963. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
9
Implicit and explicit categorization: a tale of four species.内隐和外显分类:四种物种的故事。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Nov;36(10):2355-69. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
10
A configural theory of attention and associative learning.一种关于注意力和联想学习的构型理论。
Learn Behav. 2012 Sep;40(3):241-54. doi: 10.3758/s13420-012-0078-2.