Parthasarathy Sairam, Subramanian Shyam, Quan Stuart F
Arizona Respiratory Center ; Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep, Mercy West Hospital, Cincinnati, OH.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2014 Mar 15;10(3):243-9. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.3518.
To study the effect of sleep center accreditation and Sleep Medicine board certification of physicians on patient-centered outcomes in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
Prospective, multicenter, comparative effectiveness study.
Four sleep centers.
502 patients with OSA.
None.
Patients at two accredited and two non-accredited centers underwent polysomnography at participating locations and completed validated questionnaires, with objective measurement of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy adherence performed three months after therapy initiation. The proportion of patients (age 53 ± 13[SD] years; 26% women; and body mass index 33.6 ± 7.2 kg/m(2)) who were adherent to PAP therapy by Medicare guidelines (> 70% of nights with ≥ 4 h use over a 30-day period) was greater in accredited (79%) than non-accredited sites (64%; p = 0.004). After adjustment for confounding variables, patients who received care from accredited centers (odds ratio [OR] 2.2, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-4.2; p = 0.016) and certified physicians (OR 2.3, 95% CI, 1.3-4.0; p = 0.005) were more likely to be adherent to PAP therapy than those who received care from non-accredited centers and non-certified physicians. Patient satisfaction was associated with greater education received from physician (OR 4.6; 95% CI 2.3-9.3); greater risk perception (OR 2.7; 95% CI 1.0-7.4); physician certification (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.1-4.2); and inversely related to delays in care (OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.3-0.9; p < 0.05). Such delays were inversely related to accreditation-certification status (p < 0.0001).
In patients with OSA, accreditation-certification status of sleep centers and physicians was associated with better PAP adherence, better patient education, better patient satisfaction, and greater timeliness.
A commentary on this article appears in this issue on page 251.
Parthasarathy S; Subramanian S; Quan SF. A multicenter prospective comparative effectiveness study of the effect of physician certification and center accreditation on patient-centered outcomes in obstructive sleep apnea.
研究睡眠中心认证及医生的睡眠医学委员会认证对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)以患者为中心的治疗效果的影响。
前瞻性、多中心、比较效果研究。
四个睡眠中心。
502例OSA患者。
无。
两个获得认证和两个未获得认证的中心的患者在参与地点接受多导睡眠图检查,并完成经过验证的问卷,在开始治疗三个月后对持续气道正压通气(PAP)治疗依从性进行客观测量。符合医疗保险指南(30天内≥4小时使用的夜晚数>70%)的PAP治疗依从性患者(年龄53±13[标准差]岁;26%为女性;体重指数33.6±7.2kg/m²)在获得认证的中心(79%)高于未获得认证的中心(64%;p = 0.004)。在对混杂变量进行调整后,接受来自获得认证中心治疗的患者(优势比[OR]2.2,95%置信区间[CI],1.2 - 4.2;p = 0.016)和获得认证医生治疗的患者(OR 2.3,95%CI,1.3 - 4.0;p = 0.005)比接受来自未获得认证中心和未获得认证医生治疗的患者更有可能坚持PAP治疗。患者满意度与从医生处获得的更多教育(OR 4.6;95%CI 2.3 - 9.3)、更高的风险认知(OR 2.7;95%CI 1.0 - 7.4)、医生认证(OR 2.1;95%CI 1.1 - 4.2)相关,并且与护理延迟呈负相关(OR 0.5;95%CI 0.3 - 0.9;p < 0.05)。这种延迟与认证状态呈负相关(p < 0.0001)。
在OSA患者中,睡眠中心和医生的认证状态与更好的PAP依从性、更好的患者教育、更好的患者满意度以及更高的及时性相关。
关于本文的一篇评论发表在本期第251页。
Parthasarathy S; Subramanian S; Quan SF. 一项关于医生认证和中心认证对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停以患者为中心的治疗效果的多中心前瞻性比较效果研究。