Chen Taolin, Kendrick Keith Maurice, Feng Chunliang, Yang Suyong, Wang Xiaogang, Yang Xun, Lei Du, Wu Min, Huang Xiaoqi, Gong Qiyong, Luo Yuejia
Huaxi MR Research Center (HMRRC), Department of Radiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Psychophysiology. 2014 May;51(5):478-88. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12165. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
This study investigated the neural effect of conflict context modulation of cognitive and affective conflict processing by recording evoked-response potentials in cognitive and affective versions of a flanker task. By varying the proportion of congruent and incongruent trials in a block, we found different patterns of the context effect on evoked potentials during cognitive and affective conflict processing. For posterior N1 amplitude, frequent incongruent trials produced a larger effect only in the affective task. The opposite pattern of the context effect was observed for the central N450, which was enhanced by frequent cognitive but reduced by frequent affective contexts. We found similar context effect on the parietal sustained potential in both tasks. Overall, our findings suggest that cognitive and affective conflict processing engage a context-dependent attentional control mechanism but a common conflict response system.
本研究通过记录侧翼任务认知版和情感版中的诱发电位,探究了冲突情境对认知和情感冲突处理的神经影响。通过改变一个组块中一致和不一致试验的比例,我们发现在认知和情感冲突处理过程中,情境对诱发电位的影响模式不同。对于后部N1波幅,频繁的不一致试验仅在情感任务中产生更大的影响。对于中央N450,观察到相反的情境效应模式,频繁的认知情境增强了N450,而频繁的情感情境则使其减弱。我们在两个任务中都发现了对顶叶持续电位类似的情境效应。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,认知和情感冲突处理涉及一种依赖于情境的注意力控制机制,但有一个共同的冲突反应系统。