Yuan Shuge, Xu Mengsi, Zhang Lijie
CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Dec 1;45(17):e70088. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70088.
Previous studies have found that betrayal increases negative attentional bias and hinders executive control. However, it remains unclear how betrayal influences emotional modulation of executive control. What's more, according to the dual mechanisms of control model, executive control can be divided into reactive and proactive control. It also requires clarification whether both aspects of executive control are affected equally by betrayal in emotional contexts. Thus, the present study aims to provide insight into how betrayal influences the emotional modulation of executive control. Betrayal was induced using a repeated trust game in two experiments. Eighty-two participants (40 for Experiment 1 and 42 for Experiment 2) completed emotional executive control tasks while event-related potentials were recorded. In Experiment 1, an emotional Go/No-go task was used to explore the impact of betrayal on the emotional modulation of executive control. The results indicated that betrayal resulted in inefficient top-down attention processing towards negative stimuli and impaired executive control over these stimuli. This was evidenced by higher N2a and N2b amplitudes in the angry Go condition, and smaller angry No-go P3 amplitudes in individuals who experienced betrayal compared to the control group. In Experiment 2, a modified emotional Stroop task was employed to measure proactive and reactive control in emotional contexts. The results indicated that betrayal impaired only reactive control towards negative stimuli and did not affect proactive control. This was evidenced by the betrayed group exhibiting smaller SP amplitudes under the happy incongruent condition in the most congruent context, with no significant difference observed in the most incongruent context. In summary, betrayal decreases the efficiency of top-down attentional processing directed towards negative stimuli and hampers executive control over negative stimuli. Moreover, this impairment appears to be confined to reactive control strategy.
先前的研究发现,背叛会增加负面注意偏向并阻碍执行控制。然而,背叛如何影响执行控制的情绪调节仍不清楚。此外,根据控制模型的双重机制,执行控制可分为反应性控制和主动性控制。在情绪背景下,背叛是否对执行控制的这两个方面产生同等影响也需要澄清。因此,本研究旨在深入了解背叛如何影响执行控制的情绪调节。在两项实验中,通过重复信任博弈诱发背叛。82名参与者(实验1有40名,实验2有42名)完成情绪执行控制任务,同时记录事件相关电位。在实验1中,使用情绪Go/No-go任务来探究背叛对执行控制情绪调节的影响。结果表明,背叛导致对负面刺激的自上而下注意加工效率低下,并损害了对这些刺激的执行控制。与对照组相比,在愤怒的Go条件下,经历背叛的个体N2a和N2b波幅更高,愤怒的No-go条件下P3波幅更小,这证明了这一点。在实验2中,采用改良的情绪Stroop任务来测量情绪背景下的主动性和反应性控制。结果表明,背叛仅损害了对负面刺激的反应性控制,而不影响主动性控制。这在背叛组在最一致背景下的快乐不一致条件下表现出较小的SP波幅得到证明,在最不一致背景下未观察到显著差异。总之,背叛降低了针对负面刺激的自上而下注意加工的效率,并阻碍了对负面刺激的执行控制。此外,这种损害似乎仅限于反应性控制策略。