• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管癌三维适形放疗与调强放疗的比较结果

Comparative outcomes for three-dimensional conformal versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy for esophageal cancer.

作者信息

Freilich J, Hoffe S E, Almhanna K, Dinwoodie W, Yue B, Fulp W, Meredith K L, Shridhar R

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Dis Esophagus. 2015 May-Jun;28(4):352-7. doi: 10.1111/dote.12203. Epub 2014 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1111/dote.12203
PMID:24635657
Abstract

Emerging data suggests a benefit for using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for the management of esophageal cancer. We retrospectively reviewed patients treated at our institution who received definitive or preoperative chemoradiation with either IMRT or 3D conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) between October 2000 and January 2012. Kaplan Meier analysis and the Cox proportional hazard model were used to evaluate survival outcomes. We evaluated a total of 232 patients (138 IMRT, 94 3DCRT) who received a median dose of 50.4 Gy (range, 44-64.8) to gross disease. Median follow up for all patients, IMRT patients alone, and 3DCRT patients alone was 18.5 (range, 2.5-124.2), 16.5 (range, 3-59), and 25.9 months (range, 2.5-124.2), respectively. We observed no significant difference based on radiation technique (3DCRT vs. IMRT) with respect to median overall survival (OS) (median 29 vs. 32 months; P = 0.74) or median relapse free survival (median 20 vs. 25 months; P = 0.66). On multivariable analysis (MVA), surgical resection resulted in improved OS (HR 0.444; P < 0.0001). Superior OS was also associated on MVA with stage I/II disease (HR 0.523; P = 0.010) and tumor length ≤5 cm (HR 0.567; P = 0.006). IMRT was also associated on univariate analysis with a significant decrease in acute weight loss (mean 6% + 4.3% vs 9% + 7.4%, P = 0.012) and on MVA with a decrease in objective grade ≥3 toxicity, defined as any hospitalization, feeding tube, or >20% weight loss (OR 0.51; P = 0.050). Our data suggest that while IMRT-based chemoradiation for esophageal cancer does not impact survival there was significantly less toxicity. In the IMRT group there was significant decrease in weight loss and grade ≥3 toxicity compared to 3DCRT.

摘要

新出现的数据表明,使用调强放射治疗(IMRT)治疗食管癌有益。我们回顾性分析了2000年10月至2012年1月期间在我院接受确定性或术前放化疗的患者,这些患者接受了IMRT或三维适形放射治疗(3DCRT)。采用Kaplan-Meier分析和Cox比例风险模型评估生存结果。我们共评估了232例患者(138例接受IMRT,94例接受3DCRT),对大体肿瘤给予的中位剂量为50.4 Gy(范围44-64.8 Gy)。所有患者、仅接受IMRT的患者以及仅接受3DCRT的患者的中位随访时间分别为18.5个月(范围2.5-124.2个月)、16.5个月(范围3-59个月)和25.9个月(范围2.5-124.2个月)。在中位总生存期(OS)(中位29个月对32个月;P = 0.74)或中位无复发生存期(中位20个月对25个月;P = 0.66)方面,我们未观察到基于放疗技术(3DCRT与IMRT)的显著差异。在多变量分析(MVA)中,手术切除可改善总生存期(HR 0.444;P < 0.0001)。在MVA中,I/II期疾病(HR 0.523;P = 0.010)和肿瘤长度≤5 cm(HR 0.567;P = 0.006)也与较好的总生存期相关。在单变量分析中,IMRT还与急性体重减轻显著减少相关(平均6% + 4.3%对9% + 7.4%,P = 0.012),在MVA中与客观≥3级毒性降低相关,定义为任何住院、放置饲管或体重减轻>20%(OR 0.51;P = 0.050)。我们的数据表明,虽然基于IMRT的食管癌放化疗不影响生存,但毒性显著降低。与3DCRT相比,IMRT组体重减轻和≥3级毒性显著降低。

相似文献

1
Comparative outcomes for three-dimensional conformal versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy for esophageal cancer.食管癌三维适形放疗与调强放疗的比较结果
Dis Esophagus. 2015 May-Jun;28(4):352-7. doi: 10.1111/dote.12203. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
2
Intensity-modulated versus 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in the definitive treatment of esophageal cancer: comparison of outcomes and acute toxicity.调强放疗与三维适形放疗在食管癌根治性治疗中的比较:疗效与急性毒性对比
Radiat Oncol. 2017 Aug 15;12(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0863-3.
3
Comparison of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy, and volumetric-modulated arc therapy in the treatment of cervical esophageal carcinoma.三维适形放射治疗、调强放射治疗和容积调强弧形治疗在颈段食管癌治疗中的比较。
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Feb 1;30(2):1-8. doi: 10.1111/dote.12497.
4
Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy May Improve Local-Regional Tumor Control for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Compared With Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy.与三维适形放疗相比,调强放疗可能改善局部晚期非小细胞肺癌的局部区域肿瘤控制。
Oncologist. 2016 Dec;21(12):1530-1537. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0155. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
5
Clinical results of definitive chemoradiotherapy for cervical esophageal cancer: Comparison of failure pattern and toxicities between intensity-modulated radiotherapy and 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy.颈段食管癌根治性放化疗的临床结果:调强放疗与三维适形放疗失败模式及毒性的比较
Head Neck. 2017 Dec;39(12):2406-2415. doi: 10.1002/hed.24909. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
6
Outcomes and prognostic factors for patients with cervical esophageal cancer undergoing definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.根治性放疗或放化疗治疗颈段食管癌患者的结果和预后因素。
Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2019 May 20;19(2):186-194. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2019.3873.
7
Toxicity and outcome of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer: a matched-pair analysis.调强放疗与三维适形放疗治疗口咽癌的毒性反应和结局:配对分析。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Apr;12(2):123-30. doi: 10.7785/tcrt.2012.500305. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
8
Evolution of radiation techniques in the treatment of mediastinal lymphoma: from 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) to intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) using helical tomotherapy (HT): a single-centre experience and review of the literature.纵隔淋巴瘤治疗中放射技术的演变:从三维适形放疗(3DCRT)到使用螺旋断层放疗(HT)的调强放疗(IMRT):单中心经验及文献综述
Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1059):20150409. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150409. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
9
Evaluating Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results From the National Cancer Data Base.评估局部晚期非小细胞肺癌的调强放射治疗:来自国家癌症数据库的结果
Clin Lung Cancer. 2016 Sep;17(5):398-405. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
10
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for stage I-II natural killer/T-cell lymphoma nasal type: dosimetric and clinical results.调强放疗与三维适形放疗治疗Ⅰ~Ⅱ期 NK/T 细胞淋巴瘤鼻型:剂量学和临床结果。
Radiat Oncol. 2013 Jun 25;8:152. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-152.

引用本文的文献

1
Radiation dose escalation in locally advanced oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis.局部晚期食管癌的放射剂量递增:一项系统评价和分层贝叶斯荟萃分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Aug 13;87:103432. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103432. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Improper lung volume-dose parameters are risk factors for acute fatal radiation pneumonitis among esophageal cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy: a case-control study.不适当的肺容积-剂量参数是接受放化疗的食管癌患者发生急性致命性放射性肺炎的危险因素:一项病例对照研究。
Front Oncol. 2025 Jan 28;15:1535676. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1535676. eCollection 2025.
3
Outcomes from a single institution cohort of 248 patients with stage I-III esophageal cancer treated with radiotherapy: Comparison of younger and older populations.
来自单一机构的248例I - III期食管癌患者接受放射治疗的结果:年轻人群与老年人群的比较。
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2024 Jun 29;31:100260. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100260. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Treatment Strategies for Locoregional Recurrence in Esophageal Squamous-Cell Carcinoma: An Updated Review.食管鳞状细胞癌局部区域复发的治疗策略:最新综述
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jul 14;16(14):2539. doi: 10.3390/cancers16142539.
5
A Meta-Analysis and Review of Radiation Dose Escalation in Definitive Radiation Therapy between Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma of Esophageal Cancer.一项关于食管癌鳞状细胞癌与腺癌根治性放射治疗中放射剂量递增的Meta分析与综述
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Feb 3;16(3):658. doi: 10.3390/cancers16030658.
6
The effect of histologic grade on neoadjuvant treatment outcomes in esophageal cancer.组织学分级对食管癌新辅助治疗效果的影响。
J Surg Oncol. 2022 Sep;126(3):465-478. doi: 10.1002/jso.26921. Epub 2022 May 16.
7
Prognostic impact of tumor length in esophageal Cancer: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.食管癌肿瘤长度的预后影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Sep 3;21(1):988. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08728-1.
8
Comprehensive Comparison of Progressive Optimization Algorithm Based Automatic Plan and Manually Planned Treatment Technique for Cervical-Thoracic Esophageal Cancers.基于渐进式优化算法的自动计划与颈胸段食管癌手动计划治疗技术的全面比较
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan-Dec;19:1533033820973283. doi: 10.1177/1533033820973283.
9
Comparison between Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy for Their Effectiveness in Esophageal Cancer Treatment: A Retrospective Single Institution Study.调强放疗与三维适形放疗在食管癌治疗中的疗效比较:一项单机构回顾性研究
J Oncol. 2020 Mar 20;2020:6582341. doi: 10.1155/2020/6582341. eCollection 2020.
10
Expression of miR-1304 in patients with esophageal carcinoma and risk factors for recurrence.miR-1304 在食管癌患者中的表达及其复发的危险因素。
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Feb 14;26(6):670-685. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i6.670.