Suppr超能文献

调强放疗与三维适形放疗治疗口咽癌的毒性反应和结局:配对分析。

Toxicity and outcome of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer: a matched-pair analysis.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology-Erasmus MC-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Apr;12(2):123-30. doi: 10.7785/tcrt.2012.500305. Epub 2012 Oct 19.

Abstract

Because of the scarcity of randomized trials comparing toxicity and outcomes of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) with 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), we performed a matched-pair analysis from prospectively collected data from the Head and Neck Tumor Registry of our institution. In the absence of phase III trials, we believe this approach provides the highest quality data possible. Ninety-two patients treated with 3DCRT were matched (1:1) to 92 patients treated with IMRT for 9 potential predictive factors for toxicity and outcome: gender, age, T-stage, N-stage, tumor subsite, unilateral neck irradiation, chemotherapy, neck dissection and boost technique. Groups were compared for acute and late toxicity, locoregional control (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Oncologic outcomes were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analyses and toxicity was analyzed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0. The overall incidence of grade 3 acute toxicity was significantly reduced by IMRT, compared to 3DCRT (45% vs. 70%, p = 0.001). The need for tube feeding was reduced from 50% to 37% (p = 0.04). The 3-year actuarial incidence of grade ≥2 late toxicity was also significantly reduced by IMRT, compared to 3DCRT (20% vs. 45%, respectively; p ≤ 0.0001). The incidence of grade ≥ 2 late dysphagia and xerostomia for IMRT vs. 3DCRT were 10% vs. 31% for dysphagia, p = 0.004 and 13% vs. 37%, for xerostomia, respectively (p = 0.001). The 3-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of LRC, DFS, and OS for IMRT vs. 3DCRT were 90% vs. 82% (p = 0.1), 82% vs. 76% (p = 0.3), and 72% vs. 64% (p = 0.2), respectively. In conclusion, the presented non-randomized comparative study of well-matched groups demonstrates the superiority of IMRT vs. 3DCRT for OPC by significantly reducing radiation-induced toxicity without jeopardizing outcomes. The improved therapeutic ratio achieved by the use of IMRT would allow dose escalation of radiotherapy to further improve outcomes of patients with OPC.

摘要

由于缺乏比较调强放疗(IMRT)与三维适形放疗(3DCRT)治疗口咽癌(OPC)的毒性和结局的随机临床试验,我们对来自我们机构头颈部肿瘤登记处的前瞻性收集数据进行了配对分析。在没有 III 期试验的情况下,我们认为这种方法提供了尽可能高质量的数据。92 例接受 3DCRT 治疗的患者与 92 例接受 IMRT 治疗的患者进行了匹配(1:1),匹配的因素包括 9 个潜在的毒性和结局预测因素:性别、年龄、T 分期、N 分期、肿瘤部位、单侧颈部照射、化疗、颈部清扫术和放疗补量技术。比较了两组的急性和晚期毒性、局部区域控制(LRC)、无病生存(DFS)和总生存(OS)。使用 Kaplan-Meier 分析估计肿瘤学结局,根据通用不良事件术语标准 3.0 分析毒性。与 3DCRT 相比,IMRT 显著降低了 3 级急性毒性的总体发生率(45% vs. 70%,p = 0.001)。需要管饲的比例从 50%降至 37%(p = 0.04)。3 年累积发病率≥2 级晚期毒性也显著降低,IMRT 组为 20%,3DCRT 组为 45%(p ≤ 0.0001)。与 3DCRT 相比,IMRT 组 3 级晚期吞咽困难和口干的发生率分别为 10%和 31%(p = 0.004),3 级晚期口干的发生率分别为 13%和 37%(p = 0.001)。IMRT 组和 3DCRT 组的 3 年 LRC、DFS 和 OS 的 Kaplan-Meier 估计值分别为 90%和 82%(p = 0.1)、82%和 76%(p = 0.3)和 72%和 64%(p = 0.2)。总之,这项非随机配对研究表明,与 3DCRT 相比,IMRT 显著降低了放射性毒性,同时不影响结局,从而为 OPC 提供了优势。通过使用 IMRT 实现的治疗效果的改善,将允许放疗剂量升级,从而进一步改善 OPC 患者的结局。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验