Suppr超能文献

慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)表型的AIMAR调查。

AIMAR survey on COPD phenotypes.

作者信息

Magnoni Maria Sandra, Rizzi Andrea, Visconti Alberto, Donner Claudio F

机构信息

AIMAR (Interdisciplinary Association for Research in Lung Disease), Arona, NO, Italy.

出版信息

Multidiscip Respir Med. 2014 Mar 17;9(1):16. doi: 10.1186/2049-6958-9-16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

COPD is characterized by considerable diversity in terms of clinical signs and symptoms, physiopathological mechanisms, response to treatment and disease progression. For this reason, the identification of different patient subgroups (or possible phenotypes) is important both for prognosis and for therapeutic objectives. Based on the foregoing, AIMAR has decided to conduct a survey on the perception of the prevalence of the different clinical COPD phenotypes/subtypes in the clinical practice of physicians who treat patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and on their therapeutic objectives.

METHODS

The survey consisted of 19 multiple-choice questions, compiled through a form published online. All the data and answers entered into the system were checked for consistency and completeness directly online at the time they were entered, and each respondent could only complete the questionnaire once.

RESULTS

The survey took place from May through October 2012. A total of 1,434 questionnaires (60% of the sample approached) were eligible for analysis, broken down as follows: 537 pulmonologists, 666 general practitioners (GPs), 72 internal medicine specialists, 36 allergists, 30 geriatricians, 93 other specialists. The results show that a significant proportion of GPs (33%) identified more than 50 patients in their practices with a diagnosis of COPD. Although most patients are or have been in treatment with a long-acting bronchodilator, the most common reasons for seeing a GP or a specialist were exacerbations and worsening of the symptoms, suggesting the importance of an appropriate background therapy in order to reduce the risk of disease instability. The frequent exacerbator phenotype was the most commonly found phenotype in clinical practice (by 75% of specialists and 66% of GPs); patients with a prevalent phenotype of chronic bronchitis were reported more often by GPs, while specialists reported a higher number of patients with a prevalent phenotype of emphysema.A medical history of exacerbations and the extent of deterioration of the spirometry parameters were considered to be the major indicators for COPD severity and clinical risk. In managing the frequent exacerbator phenotype, the therapeutic objectives - both for GPs and for specialists - included reducing airway inflammation, improving bronchial dilation, and reducing pulmonary hyperinflation. For this type of patients at high clinical risk, specialists selected a first-line therapeutic option based on a predetermined combination of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and a long-acting β2-agonist bronchodilator (LABA) and a second-line three-drug therapy (combination of ICS and two long-acting bronchodilators), while GPs' choices are more diversified, without a clear-cut prevalence of one type of treatment. In patients with COPD and concomitant cardiovascular diseases, frequently observed in clinical practice by all physicians, the combination of ICS and LABA was considered the first-choice option by the highest proportion of GPs (43%) and specialists (37%), while a smaller number of specialists (35%) opted for the long acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA). Both GPs and specialists believe that therapeutic continuity is of primary importance for the achievement of clinical outcomes with all classes of drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

A good knowledge of COPD has been observed in a high percentage of GPs, indicating an increased awareness of this disease in Primary Health Care. The frequent exacerbator phenotype is viewed by all physicians as the most prevalent in clinical practice, bearing a high risk of hospitalization. For specialists, therapeutic measures aimed at reducing the number and severity of exacerbations are primarily based on the combination of inhaled corticosteroid and bronchodilator, presumably because of the complementary pharmacological action of its components, whereas while GPs' choices tend to be more diversified. Adherence to medication regimens is of the essence for the achievement of clinical outcomes.

摘要

背景

慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)在临床体征和症状、生理病理机制、对治疗的反应以及疾病进展方面具有显著的多样性。因此,识别不同的患者亚组(或可能的表型)对于预后和治疗目标都很重要。基于上述情况,AIMAR决定对治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的医生在临床实践中对不同临床COPD表型/亚型患病率的认知以及他们的治疗目标进行一项调查。

方法

该调查由19个多项选择题组成,通过在线发布的表格汇编而成。所有输入系统的数据和答案在输入时直接在网上检查其一致性和完整性,每位受访者只能完成一次问卷。

结果

调查于2012年5月至10月进行。共有1434份问卷(占所接触样本的60%)符合分析条件,分类如下:537名肺科医生、666名全科医生(GP)、72名内科专家、36名过敏症专科医生、30名老年病科医生、93名其他专家。结果显示,相当比例的全科医生(33%)在其诊所中确诊了50多名COPD患者。尽管大多数患者正在或曾经接受长效支气管扩张剂治疗,但看全科医生或专科医生的最常见原因是症状加重和恶化,这表明适当的背景治疗对于降低疾病不稳定风险的重要性。频繁急性加重型是临床实践中最常见的表型(75%的专科医生和66%的全科医生报告);全科医生报告慢性支气管炎为主型的患者更多,而专科医生报告肺气肿为主型患者的数量更多。急性加重病史和肺功能测定参数的恶化程度被认为是COPD严重程度和临床风险的主要指标。在管理频繁急性加重型表型时,全科医生和专科医生的治疗目标都包括减轻气道炎症、改善支气管扩张和减少肺过度充气。对于这类临床风险高的患者,专科医生根据吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)和长效β2受体激动剂支气管扩张剂(LABA)的预定组合选择一线治疗方案以及二线三联药物治疗(ICS与两种长效支气管扩张剂的组合),而全科医生的选择则更多样化,没有一种治疗类型明显占优势。在所有医生临床实践中经常观察到的合并心血管疾病的COPD患者中,最高比例的全科医生(43%)和专科医生(37%)认为ICS和LABA的组合是首选方案,而较少比例的专科医生(35%)选择长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)。全科医生和专科医生都认为治疗的连续性对于使用各类药物实现临床疗效至关重要。

结论

观察到高比例的全科医生对COPD有较好的了解,这表明初级卫生保健中对这种疾病的认识有所提高。所有医生都认为频繁急性加重型是临床实践中最常见的,具有较高的住院风险。对于专科医生来说,旨在减少急性加重次数和严重程度的治疗措施主要基于吸入性糖皮质激素和支气管扩张剂的组合,可能是因为其成分具有互补的药理作用,而全科医生的选择往往更多样化。坚持药物治疗方案对于实现临床疗效至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/486c/3994894/e6be515765c4/2049-6958-9-16-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验