Blumenthal Kimberly G, Youngster Ilan, Shenoy Erica S, Banerji Aleena, Nelson Sandra B
Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Harvard Medical School, Boston Massachusetts, USA
Harvard Medical School, Boston Massachusetts, USA Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Jun;58(6):3137-43. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02504-13. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
The objective of the present study was to assess the safety and tolerability of cefazolin therapy among patients with methicillin-sensitive Gram-positive bacterial infections who develop non-IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to nafcillin. In this retrospective cohort analysis of the Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy program at the Massachusetts General Hospital from 2007 through 2013, we identified patients switched from nafcillin to cefazolin after an immune-mediated HSR. We reviewed patient demographics, details about the original HSR, and outcomes after the switch to cefazolin therapy. HSRs were classified by reaction type and likely mechanism. There were 467 patients treated with nafcillin, of which 60 (12.8%) were switched to cefazolin during their prescribed course. Of the 60 patients who transitioned to cefazolin, 17 (28.3%) were switched because of non-IgE-mediated HSRs. HSRs included maculopapular rash (n = 10), immune-mediated nephritis (n = 3), isolated eosinophilia (n = 2), immune-mediated hepatitis (n = 1), and a serum sickness-like reaction (n = 1). All but one patient (94.1%) who switched to cefazolin tolerated the drug with resolution of the HSR and completed their therapy with cefazolin. No patient experienced worsening of their rash or progressive organ dysfunction. With appropriate monitoring, therapy with cefazolin after non-IgE-mediated HSRs to nafcillin appears to be safe.
本研究的目的是评估在对萘夫西林发生非IgE介导的超敏反应(HSR)的甲氧西林敏感革兰氏阳性菌感染患者中,头孢唑林治疗的安全性和耐受性。在这项对2007年至2013年马萨诸塞州总医院门诊肠外抗菌治疗项目的回顾性队列分析中,我们确定了在免疫介导的HSR后从萘夫西林改用头孢唑林的患者。我们回顾了患者的人口统计学资料、原始HSR的详细情况以及改用头孢唑林治疗后的结果。HSR按反应类型和可能的机制进行分类。有467例患者接受了萘夫西林治疗,其中60例(12.8%)在规定疗程中改用了头孢唑林。在改用头孢唑林的60例患者中,17例(28.3%)因非IgE介导的HSR而改用。HSR包括斑丘疹(n = 10)、免疫介导的肾炎(n = 3)、单纯性嗜酸性粒细胞增多(n = 2)、免疫介导的肝炎(n = 1)和血清病样反应(n = 1)。除1例患者外,所有改用头孢唑林的患者(94.1%)对该药物耐受,HSR消退,并完成了头孢唑林治疗。没有患者出现皮疹恶化或进行性器官功能障碍。通过适当的监测,在对萘夫西林发生非IgE介导的HSR后使用头孢唑林治疗似乎是安全的。